• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

FBI being sued by Lawyer's Committee, Families, AE911T to present evidence as required by Congress

NWO_Spook said:
I didn't 'buy' anything ~ I investigated the evidence.
Click to expand...

If that's the case, you are a horrible investigator. I hope nobody is paying you to "investigate".
 
Thoreau72 said:
If that's the case, you are a horrible investigator. I hope nobody is paying you to "investigate".
Click to expand...

Your ad hominem attack is noted and is fallacious. Of course, you are simply baiting me into losing my temper in order to earn a thread ban.

I don't fall for that strategy, fellow.
 
NWO_Spook said:
Your ad hominem attack is noted and is fallacious. Of course, you are simply baiting me into losing my temper in order to earn a thread ban.

I don't fall for that strategy, fellow.
Click to expand...

It is interesting for HD (T72) accuses someone of falling for something. He has accepted parts of the nuke explanation and to not offend Gage (AE911T) he includes nanothermite. Pretty weak mini neutron bombs if they need assistance from nanothermite to destroy a building. :lamo

There are a couple of posters who try the "bait" tactic.

Seems that one of the LC lawyers ethics are in question. Something to do about rules for non profits and how board members can be paid.
 
mike2810 said:
It is interesting for HD (T72) accuses someone of falling for something.
Click to expand...

I just play along with their silliness. I don't take them seriously and I know what they're trying to do, and that is, bait one into an infraction. I don't fall for that game.

He has accepted parts of the nuke explanation and to not offend Gage (AE911T) he includes nanothermite. Pretty weak mini neutron bombs if they need assistance from nanothermite to destroy a building. :lamo
Click to expand...

Yes, it's amazing how they can 'rationalise' two or more CT's simultaneously. Even when they openly conflict, but I suppose we are applying logic to the irrational.

There are a couple of posters who try the "bait" tactic.
Click to expand...

It's a very old truther ploy.

Seems that one of the LC lawyers ethics are in question. Something to do about rules for non profits and how board members can be paid.
Click to expand...

Interesting. Do tell.
 
NWO_Spook said:
I just play along with their silliness. I don't take them seriously and I know what they're trying to do, and that is, bait one into an infraction. I don't fall for that game.



Yes, it's amazing how they can 'rationalise' two or more CT's simultaneously. Even when they openly conflict, but I suppose we are applying logic to the irrational.



It's a very old truther ploy.



Interesting. Do tell.
Click to expand...

Discussion can be found at:

Lawyers' Committee for 9/11 Inquiry and AE911Truth File Lawsuit Against FBI | Metabunk
 
NWO_Spook said:
That is very interesting. It appears the entire case is but a scam to enrich one of the site directors who is also the lawyer. As a friend of mine in that thread noted, there is still the problem of presenting a prima facie case for acceptance of the suit.

This is just a scam feeding off those gullible enough to contribute.
Click to expand...

What was interesting was the LC (AE911T site) originally stated they needed $30K by April 1 to move forward. Now its $60K by April 15 since they met the 30K. Wonder if it was an early April fools joke for the 30K by the first. :lamo

My bet is AE911T will never be satisfied unless the "official report" states it was controlled demolition. AE911T and those who support them didn't trust the govt. back then. Why would they trust them now.
 
mike2810 said:
What was interesting was the LC (AE911T site) originally stated they needed $30K by April 1 to move forward. Now its $60K by April 15 since they met the 30K. Wonder if it was an early April fools joke for the 30K by the first. :lamo

My bet is AE911T will never be satisfied unless the "official report" states it was controlled demolition. AE911T and those who support them didn't trust the govt. back then. Why would they trust them now.
Click to expand...

Oh, they will never be satisfied, and their handlers will make sure of that because they don't want to see the gravy train grind to a halt. This pattern has been repeated in the studies and other so-called 'initiatives' Gage has launched. Gage is on a winner and I'm sure he wants to ensure it stays that way.
 
mike2810 said:
What was interesting was the LC (AE911T site) originally stated they needed $30K by April 1 to move forward. Now its $60K by April 15 since they met the 30K. Wonder if it was an early April fools joke for the 30K by the first.
Click to expand...

You are making things up.

My bet is AE911T will never be satisfied unless the "official report" states it was controlled demolition. AE911T and those who support them didn't trust the govt. back then. Why would they trust them now.
Click to expand...

The official report was a fraud beginning to end. It was three controlled demolitions, WTCs 1, 2 & 7. The grand jury will know this when they see the evidence.

Because metabunkers know this full well because they have never been able to produce any evidence for the "official report".

Any luck with the evidence promised from Bush, Blair, COLON Powell for OBL involvement. It never came. Any luck with the photos of the Muslim "hijackers"?
 
ralphcdp said:
You are making things up.



The official report was a fraud beginning to end. It was three controlled demolitions, WTCs 1, 2 & 7. The grand jury will know this when they see the evidence.

Because metabunkers know this full well because they have never been able to produce any evidence for the "official report".

Any luck with the evidence promised from Bush, Blair, COLON Powell for OBL involvement. It never came. Any luck with the photos of the Muslim "hijackers"?
Click to expand...

People deep in denial do not realize they have been fooled. Indeed, it is easier to fool a man than it is to explain to him that he has been fooled.
 
Thoreau72 said:
People deep in denial do not realize they have been fooled. Indeed, it is easier to fool a man than it is to explain to him that he has been fooled.
Click to expand...

perhaps you are an example?
 
Perhaps one day Thoreau72 will realize that he has been fooled.
 
SanderO said:
perhaps you are an example?
Click to expand...

Not on this matter. For about 5 years, blissfully ignorant and too busy to investigate, I believed the official fairy tale. Rational analysis changed things greatly. Buyer Beware: becoming free from cognitive dissonance can be a painful experience. Realizing that one has been tricked can be painful and embarrassing.
 
Thoreau72 said:
Not on this matter. For about 5 years, blissfully ignorant and too busy to investigate, I believed the official fairy tale. Rational analysis changed things greatly. Buyer Beware: becoming free from cognitive dissonance can be a painful experience. Realizing that one has been tricked can be painful and embarrassing.
Click to expand...

Henry... I don't care what you or anyone else chooses to belief. It has no impact on anything. In fact personal beliefs are a protected right by the constitution and as such beliefs such as religion and scientology and off course 911 conspiracy can exist. They cannot however advocate or harm people. In some cases conspiracy believes like Alex Jones are engaging in cruel and harmful speech and will pay a price for it. No one cares about someone like Steven Jones or Niels Harit's screeds. And almost everyone who listen to them dismisses the ideas as baseless.

Some people spend time in "debunking" false idea out there. I consider that a waste of time. When someone is emotionally and intellectually incapable of understanding it is a waste of effort. Anyone who wants to be informed can inform themselves. Most choose to remain willfully ignorant and are content with how they view the word. Ignorance is bliss.
 
SanderO said:
Henry... I don't care what you or anyone else chooses to belief. It has no impact on anything. In fact personal beliefs are a protected right by the constitution and as such beliefs such as religion and scientology and off course 911 conspiracy can exist. They cannot however advocate or harm people. In some cases conspiracy believes like Alex Jones are engaging in cruel and harmful speech and will pay a price for it. No one cares about someone like Steven Jones or Niels Harit's screeds. And almost everyone who listen to them dismisses the ideas as baseless.

Some people spend time in "debunking" false idea out there. I consider that a waste of time. When someone is emotionally and intellectually incapable of understanding it is a waste of effort. Anyone who wants to be informed can inform themselves. Most choose to remain willfully ignorant and are content with how they view the word. Ignorance is bliss.
Click to expand...

Well thank you Geoffrey, so much!

We agree that any person can believe as they wish.

Should I be forced to pretend that the official story is legitimate?
 
Thoreau72 said:
Well thank you Geoffrey, so much!

We agree that any person can believe as they wish.

Should I be forced to pretend that the official story is legitimate?
Click to expand...

Some people like to join others like to lead... Some like to debate other like to study... Some like to practice gotcha and oneupsmanship others can't be bothered.

As I have said many times my interest in 911 was to understand the collapses with the limits of my technical background and the data/evidence I could find... basically on the web. I have no means to "prove" or verify the reliability of online data. I found the 911forum was very helpful in furthering my understanding. Other sites much less so.

Terrorism will not end as long as the powerful oppress and disenfranchise the weak... leaving them only terrorism as a means to fight back. There is no end in sight into the foreseeable future where there is no terrorism.
 
Thoreau72 said:
Not on this matter. For about 5 years, blissfully ignorant and too busy to investigate, I believed the official fairy tale. Rational analysis changed things greatly. Buyer Beware: becoming free from cognitive dissonance can be a painful experience. Realizing that one has been tricked can be painful and embarrassing.
Click to expand...

You can't claim rational analysis while believing in things like radiationless nukes or subsonic, visible x-rays.
 
Deuce said:
You can't claim rational analysis while believing in things like radiationless nukes or subsonic, visible x-rays.
Click to expand...

I don't believe in those things, but you must tell yourself I do so that your dissonance will be rationalized. CD playing out.
 
Thoreau72 said:
I don't believe in those things, but you must tell yourself I do so that your dissonance will be rationalized. CD playing out.
Click to expand...

Yes you do.

