• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What Happened to all the people HRC Killed?

NeverTrump

NeverTrump

Exposing GOP since 2015
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
25,357
Reaction score
11,557
Location
Post-Trump America
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
hmmm?? :shock:

Conspiracy theorists and QAnon believers linked Hillary Clinton to two shot state senators, 4 NYPD suicides, and the death of her brother. A month later, no links whatsoever have emerged and her arrest has not happened...
 
Last edited:
There's a whole wiki page. Some of the alleged people died, some were even killed in homicides; some had accidents (a Navy pilot in a helicopter crash, what a surprise); some suicides, some heart attacks, one IIRC of cancer (damn she's evil!) and a couple are alive and kicking to this day.

The whole Clinton Body Trail was a useful hoax as long as she was in politics and needed to be constantly vilified. It has served its purpose and is no longer necessary: like the emails and Benghazi.
 
uptower said:
There's a whole wiki page. Some of the alleged people died, some were even killed in homicides; some had accidents (a Navy pilot in a helicopter crash, what a surprise); some suicides, some heart attacks, one IIRC of cancer (damn she's evil!) and a couple are alive and kicking to this day.

The whole Clinton Body Trail was a useful hoax as long as she was in politics and needed to be constantly vilified. It has served its purpose and is no longer necessary: like the emails and Benghazi.
Click to expand...

And don't forget that Hillary Clinton ran a pizza-restaurant child-sex ring.
 
Rogue Valley said:
And don't forget that Hillary Clinton ran a pizza-restaurant child-sex ring.
Click to expand...

I have no doubt the FBI has a picture of Epstein and Trump eating pizza surrounded by a bunch of scantily cladded children
 
NeverTrump said:
hmmm?? :shock:

Conspiracy theorists and QAnon believers linked Hillary Clinton to two shot state senators, 4 NYPD suicides, and the death of her brother. A month later, no links whatsoever have emerged and her arrest has not happened...
Click to expand...

Hillary knows how to cover her tracks, probably better than Donald does.
 
Thoreau72 said:
Hillary knows how to cover her tracks, probably better than Donald does.
Click to expand...

The Donald is f***ing abysmal at covering his tracks. The only thing protecting him at this point is the complicity of Senate Republicans. His crimes aren't even 'hiding' in plain sight, they're just there in our faces.

We've seen how the Seth Rich story was a plant; the wiki page points to Snopes and the Chicago Tribune's detailed debunking of the assassination conspiracies. It's a shame they even had to bother.

Whatever Clinton has 'covered her tracks' on, it isn't bumping off fifty associates.
 
Thoreau72 said:
Hillary knows how to cover her tracks, probably better than Donald does.
Click to expand...

This theory has been shown to have been a Russian disinformation campaign.
 
Thoreau72 said:
Hillary knows how to cover her tracks, probably better than Donald does.
Click to expand...

Indeed, the utter lack of proof of crimes can only mean one thing: she is really sneaky.
 
Thoreau72 said:
Hillary knows how to cover her tracks, probably better than Donald does.
Click to expand...

And, of course, the best way to 'cover your tracks ' is never to have done it in the first place.
 
RAMOSS said:
And, of course, the best way to 'cover your tracks ' is never to have done it in the first place.
Click to expand...

I've got away with hundreds of crimes because I didn't commit them.
 
17 investigations over 35 years, all conducted by hostile Republican Committes, or by the FBI at the behest of Republicans, a 6 1/2 year Special Counsel's investigation, and endless harassment by Judicial Watch. Not a scrap evidence, a single witness, not one charge other than a lie about a blow job. Ken Starr jailed Katherine McDougall for an entire year for her refusal to implicate Clinton to the Grand Jury. She said she had nothing to give them, or she would have taken the "Get out of jail free card" and flipped. Both Ken Starr and James Comey offered immunity to a lot of people to get them to flip on the Clintons, and well many took immunity to protect themselves, but nobody gave investigators anything that would implicate either Bill or Hillary.

There's an old expression: "Three can keep a secret, if two of them are dead". We saw this with Richard Nixon. Someone always gets a conscience, or remembers their oath to uphold the Constitution and grows the spine. That's why conspiracy theories that Sandy Hook was a hoax perpetrated by crisis actors is just so laughable. It would take hundreds of people to pull of such a hoax, and the idea that no one of these hundreds of people would ever reveal the secret is laughable. There's always a Papadopolous who gets drunk and tells the wrong guy in a bar about the whole deal.

The last reason why I don't think the Clintons are guilty of anything, besides the total lack of evidence or witnesses, is that everything they have ever done has been investigated, and usually multiple times. If Hillary had jaywalked, the Republicans would have locked her up. If I knew that everything I ever did would be subject to FBI Investigation, I wouldn't breathe the wrong way, much less engage in bribery, corruption, and pay for play in the public realm.

Trump isn't that smart.
 
