• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Real life Enemy of the State?

marke said:
Some guy says it is OK for Hillary to break federal laws, destroy government property, obstruct investigations, and give Congress the finger, and you are OK with that? You must be a devoted godless democrat.
Click to expand...
Inspector General Horowitz deemed it not important enough to prosecute. Republican Comey deemed it not important enough to prosecute. No marke, that's not a Democrat thing, that's a Republican/non-partsian thing. Stop the silly games.
 
Mach said:
Inspector General Horowitz deemed it not important enough to prosecute. Republican Comey deemed it not important enough to prosecute. No marke, that's not a Democrat thing, that's a Republican/non-partsian thing. Stop the silly games.
Click to expand...


To hell with republicans who think it is OK for democrats they like to break federal laws and tell Congress to kiss their butts if they don't like it. Men like Gowdy, Jordan, Meadows, Nunan and others will not go along with that corrupt nonsense.
 
Can we expect "Law and Order SVU" to base an episode on this?
 
The dreamy idea that, in the United States, no one is above the law is bitterly comical. If you are rich enough, and powerful enough, you are above the law. The information that an Epstein trial could've revealed must be absolutely soul crushing, and there are probably many, many of these above-the-law individuals involved. I am not delusional enough to believe the truth will ever come out now. Color me a jaded cynic.
 
marke said:
To hell with republicans who think it is OK for democrats they like to break federal laws and tell Congress to kiss their butts if they don't like it. Men like Gowdy, Jordan, Meadows, Nunan and others will not go along with that corrupt nonsense.
Click to expand...
Nunes, Meadows, Gowdy, and Jordan, are giant **** headed morons, pure CT nutters, and everyone knows it. Glad your argument boiled down to those 4 dumb ****s supporting your position, and no one else except people who worship them. Couldn't ask for a better debate resolution.
 
Mach said:
Nunes, Meadows, Gowdy, and Jordan, are giant **** headed morons, pure CT nutters, and everyone knows it. Glad your argument boiled down to those 4 dumb ****s supporting your position, and no one else except people who worship them. Couldn't ask for a better debate resolution.
Click to expand...

Don't bother explaining how the democrats managed to get 4 FISA warrants to spy on Trump based upon a lying piece of crap fake spy document written by Glenn Simpson.
 
marke said:
Don't bother explaining how the democrats managed to get 4 FISA warrants to spy on Trump based upon a lying piece of crap fake spy document written by Glenn Simpson.
Click to expand...
No one with a brain would spend time explaining proper and normal process, as approved by (republican!) a panel of judges, etc. Trump's a security risk, he was investigated because of it...he's still a security risk. His kids, who couldn't pass security checks, are a risk. Is people, many (most?) having been fired, resigned, or forced out due to scandal, are a risk. Don't bother with CT theory nonsense, only the Nunes/Jordan idiots push that nonsense.
 
Mach said:
No one with a brain would spend time explaining proper and normal process, as approved by (republican!) a panel of judges, etc. Trump's a security risk, he was investigated because of it...he's still a security risk. His kids, who couldn't pass security checks, are a risk. Is people, many (most?) having been fired, resigned, or forced out due to scandal, are a risk. Don't bother with CT theory nonsense, only the Nunes/Jordan idiots push that nonsense.
Click to expand...

Democrats mock republicans for being conspiracy theorists while they continue their unending search for evidence of Russian collusion conspiracy that every reputable law enforcement body in the country said is not there.
 
marke said:
Democrats mock republicans for being conspiracy theorists while they continue their unending search for evidence of Russian collusion conspiracy that every reputable law enforcement body in the country said is not there.
Click to expand...
Where's Trump's personal attorney, Campaign chairman, deputy campaign chairman, national security advisor, coffee boy, and energy consultant? In federal prison or indicted on federal charges?

What's that?
 
Mach said:
Where's Trump's personal attorney, Campaign chairman, deputy campaign chairman, national security advisor, coffee boy, and energy consultant? In federal prison or indicted on federal charges?

What's that?
Click to expand...

If you believe that is Russian collusion with the Trump campaign then you must also believe Hillary is a saint who was cheated out of an election by liars and cheats and Russians.
 
marke said:
How does the fact that Jerry's office was ransacked after his assassination support the claim that investigators later found no files on Clinton because he never had them in the first place?
Click to expand...

His office wasn't ransacked.
 
marke said:
Do you think crooked agents ion the US government have ever murdered anyone while serving as agents, like those agents working for John Voight in the movie "Enemy of the State?"

We know Congress uncovered the fact that dirty agents for the FBI committed murder in Boston several decades ago and framed 4 men for murder that the FBI, including J. Edgar Hoover, knew they did not commit.

Why were the 4 men sent to death row for a crime they did not commit? Because they were "enemies of the corrupt state officials" who had corrupted government agencies for their own nefarious wicked purposes. Were there other "enemies of the state" who had to be killed to protect corrupt government leaders and officials? Maybe.

John Podesta posted an email in March 2016 saying if he found the leaker in the emails Assange had from the DNC that he intended to make an example of him. Remember when Rahm Emanuel went on a rant in a steakhouse with fellow democrat leaders, repeatedly stabbing his steak knife in the table after he named enemies of the democrat party one by one? Is Rahm Emanuel also filled with similar hatred for his political enemies or those among his friends who betray dirty secrets of the DNC? Apparently so.