You've repeatedly said nuclear weapons were used, and you showed us blurry footage of one of the impacts and proclaimed that because you couldn't tell it was an airplane, it was probably an x-ray laser cannon ball.
 
Deuce said:
Yes you do.

You've repeatedly said nuclear weapons were used, and you showed us blurry footage of one of the impacts and proclaimed that because you couldn't tell it was an airplane, it was probably an x-ray laser cannon ball.
Click to expand...

Your quote Ace, was that I believed in radiationless nukes. I do not believe in radiationless nukes, but if you need to believe that I do, have at it. Ignorance is bliss, and I hope you are in a state of bliss. Whatever blows your skirt Ace. :mrgreen:
 
Thoreau72 said:
Your quote Ace, was that I believed in radiationless nukes. I do not believe in radiationless nukes, but if you need to believe that I do, have at it. Ignorance is bliss, and I hope you are in a state of bliss. Whatever blows your skirt Ace. :mrgreen:
Click to expand...

No radiation was detected, anywhere. Not one diagnosis of radiation poisoning. You're admitting you believe nuclear weapons were present despite the fact that zero evidence supports it.

And don't pretend you didn't invent xray laser cannons based on crappy security camera footage. You posted that here, why would you lie about it?
 
Deuce said:
No radiation was detected, anywhere. Not one diagnosis of radiation poisoning. You're admitting you believe nuclear weapons were present despite the fact that zero evidence supports it.

And don't pretend you didn't invent xray laser cannons based on crappy security camera footage. You posted that here, why would you lie about it?
Click to expand...

That is your dissonant view sir, not reality.

Unbeknownst to you, a huge number of first responders were made sick that day, and various nuclear decontamination protocols were in action at Ground Zero. Who the heck started calling it Ground Zero? Oh yeah, the media did. Was that a Freudian slip?

The state of New York even brought the Zadroga Bill into existence, to deal with those sick first responders.

Their sickness was caused by radiation. Matt Tartaglia talked about it all. At some point his teeth fell out, as happens with irradiated humans, and he died.

Fox News and the MSM never discussed those things, so in your narrowly defined world view, it never happened.

Enjoy your bliss Deuce, you deserve the bliss brought by ignorance. :peace
 
Thoreau72 said:
That is your dissonant view sir, not reality.

Unbeknownst to you, a huge number of first responders were made sick that day,
Click to expand...
False. I am aware of this. "Sick" doesn't prove "radiation poisoning.
and various nuclear decontamination protocols were in action at Ground Zero.
Click to expand...
No. Decontamination protocols were in action. The site contained tons of toxic materials. You invented the nuclear part.

Who the heck started calling it Ground Zero? Oh yeah, the media did. Was that a Freudian slip?
Click to expand...
Irrelevant.

The state of New York even brought the Zadroga Bill into existence, to deal with those sick first responders.

Their sickness was caused by radiation. Matt Tartaglia talked about it all. At some point his teeth fell out, as happens with irradiated humans, and he died.

Fox News and the MSM never discussed those things, so in your narrowly defined world view, it never happened.

Enjoy your bliss Deuce, you deserve the bliss brought by ignorance. :peace
Click to expand...

Do you think radiation is the only thing that causes teeth to fall out?


How did that much radiation exist in NYC and never once be detected? All you had to do was buy a geiger counter and walk around the area. If that much radiation was present, you'd still be able to detect it today. So go prove it, buddy.
 
Thoreau72 said:
That is your dissonant view sir, not reality.

Unbeknownst to you, a huge number of first responders were made sick that day, and various nuclear decontamination protocols were in action at Ground Zero. Who the heck started calling it Ground Zero? Oh yeah, the media did. Was that a Freudian slip?

The state of New York even brought the Zadroga Bill into existence, to deal with those sick first responders.

Their sickness was caused by radiation. Matt Tartaglia talked about it all. At some point his teeth fell out, as happens with irradiated humans, and he died.

Fox News and the MSM never discussed those things, so in your narrowly defined world view, it never happened.

Enjoy your bliss Deuce, you deserve the bliss brought by ignorance. :peace
Click to expand...

Interesting how first responders who never worked the 9/11 site have the same illness. What the science is finding it is the small particulates that are inhaled . Even some wildland firefighters have come down with the same illness. In older threads links to medical research was provided. Look it up.

So explain how some firefighters who never worked the site are developing the same type of cancer and respiratory problems. Show us the source you used to conclude the illness is from radiation.

Your false information has no bounds. You should be ashamed posting opinions you cannot back up. Sorry T, this is one of the many areas I have kept up with because it is also affects wildland firefighters. The component of smoke that first responders breathe in can be an issue and lead to health problems. Your out of your league on this issue. You have been duped.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom