• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

FBI Accused of Omitting Evidence From 9/11 Report

R

ralphcdp

Banned
Joined
Mar 14, 2019
Messages
1,093
Reaction score
63
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Courthouse News Service

Page not found |

FBI Accused of Omitting Evidence From 9/11 Report

March 26, 2019 JENNIFER HIJAZI

WASHINGTON (CN) – Nearly two decades after the deadly Sept. 11 attacks, a lawyers’ group claims the federal government did not properly assess evidence known to the FBI but left out of the 9/11 Review Commission findings, including reports of pre-placed explosives at the World Trade Center.


The Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry and Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth filed a complaint Monday against U.S. Attorney General William Barr and FBI Director Christopher Wray, claiming the FBI failed in its federally mandated duty to assess all the evidence available that previous 9/11 commissions may have missed.

“The FBI’s 9/11 Review Commission, and the FBI itself, failed to assess and report to Congress, as mandated, several other categories of significant 9/11 related evidence known to the FBI via reports in the press, via the web, and via public events and/or reflected in the FBI’s own records,” according to the lawsuit filed in Washington, D.C., federal court by lead attorney Mick Harrison.

...

The Justice Department did not immediately respond Tuesday morning to a request for comment.
Click to expand...

A tremendous amount of evidence has been uncovered since the 911 Ommission Commission filed its "set up to fail" conclusions about 9/11. This charade was orchestrated, organized, dictated to by Zelikow of the Bush/Cheney cabal who actually carried out the events of 9/11 that they speciously blamed on nonexistent Muslim hijackers and OBL, who had nothing to do with the events of 9/11.
 
ralphcdp said:
A tremendous amount of evidence has been uncovered since the 911 Ommission Commission filed its "set up to fail" conclusions about 9/11. This charade was orchestrated, organized, dictated to by Zelikow of the Bush/Cheney cabal who actually carried out the events of 9/11 that they speciously blamed on nonexistent Muslim hijackers and OBL, who had nothing to do with the events of 9/11.
Click to expand...

Still touting this nonsense?

Twenty threads of BS not enough?
 
Link does not work to Courthouse news service.

I bet this gets moved to the CT section before long.
 
As we've known since the beginning under J. Edgar, the FBI is a political organization with a political agenda. Their behavior on 911 showed it in spades, even though the also complicit media failed to write about it.

S. McIlwain described the FBI visiting her house that evening and basically asking her to change her story. She was a concerned citizen who had called the FBI that morning with information about what she saw.

Also in Shanksville, the FBI asked Wally Miller to change his story, and he did, which led to his diametrically opposed stories that day.

The Federal Bureau of Misinformation.
 
ralphcdp said:
A tremendous amount of evidence has been uncovered since the 911 Ommission Commission filed its "set up to fail" conclusions about 9/11. This charade was orchestrated, organized, dictated to by Zelikow of the Bush/Cheney cabal who actually carried out the events of 9/11 that they speciously blamed on nonexistent Muslim hijackers and OBL, who had nothing to do with the events of 9/11.
Click to expand...

God Bless you.
 
ralphcdp said:
A tremendous amount of evidence has been uncovered since the 911 Ommission Commission filed its "set up to fail" conclusions about 9/11. This charade was orchestrated, organized, dictated to by Zelikow of the Bush/Cheney cabal who actually carried out the events of 9/11 that they speciously blamed on nonexistent Muslim hijackers and OBL, who had nothing to do with the events of 9/11.
Click to expand...

What evidence is that
 
Deuce said:
What evidence is that
Click to expand...

The evidence that know nothing metabunkers have been denying for years without ever having any evidence themselves.
 
ralphcdp said:
The evidence that know nothing metabunkers have been denying for years without ever having any evidence themselves.
Click to expand...

Oh I'm sorry I thought you actually had something to show me
 
Deuce said:
Oh I'm sorry I thought you actually had something to show me
Click to expand...

