- Joined
- Jan 3, 2014
- Messages
- 16,501
- Reaction score
- 3,829
- Location
- Sheffield
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Are there any conspirices that you believe
Only ...
Xelor signature line: Those who jettison the epistemological standards of science are no longer in a position to use their intellectual product to make any claims about what is true of the world or to dispute the others’ claims about what is true. - Tooby & Cosmides
That certainly covers all those who believe in the US governments' crazy 9/11 conspiracy theory. Obviously you don't believe in the US governments' crazy 9/11 conspiracy theory or you wouldn't have such a signature line.
I think there's plenty of information that hasn't been made public about the JFK assassination, but I'm not sure that is a conspiracy by itself.
Only the ones proven existential in courts of law.
1. None.Only the ones proven existential in courts of law.Are there any conspirices [sic] that you believe
What examples might you offer in that category? Are there any at all like that?
Red:
When it comes to conspiracy theories, their progenitors, proselytizers, and partisans, as Miss Greene used to say, "Better get on outta here with that foolishness. I don't have time for that."
There are many who believe in the US governments' 9/11 conspiracy theory and they are the wackiest conspiracy theorists of all time 'cause there isn't one piece of evidence to support it.
All conspiracy theorists are more than I can bear when they start spewing that crap.
You must be completely sick of the unrelenting conspiracy theory drivel that the US/UK/Canada/... has been spewing out since 9/11.
You must be completely sick of the unrelenting conspiracy theory drivel that the US/UK/Canada/... has been spewing out since 9/11.
In a word, yes.
In a word, yes.
I should be clear. It's the conspiracy theories (CTs) themselves, and their progenitors, proselytizers and partisans that I object to, not from whom or whence CTs issue.
Conspiracies obviously happen, but as far as what we call “conspiracy theories” not really. I mean, I do tend to believe some shady things went on and evidence may have been tampered with in order to close the JFK case without any loose ends, but I still think Oswald did the deed on his own that day.
I get that. You are sick of the Bush/Cheney government starting their 9/11 conspiracy nonsense and Obama continuing it.
You know, I'm getting tired of your responses to me. You keep trying to tell me what I think, what I'm sick of, etc.
I have stated what I think about conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorists.
I have made a general statement about what I think about conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorists, and I don't appreciate your trying to inject more specificity into my remarks than I have. If I were of a mind to refer expressly to any specific person or idea, I am both literate enough and capable of doing so, and had I wanted to, I would have done so.
- I have not specified anything about anyone who you happen to construe as conspiracy theorists.
- I have not identified anyone as a conspiracy theorist.
- I have not identified any conspiracy theories.
You know, I'm getting tired of your responses to me. You keep trying to tell me what I think, what I'm sick of, etc.
I have stated what I think about conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorists.
I have made a general statement about what I think about conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorists, and I don't appreciate your trying to inject more specificity into my remarks than I have. If I were of a mind to refer expressly to any specific person or idea, I am both literate enough and capable of doing so, and had I wanted to, I would have done so.
- I have not specified anything about anyone who you happen to construe as conspiracy theorists.
- I have not identified anyone as a conspiracy theorist.
- I have not identified any conspiracy theories.
If you believe I have not analysed your comments accurately then please illustrate where I went wrong.