Dragonlady said:
17 investigations over 35 years, all conducted by hostile Republican Committes, or by the FBI at the behest of Republicans, a 6 1/2 year Special Counsel's investigation, and endless harassment by Judicial Watch. Not a scrap evidence, a single witness, not one charge other than a lie about a blow job. Ken Starr jailed Katherine McDougall for an entire year for her refusal to implicate Clinton to the Grand Jury. She said she had nothing to give them, or she would have taken the "Get out of jail free card" and flipped. Both Ken Starr and James Comey offered immunity to a lot of people to get them to flip on the Clintons, and well many took immunity to protect themselves, but nobody gave investigators anything that would implicate either Bill or Hillary.

There's an old expression: "Three can keep a secret, if two of them are dead". We saw this with Richard Nixon. Someone always gets a conscience, or remembers their oath to uphold the Constitution and grows the spine. That's why conspiracy theories that Sandy Hook was a hoax perpetrated by crisis actors is just so laughable. It would take hundreds of people to pull of such a hoax, and the idea that no one of these hundreds of people would ever reveal the secret is laughable. There's always a Papadopolous who gets drunk and tells the wrong guy in a bar about the whole deal.

The last reason why I don't think the Clintons are guilty of anything, besides the total lack of evidence or witnesses, is that everything they have ever done has been investigated, and usually multiple times. If Hillary had jaywalked, the Republicans would have locked her up. If I knew that everything I ever did would be subject to FBI Investigation, I wouldn't breathe the wrong way, much less engage in bribery, corruption, and pay for play in the public realm.

Trump isn't that smart.
Click to expand...
I tend not to believe in those conspiracy theories about her criminal conduct. . But I do think both she and Bill are perfectly capable of jaywalking.
 
NeverTrump said:
hmmm?? :shock:

Conspiracy theorists and QAnon believers linked Hillary Clinton to two shot state senators, 4 NYPD suicides, and the death of her brother. A month later, no links whatsoever have emerged and her arrest has not happened...
Click to expand...

They all got eaten by a giant Hyperbolus Contrivous monster.
 
lwf said:
The theory that Hillary has her rivals killed.
Click to expand...

CBS is mainstream media. It is the same "news organization" that told me lies about the San Bernardino shooting a few years back. They told the same lies about WMD and the other pro-war propaganda of the Bush administration. They told and retell the falsehoods about WTC attacks.

Why should I believe them now when so many other facts contradict their claims?
 
j brown's body said:
Indeed, the utter lack of proof of crimes can only mean one thing: she is really sneaky.
Click to expand...

Sneaky and well-connected.

As to "the utter lack of proof", that is very debatable.
 
RAMOSS said:
And, of course, the best way to 'cover your tracks ' is never to have done it in the first place.
Click to expand...

Thank you for stating the obvious, a brilliant contribution!
 
Thoreau72 said:
CBS is mainstream media. It is the same "news organization" that told me lies about the San Bernardino shooting a few years back. They told the same lies about WMD and the other pro-war propaganda of the Bush administration. They told and retell the falsehoods about WTC attacks.

Why should I believe them now when so many other facts contradict their claims?
Click to expand...

What were the lies they told about the San Bernardino shooting?
 
lwf said:
What were the lies they told about the San Bernardino shooting?
Click to expand...

The official story, that a man and his wife did the shooting.
 
Thoreau72 said:
Not according to two different eye witnesses to the event, one interviewed by Scott The Pelley.

YouTube
Click to expand...

So this husband and wife just happened to have tactical vests and assault rifles in their SUV and engaged in a running gun battle with police because they were innocent?

The third shooter report was investigated and it was determined that the eye witnesses were mistaken. There were just the two: Farook and Malik were radicalized by foreign terrorist websites and engaged in the terrorist attack without input from any known terrorist organizations. The only assistance they had was from a neighbor who pleaded guilty to providing material support to terrorists by purchasing the firearms for them.
 
lwf said:
So this husband and wife just happened to have tactical vests and assault rifles in their SUV and engaged in a running gun battle with police because they were innocent?

The third shooter report was investigated and it was determined that the eye witnesses were mistaken. There were just the two: Farook and Malik were radicalized by foreign terrorist websites and engaged in the terrorist attack without input from any known terrorist organizations. The only assistance they had was from a neighbor who pleaded guilty to providing material support to terrorists by purchasing the firearms for them.
Click to expand...

I have seen the vehicles of many friends with tactical vests and assault rifles inside, and none of them have ever killed anybody.

A recent story had a cop planting drug evidence in the vehicles of innocent citizens. Such stories have been around for decades at least. It is not difficult to do.

Two different witnesses on the scene described the same trio. The lady interviewed by CBS saw their arrival, and a male saw and described the same men leaving the scene.

You're free to believe Scott Pelley and "what the authorities told us", but I'll pass.

Many but not all of the "mass shootings" the media has inundated us with have been staged events. SB was certainly one of them. The agenda is gun control, and in the case of SB an anti-muslim spin was incorporated.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom