• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Evidence Sandy Hook was a hoax.

No, for some folks, standards for evidence and much more is what the authorities tell them. Like Scott Pelley at San Bernardino, whatever the authorities tell him matters much more than what any eye witness might tell him. Evidence for most americans is whatever the authorities tell them. That is pretty much what Casey of the CIA was referring to with his statement back in the 80's that when everything the American people believe is false, we will know the success of our misinformation efforts.

The lies told by authorities tend to be far more mundane and to the point than the delusional blather you absorbed from infowars. And contrary to your misunderstanding, people engaged in logical reasoning reason from the available evidence. They do not, like you, base elaborate narratives about government agents murdering children and convincing someone to confess on the absence of evidence.

What was the laughably (or is it scarily) stupid crap you spat out in one of the prior threads on this? That in your personal opinion, not based on training/experience and probably not even actually held, that a video should have been publicly released but it wasn't released, therefore /queue eerie music?




Eh...don't bother. I've never heard a truther say anything remotely resembling a logical thought process, but whatever is said is always said with an overwhelming dose of smug self-importance.
 
Are they on this thread? Also, why do you keep calling me that? I never claimed to be a master debater for you to try to taut me by calling me that. I try to argue with logic and reasoning as much as possible. I admit that I have biases and pitfalls, however I try my best to fix that.

If you want to know what he "thinks," first go to infowars, then watch the first ten videos on youtube that appear after a search like "Sandy hook false flag".......

The conspiracy theory community is easily the most self-referential lot around.
 
The people of Boston, including prosecutors and judges and ordinary folks, did a pretty darn good job of keep secret the shenanigans of many priests over many years.

Just the facts, ma'am, to borrow from Joe Friday.

The facts don't support the official narrative, they contradict it.
Can you provide an example of the facts contradicting the "official narrative"?
 
Some are, some are not. Usually those with a stake in the secret, financial or otherwise, are quite good at it. I suspect we both know that.

We have Navy SEALs writing and publishing books about how they Bin Laden before they were cleared to do so and yet you expect a soccer mom who's child friend was killed in the shooting to keep quiet about it?
 
We have Navy SEALs writing and publishing books about how they Bin Laden before they were cleared to do so and yet you expect a soccer mom who's child friend was killed in the shooting to keep quiet about it?

The lack of evidence of a conspiracy shows just how well the conspirators got rid of the evidence! Look, if they're able to mobilize tens of thousands of people to manufacture a terrorist attack on the twin towers, they can easily pull off murdering a bunch of children in a school and blaming it on an ex-student because.....errr....because reasons?
 
Back
Top Bottom