Seth Rich was murdered just days after Assange notified the world he had an even larger cache of DNC emails with a great deal of damaging information on them. Assange suggested it was someone like Seth Rich who gave him the emails. Seth Rich was shot repeatedly one night by unknown assassins and taken to the hospital where he was put under close supervision by "government agents" who restricted access to him from even doctors and nurses. Rich died the next day.

Rich's computer and phone were stolen from his house after his assassination and the case has never been solved.
Click to expand...

False. There were no "government agents." Seth Rich wasn't under investigation by anyone. The working theory is he was killed by the same person or group of persons who were involved in a spate of violent robberies in the area at the time. And there was no motive. Seth Rich had nothing to do with Wikileaks. Your information is out of date. You ought to check your sources before you spread these conspiracy theories that can be easily debunked with a simple google search.

Was DNC Worker Seth Conrad Rich Gunned Down on His Way to Meet the FBI?

The baseless claim that slain DNC staffer Seth Rich gave emails to WikiLeaks | PunditFact

Gingrich Spreads Conspiracy Theory - FactCheck.org

Murder of Seth Rich - RationalWiki
 
lwf said:
False. There were no "government agents." Seth Rich wasn't under investigation by anyone. The working theory is he was killed by the same person or group of persons who were involved in a spate of violent robberies in the area at the time. And there was no motive. Seth Rich had nothing to do with Wikileaks. Your information is out of date. You ought to check your sources before you spread these conspiracy theories that can be easily debunked with a simple google search.

Was DNC Worker Seth Conrad Rich Gunned Down on His Way to Meet the FBI?

The baseless claim that slain DNC staffer Seth Rich gave emails to WikiLeaks | PunditFact

Gingrich Spreads Conspiracy Theory - FactCheck.org

Murder of Seth Rich - RationalWiki
Click to expand...

You have been totally taken in by the narrative being forwarded by democrats handling the investigation who claim they have no clue who killed Rich or why.
 
marke said:
You have been totally taken in by the narrative being forwarded by democrats handling the investigation who claim they have no clue who killed Rich or why.
Click to expand...

If you think you're one of the few who are plugged in to the real story, and that everyone else has had the wool pulled over their eyes, it's far more likely that in fact you are the one who has been hoodwinked by a small group with an agenda.
 
lwf said:
If you think you're one of the few who are plugged in to the real story, and that everyone else has had the wool pulled over their eyes, it's far more likely that in fact you are the one who has been hoodwinked by a small group with an agenda.
Click to expand...

Like it or not, somebody killed Rich for a reason and democrats in charge of the investigation have not been able to solve the case, like so many other unsolved suspicious murders associated with the Clintons and other high level politicians.
 
marke said:
Was Jeff Epstein too dangerous for too many powerful people to allow to live to testify about all the connections he arranged between rich and famous men and underage girls in his brothel?
Click to expand...

In my opinion, it was decided he could so embarrass the USA and many of our allies that he had to be eliminated calling it a matter of national security. He certainly could tag a former US president, the British Royal Family and the Saudi Royal family for starters,

While no evidence our current president ever visited pedophile island - unlike President Clinton did dozens of times, there is a photograph of President Trump and him standing near each other. There was no chance he would be allowed to live. The only thing remaining is assure any video tape and other evidence is found and destroyed.
 
joko104 said:
In my opinion, it was decided he could so embarrass the USA and many of our allies that he had to be eliminated calling it a matter of national security. He certainly could tag a former US president, the British Royal Family and the Saudi Royal family for starters,

While no evidence our current president ever visited pedophile island - unlike President Clinton did dozens of times, there is a photograph of President Trump and him standing near each other. There was no chance he would be allowed to live. The only thing remaining is assure any video tape and other evidence is found and destroyed.
Click to expand...

Post the evidence please.
 
lwf said:
If you think you're one of the few who are plugged in to the real story, and that everyone else has had the wool pulled over their eyes, it's far more likely that in fact you are the one who has been hoodwinked by a small group with an agenda.
Click to expand...

Julian Assange did not use his name, as I recall, but he alluded to someone 'on the inside'. Most all the material Wikileaks receives is from someone on the inside of some organization or another.

Assange was very clear that Russia was NOT the source. No state actor, a private whistleblower, like Bradley Manning.
 
Thoreau72 said:
Julian Assange did not use his name, as I recall, but he alluded to someone 'on the inside'. Most all the material Wikileaks receives is from someone on the inside of some organization or another.

Assange was very clear that Russia was NOT the source. No state actor, a private whistleblower, like Bradley Manning.
Click to expand...

Assuming Assange was telling the truth. If he had reason to protect his sources, then I doubt he was. If he ends up being extradited, I'm sure we'll find out how he got the material.
 
lwf said:
Assuming Assange was telling the truth. If he had reason to protect his sources, then I doubt he was. If he ends up being extradited, I'm sure we'll find out how he got the material.
Click to expand...

We already know how he got the material.

Assange is in prison BECAUSE he tells the truth. An unpleasant truth, but truth nonetheless.

He has no reason to lie.

Sex, Lies and Julian Assange - Four Corners
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom