• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The jig is up on the US governments' 9/11 conspiracy theory

But you can't provide any. That isn't at all odd because there is no evidence. The folks in that dismal "study" you referenced will also likely see jail time or worse for their part in a totally transparent cover up.

I did provide it. Now, what about that evidence that you don't seem to have? If you don't want to discuss then just say so. All of your posts can be translated as "I have no evidence".
 
The Bush one, the Obama one and the Trump one. Although Trump believes the the twin towers at least were blown up.

Have you got any evidence?

If you won't tell us what your problems are with the official story then we cannot proceed. Let's start with something simple. What evidence do you have of the towers being blown up? And if they were then why fly planes into them?
 
Another article of faith among conspiracy theorists ...

Still no evidence. And you know full well why you can't supply any evidence.
 
Still no evidence. And you know full well why you can't supply any evidence.

The evidence is there. The official report fits the facts, in my opinion. Why won't you share your evidence with us?
 
It was the same invisible evidence that supporters of the US governments' story always provide.

You are boring. What is your 911 story? Are you a mini nuke or thermite man? Which truther story do you support?
 
ralphcdp's jig is up. Just another truther devoid of evidence.
 
The evidence is there. The official report fits the facts, in my opinion. ...

Of what use is your opinion. Science is not based on opinion. If the official report has so many facts why are they so difficult for you [the generic you] to locate. Where is the proof, real evidence, that there were any hijackers?
 
The Bush one, the Obama one and the Trump one. Although Trump believes the the twin towers at least were blown up.

Have you got any evidence?

Those are not different governments... you make ignorant statements and have no idea about basic grammar and you turn around and question me? This is a decent Troll Game but not a good one.
 
Why do I need to explain to you that that is not evidence? Have you got any of that "tons" of evidence?

Why do you not know that I already know that that is not evidence? Present your case that 9/11 was a conspiracy... go.
 
But you can't provide any. That isn't at all odd because there is no evidence. The folks in that dismal "study" you referenced will also likely see jail time or worse for their part in a totally transparent cover up.

So in other words you have no evidence, science or facts.....just delusional raving. Noted.
 
Present your case that 9/11 was a conspiracy... go.

It's simple. There is no evidence for the US governments' 9/11 conspiracy story. None of you apparently sold on the US government nonsense story has provided any.
 
So in other words you have no evidence, science or facts.....just delusional raving. Noted.

No evidence there. Not a person who believes in the US government figment has managed to provide any evidence. This is going to be a slam dunk.
 
It's simple. There is no evidence for the US governments' 9/11 conspiracy story. None of you apparently sold on the US government nonsense story has provided any.

It is simple. Let's take a look at your OP and see if you can back up your statements.

1. "The day of reckoning is fast approaching. There is no escaping from facts, evidence, science."
What facts, evidence and science are you referring too? Provide links / sources to the facts, evidence and scientific papers.

2. " The list of criminals is long indeed but how many will really do any time, how many will see life sentences, how many will get the death penalty?
You seem to indicate who the criminals are. Please provide a list of at least 10. You said the list is long.

3. "Will the American people/other countries that saw their citizens murdered demand death sentences for the perpetrators that blew up WTCs 1, 2 and 7? "
Who are the perpetrators you speak of. Provide links to the proof that who you name are in fact the ones who blew up WTC 1,2 and 7

4. "Will these same people/countries demand death sentences for those who have nearly doubled the number of deaths since 9/11 with the toxic remnants of the blown up towers? "

Who knows, it all depends if you can show the perps are guilty. Then I expect the public and world would demand justice.

Depending how you respond, I may have more questions for you. Let's see what you got. Your OP opened the door that the topic is the towers were "blown up"
 
Ralphcdp:

Are you going to respond to post 44. You must of read it.
 
You really have to learn what evidence means, pinqy. Newspaper articles are not evidence.

The article is about evidence that you claim does not exist.
Can you show that Anna's did not have such papers?
 
Your questions were answered. Nobody will be hung. We know that 19 terrorists hijacked planes and crashed them into buildings.

And died. The perps executed themselves.
 
The article is about evidence that you claim does not exist.
Can you show that Anna's did not have such papers?

Who is "Anna's"?

But again, newspaper articles are not considered to be evidence for court cases.
 
Back
Top Bottom