When the grand jury returns indictments you'll have lots to see. When the lawsuit against the FBI and the US Dept of Justice moves into court you will also have a lot to see.
 
Truthers accused of never answering questions and failing to provide a full alternative 911 theory!
 
Deuce said:
I'm not convinced that's a real word.
Click to expand...

It definitely is. Some metabunkers denied its existence and even had the temerity to pretend they didn't know the meaning or where it comes from when they knew full well. They caught themselves out as they always do as soon as they actually try to discuss the issues.

Are you a metabunker?
 
http://action.ae911truth.org/o/50694/t/0/blastContent.jsp?email_blast_KEY=1399552

"We’re also thrilled to report that, in the four days since this effort was launched, you’ve helped us raise nearly $24,000 of the $30,000 needed to fund the first phase of the FBI Lawsuit.

If you haven’t chipped in yet and wish to support this historic litigation against the FBI for its failure to assess and report crucial 9/11 evidence, please take a moment to do so today. On behalf of the Lawyers’ Committee, Bob McIlvaine and Barbara Krukowski-Rastelli (our co-plaintiffs), we are very grateful for your unyielding commitment to this transformative cause. You are making the difference!"

How many AE911T LC supporters here on DP have contributed to the effort? If not, why?
 
ralphcdp said:
It definitely is. Some metabunkers denied its existence and even had the temerity to pretend they didn't know the meaning or where it comes from when they knew full well. They caught themselves out as they always do as soon as they actually try to discuss the issues.

Are you a metabunker?
Click to expand...

I've heard the term. I don't think it makes sense. It appears to be some amalgamation of "debunk" and "meta," but combining the two this way doesn't make any sense. I am not one of these, because the term is nonsensical.

Now it's my turn to ask a question: is there a reason you're dodging and attacking me personally, instead of actually presenting evidence? Are you trying to hide something? Are you part of the coverup? Because only a person in on the coverup would try and hide evidence that debunks 9/11.
 
NWO_Spook said:
Is there anything new on this subject?
Click to expand...

There's always new interpretations of the information available!

We went from "it was missiles/military aircraft" through "thermite charges" through "nuclear demolition without radiation somehow" and then there was the x-ray laser cannonball that was inexplicably visible and subsonic in velocity.

The thing about conspiracy theories isn't so much working from a set of inaccurate facts, it's having utterly ridiculous interpretations of things that are factual. Some people hear hoofbeats and think horses. Other people think zebras. Conspiracy theorists think unicorns and centaurs.
 
Deuce said:
I've heard the term. I don't think it makes sense. It appears to be some amalgamation of "debunk" and "meta," but combining the two this way doesn't make any sense. I am not one of these, because the term is nonsensical.
Click to expand...

The metabunkers already tried this nonsense. What you think doesn't matter.

Now it's my turn to ask a question: is there a reason you're dodging and attacking me personally, instead of actually presenting evidence?
Click to expand...

I haven't attacked you at all. But nice try. It sure sounds like you're a metabunker.


Are you trying to hide something? Are you part of the coverup?
Click to expand...

Coverups are the province of US governments and their little aids, the metabunkers. Are you a metabunker?

The grand jury investigating the CDs of WTCs 1, 2 & 7 and the lawsuit against the FBI and the US Dept of Justice will bring this US governments charade to an end.

Are you actually trying to provide cover for those who have murdered some 6000 Americans/westerners?

Because only a person in on the coverup would try and hide evidence that debunks 9/11.
Click to expand...

Correct, that is folks like mickey metabunker and the metabunkers. Why are you spending so much time talking nonsense? It's like you are a metabunker too for they never provide any evidence because there isn't any for the US governments' impossible 9/11 story.

Has the US government got any date/time stamped photos of Muslim hijackers from any of the CCTV cameras at departing airports?
 
ralphcdp said:
The metabunkers already tried this nonsense. What you think doesn't matter.



I haven't attacked you at all. But nice try. It sure sounds like you're a metabunker.




Coverups are the province of US governments and their little aids, the metabunkers. Are you a metabunker?

The grand jury investigating the CDs of WTCs 1, 2 & 7 and the lawsuit against the FBI and the US Dept of Justice will bring this US governments charade to an end.

Are you actually trying to provide cover for those who have murdered some 6000 Americans/westerners?



Correct, that is folks like mickey metabunker and the metabunkers. Why are you spending so much time talking nonsense? It's like you are a metabunker too for they never provide any evidence because there isn't any for the US governments' impossible 9/11 story.

Has the US government got any date/time stamped photos of Muslim hijackers from any of the CCTV cameras at departing airports?
Click to expand...

I asked for the evidence you claimed was in abundance. Yours is the extraordinary claim, the burden is upon you to support it.
 
NWO_Spook said:
Is there anything new on this subject?
Click to expand...

Lots, why don't you know? You have made claims to being informed. metabunkers never discuss these things. They just talk about scientists, engineers, architects, physicists, ... who actually know things about the science and evidence.

See the response from Deuce, the newest metabunker, below.
 
Deuce said:
I asked for the evidence you claimed was in abundance. Yours is the extraordinary claim, the burden is upon you to support it.
Click to expand...

Not at all. The evidence is in and it is headed to the grand jury and the lawsuit. metabunkers are just whistling in the dark, as always. And really, you don't have any shame supporting the murderers of all these millions of people, westerners, Iraqis, Afghans, Syrians, Libyans, ... .

Don't metabunkers have any sense of shame?
 
Deuce said:
There's always new interpretations of the information available!

We went from "it was missiles/military aircraft" through "thermite charges" through "nuclear demolition without radiation somehow" and then there was the x-ray laser cannonball that was inexplicably visible and subsonic in velocity.

The thing about conspiracy theories isn't so much working from a set of inaccurate facts, it's having utterly ridiculous interpretations of things that are factual. Some people hear hoofbeats and think horses. Other people think zebras. Conspiracy theorists think unicorns and centaurs.
Click to expand...

I just hadn't heard any new theories in the last few years and I keep seeing the same old debunked noise. None of those you mentioned are all that new.
 
ralphcdp said:
See the response from Deuce, the newest metabunker, below.
Click to expand...

Ahh, so "metabunker" just means "person who doesn't immediately accept what I say at face value?" Is that it? A person who asks for evidence is a metabunker?
 
Deuce said:
Ahh, so "metabunker" just means "person who doesn't immediately accept what I say at face value?" Is that it? A person who asks for evidence is a metabunker?
Click to expand...

I think this individual has a problem with the site, Metabunk ~ a site that exposes conspiracy theories through evaluation of the evidence. So, all those who question the conspiracy theories are simply 'metabunkers'.
 
ralphcdp said:
Not at all. The evidence is in and it is headed to the grand jury and the lawsuit. metabunkers are just whistling in the dark, as always. And really, you don't have any shame supporting the murderers of all these millions of people, westerners, Iraqis, Afghans, Syrians, Libyans, ... .

Don't metabunkers have any sense of shame?
Click to expand...

Is this how you handle anyone who asks you simple questions? Let's say you meet someone from South Africa. They're early twenties. They know of 9/11/01, but they were a child at the time and it was half a world away. They don't have the visceral response we do as Americans who are 30s or older. They've never really thought a lot about the whole situation because it really doesn't affect them. So they hear you have this other idea that the US government was secretly behind the whole thing. They ask you how that works, for the evidence.

Is this really how you'd respond to them? Lash out with a ludicrous label, as if that absolves you of any responsibility to provide evidence when you're accusing someone of high treason? Tell them they're complicit in the deaths of literally everyone who has died at the hands of American troops, worldwide, for nearly twenty years?

People would take you more seriously if you weren't so utterly filled with hate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom