• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

FBI Accused of Omitting Evidence From 9/11 Report

mike2810 said:
I'll bite. What is your expertise and qualification, ralphcpd?
Click to expand...

That is of no concern whatsoever. As I have mentioned there are thousands of science professionals doing the work that is going to the grand jury.


metabunkers have zero qualifications and zero expertise. Look at mickey metabunker. And he is your leader.
 
ralphcdp said:
Science and evidence from thousands of science professionals. Science backed up by experiment. Something NIST never did. Experiment is the foundation of science. Take this and help the metabunkers get up to speed.

Stop lamely trying to provide cover for murderers.
Click to expand...

Yet there are many more science professionals, engineers, etc. who disagree with the 3000 members who joined AE911T. Are you saying all those who disagree with AE911T are liars? Interesting how Harrit's experiment could not be duplicated by Basile. Millette and others disagree with NH.

You should really broaden your reading if you want to educate yourself regarding 9/11.

Why don't you give specific names of who the murderers are.

Maybe Dr. Hulsey will release his final on WTC7 on April 1.:lamo
 
Last edited:
ralphcdp said:
That is of no concern whatsoever. As I have mentioned there are thousands of science professionals doing the work that is going to the grand jury.


metabunkers have zero qualifications and zero expertise. Look at mickey metabunker. And he is your leader.
Click to expand...

You have no expertise or qualifications to make any statement beyond a personal opinion regarding 9/11. Sorry, but what you require of others should apply to you.
So you posts are mute. (moot)

Ever wonder why NHarrit work has not been duplicated. When some have tried it comes up zero for nanothermite.
 
Last edited:
mike2810 said:
Yet there are many more science professionals, engineers, etc. who disagree with the 3000 members who joined AE911T.
Click to expand...

How come metabunkers fly with their own drivel if there are so many pros out there?
 
ralphcdp said:
It's not 'mute'. metabunkers???!!!!
Click to expand...

I will take that is you have no qualifications or expertise.

mute:
refraining from speech or temporarily speechless.

moot:
open to question
 
Last edited:
mike2810 said:
I will take that is you have no qualifications or expertise.

mute:
refraining from speech or temporarily speechless.

moot:
open to question
Click to expand...

You even changed your post. metabunkers??!!!!
 
ralphcdp said:
You even changed your post. metabunkers??!!!!
Click to expand...

yep. I added a word.

Unless you want to list your qualifications I will take it as you are not qualified. It is interesting how you find grammar errors as a way to dodge answering simple questions.
If you read some older 9/11 threads you will find some of my qualifications, education and expertise.

Using only AE911T and the LC for AE911T as your primary source of information does not tell you everything you should know about 9/11. One could say it is biased towards the goal Gage, et.al has.
 
mike2810 said:
yep. I added a word.

Unless you want to list your qualifications I will take it as you are not qualified. It is interesting how you find grammar errors as a way to dodge answering simple questions.
If you read some older 9/11 threads you will find some of my qualifications, education and expertise.

Using only AE911T and the LC for AE911T as your primary source of information does not tell you everything you should know about 9/11. One could say it is biased towards the goal Gage, et.al has.
Click to expand...


His English is just appalling. Notice he failed to capitalise his use of the term 'Metabunkers', and he followed it with six punctuation marks: two question marks and four exclamations.

I've seen atrocious grammar before, but this is just beyond understanding. Obviously he isn't qualified enough to discuss this subject.

Those who frequent this sub-forum will understand the satire.
 
Last edited:
NWO_Spook said:
His English is just appalling. Notice he failed to capitalise his use of the term Metabunkers, and he followed it with six punctuation marks: two question marks and four exclamations.

Just appalling and obviously he isn't qualified to discuss this subject.
Click to expand...

May be time for me to back off this thread with ralph. Information is limited on what is happening with the case against the FBI. I take the information from AE911T LC with a grain of salt. The information is biased. imo, there has been enough research by independent sources that confirm much of what the "official" reports say about 9/11 is true.

The Husley report will be an interesting read.
 
mike2810 said:
May be time for me to back off this thread with ralph. Information is limited on what is happening with the case against the FBI. I take the information from AE911T LC with a grain of salt. The information is biased. imo, there has been enough research by independent sources that confirm much of what the "official" reports say about 9/11 is true.

The Husley report will be an interesting read.
Click to expand...

I hope it comes out soon. We've been waiting for it at ISF for some time and more than a few don't believe it will ever be released. One member stated that "the unbelievable self-inflicted beclowning of truthers continues apace".
 
Last edited:
mike2810 said:
yep. I added a word.

It is interesting how you find grammar errors as a way to dodge answering simple questions.
Click to expand...

You added a word because you knew you had made a mistake. Your error was not a grammar error but you don't even understand these basic things.
 
NWO_Spook said:
We've been waiting for it at ISF for some time and more than a few don't believe it will ever be released. One member stated that "the unbelievable self-inflicted beclowning of truthers continues apace".
Click to expand...

ISF = International Science Frauds

Has your illustrious group done any "scientific" studies?
 
mike2810 said:
May be time for me to back off this thread with ralph.
Click to expand...

metabunkers!!! You all keep saying this. It's one of your favorite memes. Is it mickey metabunker approved?



Information is limited on what is happening with the case against the FBI. I take the information from AE911T LC with a grain of salt. The information is biased. imo, there has been enough research by independent sources that confirm much of what the "official" reports say about 9/11 is true.

The Husley report will be an interesting read.
Click to expand...

Absolutely no evidence there, as always, from the metabunkers.
 
NWO_Spook said:
His English is just appalling. Notice he failed to capitalise his use of the term 'Metabunkers', and he followed it with six punctuation marks: two question marks and four exclamations.

I've seen atrocious grammar before, but this is just beyond understanding. Obviously he isn't qualified enough to discuss this subject.
Click to expand...

You're American. You wouldn't know grammar from a pig's head. Punctuation is not grammar. Better read your S and W again.

Language (including grammar, which is formation and arrangement of words into constituents)
evolved as spoken language, for a million years or so. Humans co-evolved with spoken languages, and every normal human learns at least one spoken language long before their formal literacy training (i.e, school) starts. If it ever starts -- most humans are, and always have been, illiterate.

So the answer is no, neither capitalization nor punctuation are part of grammar. If English were capitalized and punctuated like German (which has quite different rules from English), it would still just be written English, and no grammatical rules would be involved.

meaning - Do capitalization and punctuation fall under the category of grammar? - English Language & Usage Stack Exchange
Click to expand...
 
mike2810 said:
So what is your qualification and expertise to comment on my English?
Click to expand...

You wouldn't understand it even if I explained it to you in elementary school language. What it shows is that you are not remotely qualified to speak on science issues. That, in and of itself, is readily apparent because metabunkers never discuss the science or the EVIDENCE.
 
ralphcdp said:
You're American. You wouldn't know grammar from a pig's head. Punctuation is not grammar. Better read your S and W again.
Click to expand...

I know he's banned but I have to disprove this baloney. I'm Australian and punctuation marks do indeed form part of English Grammar and your link does not address that in any way.

There are 14 punctuation marks that are commonly used in English grammar. They are the period, question mark, exclamation point, comma, semicolon, colon, dash, hyphen, parentheses, brackets, braces, apostrophe, quotation marks, and ellipsis.

This guy just makes it up as he goes along.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom