- Joined
- Nov 24, 2018
- Messages
- 13,199
- Reaction score
- 2,896
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
The conspiracy theory says that the US government was desperate to invade Iraq, and needed an excuse. So they put on this big show of multiple planes being hijacked and ramming buildings, in NYC and Washington DC.
The planes did not actually cause the destruction, it was explosives planted inside the buildings prior to the fake attack.
Problems, with that theory:
1. They probably didn't need 9/11 as an excuse for invading Iraq. No one thought Iraq had caused 9/11. The actual excuse was WMD, which resulted from incorrect intelligence, which everyone (including Democrats) believed.
2. There was no need for the airplane show. They could just have planted the explosives and said it had been done by terrorists.
I have never believed the 9/11 conspiracy theories. Not because I trust the government. Because they don't make sense.
There were suspicious things about the investigation, and maybe we were lied to (when are we ever not lied to by the government?). But the conspiracy theories still don't make sense.
The planes did not actually cause the destruction, it was explosives planted inside the buildings prior to the fake attack.
Problems, with that theory:
1. They probably didn't need 9/11 as an excuse for invading Iraq. No one thought Iraq had caused 9/11. The actual excuse was WMD, which resulted from incorrect intelligence, which everyone (including Democrats) believed.
2. There was no need for the airplane show. They could just have planted the explosives and said it had been done by terrorists.
I have never believed the 9/11 conspiracy theories. Not because I trust the government. Because they don't make sense.
There were suspicious things about the investigation, and maybe we were lied to (when are we ever not lied to by the government?). But the conspiracy theories still don't make sense.