• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Are there any conspirices that you believe

Tim the plumber

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 3, 2014
Messages
16,501
Reaction score
3,829
Location
Sheffield
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
Try this one, a cover up of pedophilia;

YouTube

Establishment co-ordinated destruction of the story and anybody who steps forward to expose it.
 
Does organized Religion count as a conspiracy? I guess that's more of a cult where it's generally only one person doing most of the lying and a bunch of morons believing it.

I guess you certainly could classify the Catholic Churches cover-up of pedophilia within the priesthood a conspiracy, but that's kind of been exposed at this point.

Santa Claus not existing...that's one.

There's a part of me that honestly thinks Princess Diana faked her death.

I might classify trickle-down economics as a conspiracy, but I think most of the idiots who advocate it genuinely do believe what they're telling people.
 
I think there's plenty of information that hasn't been made public about the JFK assassination, but I'm not sure that is a conspiracy by itself.
 
I'm not interested in pedophilia, thanks Tim the P.
 
There is the craziest, void of any evidence conspiracy of all time that lots of people believe, that is the US governments' story about 9/11. There were no Muslim hijackers - not one time/date stamped photo of any of them from any of the airports they were alleged to have departed from. Voluminous other scientific evidence that clearly illustrates that it is impossible for there to have been hijackers.
 

Xelor signature line: Those who jettison the epistemological standards of science are no longer in a position to use their intellectual product to make any claims about what is true of the world or to dispute the others’ claims about what is true. - Tooby & Cosmides

That certainly covers all those who believe in the US governments' crazy 9/11 conspiracy theory. Obviously you don't believe in the US governments' crazy 9/11 conspiracy theory or you wouldn't have such a signature line.
 
Xelor signature line: Those who jettison the epistemological standards of science are no longer in a position to use their intellectual product to make any claims about what is true of the world or to dispute the others’ claims about what is true. - Tooby & Cosmides

That certainly covers all those who believe in the US governments' crazy 9/11 conspiracy theory. Obviously you don't believe in the US governments' crazy 9/11 conspiracy theory or you wouldn't have such a signature line.

Red:
When it comes to conspiracy theories, their progenitors, proselytizers, and partisans, as Miss Greene used to say, "Better get on outta here with that foolishness. I don't have time for that."
 
I think there's plenty of information that hasn't been made public about the JFK assassination, but I'm not sure that is a conspiracy by itself.

If the effort to keep it secret is not a conspiracy, what do you think it might be?
 
Only the ones proven existential in courts of law.

What examples might you offer in that category? Are there any at all like that?
 
Are there any conspirices [sic] that you believe
Only the ones proven existential in courts of law.
What examples might you offer in that category? Are there any at all like that?
1. None.
2. No.
Does that those are my answers to your inquiries tell you, now, what must be my answer to the title question?



Off-topic postscript:
No, the misspelling isn't mine. It's the OP-er's that I copied and paste-quoted from the thread's title.​
 
Red:
When it comes to conspiracy theories, their progenitors, proselytizers, and partisans, as Miss Greene used to say, "Better get on outta here with that foolishness. I don't have time for that."

There are many who believe in the US governments' 9/11 conspiracy theory and they are the wackiest conspiracy theorists of all time 'cause there isn't one piece of evidence to support it.
 
There are many who believe in the US governments' 9/11 conspiracy theory and they are the wackiest conspiracy theorists of all time 'cause there isn't one piece of evidence to support it.

Red:
I'll just take your word for that. All conspiracy theorists are more than I can bear when they start spewing that crap.
 
All conspiracy theorists are more than I can bear when they start spewing that crap.

You must be completely sick of the unrelenting conspiracy theory drivel that the US/UK/Canada/... has been spewing out since 9/11.
 
You must be completely sick of the unrelenting conspiracy theory drivel that the US/UK/Canada/... has been spewing out since 9/11.

In a word, yes.


I should be clear. It's the conspiracy theories (CTs) themselves, and their progenitors, proselytizers and partisans that I object to, not from whom or whence CTs issue.

From Post 8:
When it comes to conspiracy theories, their progenitors, proselytizers, and partisans, as Miss Greene used to say, "Better get on outta here with that foolishness. I don't have time for that."
 
Conspiracies obviously happen, but as far as what we call “conspiracy theories” not really. I mean, I do tend to believe some shady things went on and evidence may have been tampered with in order to close the JFK case without any loose ends, but I still think Oswald did the deed on his own that day.
 
In a word, yes.

Then you almost certainly will be pleased to hear about the US Federal grand jury that is investigating the controlled demolitions of WTCs 1, 2 & 7.
 
I should be clear. It's the conspiracy theories (CTs) themselves, and their progenitors, proselytizers and partisans that I object to, not from whom or whence CTs issue.

I get that. You are sick of the Bush/Cheney government starting their 9/11 conspiracy nonsense and Obama continuing it.
 
Conspiracies obviously happen, but as far as what we call “conspiracy theories” not really. I mean, I do tend to believe some shady things went on and evidence may have been tampered with in order to close the JFK case without any loose ends, but I still think Oswald did the deed on his own that day.

You are talking about the USA. They, governments and CIA, NSA, NED, ... are constantly creating conspiracies to subvert democracies around the world. History has shown that they will do anything evil to gain their nefarious ends.
 
I get that. You are sick of the Bush/Cheney government starting their 9/11 conspiracy nonsense and Obama continuing it.

You know, I'm getting tired of your responses to me. You keep trying to tell me what I think, what I'm sick of, etc.

I have stated what I think about conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorists.
  • I have not specified anything about anyone who you happen to construe as conspiracy theorists.
  • I have not identified anyone as a conspiracy theorist.
  • I have not identified any conspiracy theories.
I have made a general statement about what I think about conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorists, and I don't appreciate your trying to inject more specificity into my remarks than I have. If I were of a mind to refer expressly to any specific person or idea, I am both literate enough and capable of doing so, and had I wanted to, I would have done so.
 
Last edited:
I'm convinced JFK, MLK were assassinated as part of a plot, probably be rich, elite a holes that didn't like the civil rights movement. RFK as well. I think the fact they were supposed to release the JFK files recently and didn't tells me there is something sketchy going on
 
You know, I'm getting tired of your responses to me. You keep trying to tell me what I think, what I'm sick of, etc.

I have stated what I think about conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorists.
  • I have not specified anything about anyone who you happen to construe as conspiracy theorists.
  • I have not identified anyone as a conspiracy theorist.
  • I have not identified any conspiracy theories.
I have made a general statement about what I think about conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorists, and I don't appreciate your trying to inject more specificity into my remarks than I have. If I were of a mind to refer expressly to any specific person or idea, I am both literate enough and capable of doing so, and had I wanted to, I would have done so.

If you believe I have not analysed your comments accurately then please illustrate where I went wrong.
 
You know, I'm getting tired of your responses to me. You keep trying to tell me what I think, what I'm sick of, etc.

I have stated what I think about conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorists.
  • I have not specified anything about anyone who you happen to construe as conspiracy theorists.
  • I have not identified anyone as a conspiracy theorist.
  • I have not identified any conspiracy theories.
I have made a general statement about what I think about conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorists, and I don't appreciate your trying to inject more specificity into my remarks than I have. If I were of a mind to refer expressly to any specific person or idea, I am both literate enough and capable of doing so, and had I wanted to, I would have done so.

If you believe I have not analysed your comments accurately then please illustrate where I went wrong.

I know you told me what I am sick of and what I *must* be sick of....
-- Post 21: "You are sick of the Bush/Cheney government starting their 9/11 conspiracy nonsense and Obama continuing it."
-- Post 14: "You must be completely sick of the unrelenting conspiracy theory drivel that the US/UK/Canada/... has been spewing out since 9/11."
...and I don't appreciate your doing so.

If I feel so inclined, I will tell you what I am sick of. You, and everyone else, do not get to declare what galls me. The right and privilege of doing that is mine, and mine alone.

As I earlier stated, I'm tired of your responses to me. I am because each of them overtly or tacitly has put words in my mouth, and I don't care to keep responding to you just to address your having done so.

I guess my above quoted post wasn't clear enough for you. I shall now be as clear as I can be:
  • I've said all I care to say about conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorists.
  • I do not care to discuss the matter any further, so please do not reply to me about conspiracy theories and/or conspiracy theorists.
  • Please refrain from telling me what inferences your analysis of my remarks has led you to think I do or do not believe.
  • Please refrain from declaring anything about what I think, feel, must be, am sick of, etc. that I haven't already expressly declared.
  • Do not ask me questions about what I think because you've overworn your welcome with me; thus I'm not going to answer your questions regarding anything having to do with conspiracy theories and/or conspiracy theorists.
 
Back
Top Bottom