• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

WOMEN SCREAMING AT FLAKE IN ELEVATOR Were Soros-Funded Astroturfed Activist Leaders! — NOT VICTIMS

Ok...the store might have been there. Her meeting with Judge remains UNCORROBORATED.

Might have been there?

If you get your "news" from Gateway Pundit home of Jim Hoft "The Stupidest Man on the internet" then you really aren't trying too hard to find accuracy.
 
:lamo...yet another refutation of the OP in this thread. At this point, I don't believe there is a single word left that has not been thoroughly discredited. LOL.

The next time that guy (grokmaster) posts an accurate, truthful commentary....will definitely be his first.

Every time he posts something, it gets shredded by fact-checkers on the board. Every. Single. Time.

It's funny to see.

Already posted the FACTS from their OWN WEBSITE. POST #22.


But you already knew that, didn't you?

Disengenuous much?
 
Might have been there?

If you get your "news" from Gateway Pundit home of Jim Hoft "The Stupidest Man on the internet" then you really aren't trying too hard to find accuracy.

Once again . POST #22.


THE WEBSITE of the GROUP THEY ARE IN...listing Archila as the CO-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR.


NO REPORT EVER of her "sexual abuse" UNTIL AFTER THE FLAKE INCIDENT.


Total, OBVIOUS BULL****.
 
Once again . POST #22.


THE WEBSITE of the GROUP THEY ARE IN...listing Archila as the CO-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR.


NO REPORT EVER of her "sexual abuse" UNTIL AFTER THE FLAKE INCIDENT.


Total, OBVIOUS BULL****.

As usual, all scream and no substance.
 
Ok...the store might have been there.

And yet you declare she is a liar. And as an example of her 'lies' you present false evidence. That is shameful. You are part of the crowd that screams "Fake News!!" over anything that makes Trump/conservatives look bad. Your side falls for more fake news than any liberals.

Her meeting with Judge remains UNCORROBORATED.

Not shocking at all when you consider the fact Ford almost didn't come forward at all, herself. After the hell she has been through how many people would be willing to sacrifice their peaceful family lives?
 
Last edited:
Might have been there?

If you get your "news" from Gateway Pundit home of Jim Hoft "The Stupidest Man on the internet" then you really aren't trying too hard to find accuracy.

Nope, his kind care nothing for facts. They care only for what confirms their own biases. If the articles screams, "Conservatives good!! Liberals bad!!" then there is no further scrutiny.

And before Grok or others complain, yes liberals do it too, but it is nowhere to the extent of today's conservatives, particularly those who subscribe to the Trumpcult.
 
What's up with the right wing hate for Flake? He votes nearly 100% GOP he rated highly by all the righting groups? I don't get it.

It is because he doesn't subscribe to the Trumpcult. He could vote conservative on all the bills and tout all the party principles, but he speaks ill of the Dear Leader therefore he's a dirty liberal.
 
Already posted the FACTS from their OWN WEBSITE. POST #22.


But you already knew that, didn't you?

Disengenuous much?

YOUR words from post #22
Both are listed at the EXACT SOROS GROUP the article(s) claim...Archilla as the Co-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR.


Soros' funding of this group IS NOT EVEN IN QUESTION...aka: the OP IS 100% CORRECT.

I wonder why you would refer to post #22, when your favourite boogieman - George Soros is not a funder of this group. But, I will say it all depends upon how one understands your words. "Soros' funding of this group IS NOT EVEN IN QUESTION" because you are correct if people understand that there is no question - Soros doesn't fund this group.
 
Already posted the FACTS from their OWN WEBSITE. POST #22.
But you already knew that, didn't you?
Disengenuous much?

Come on, now. You're not really that stupid, are you?

You KNOW you haven't proven that Soros is behind that political action group. And, obviously, you KNOW that I know you haven't proven it. So why do you cling to idiotic arguments after you KNOW they have been discredited?

Only two possibilities: (1) ignorance, or (2) ideology.

Utter NONSENSE.


"Ana Maria Archila had never told her father that she was sexually abused as a child.

But after she confronted a U.S. senator about President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee and the video started going viral, she thought it was time to share her story."




IOW, MORE COMPLETELY USUBSTANTIATED, POLITICALLY MOTIVATED NONSENSE...this time from the SOROS-FUNDED , POLITICAL OPERATIVE, who "never told anyone about her 'sexual assault" until she was in the elevator with Flake".

:lamo
IOW, you're an emotional right winger who can't separate his feelings from facts. The FACT here is that you obviously LIED AGAIN when you declared that the women in question were not truly survivors of sexual assaults, as they claimed. You LIED....AGAIN.

People who lie, repeated, are labeled "liars". I hope you understand that, and don't whine about it later.
 
YOUR words from post #22


I wonder why you would refer to post #22, when your favourite boogieman - George Soros is not a funder of this group. But, I will say it all depends upon how one understands your words. "Soros' funding of this group IS NOT EVEN IN QUESTION" because you are correct if people understand that there is no question - Soros doesn't fund this group.
Not clever enough to CHECK THE LINK PROVIDED, we see....der....
 
Come on, now. You're not really that stupid, are you?

You KNOW you haven't proven that Soros is behind that political action group. And, obviously, you KNOW that I know you haven't proven it. So why do you cling to idiotic arguments after you KNOW they have been discredited?

Only two possibilities: (1) ignorance, or (2) ideology.



:lamo
IOW, you're an emotional right winger who can't separate his feelings from facts. The FACT here is that you obviously LIED AGAIN when you declared that the women in question were not truly survivors of sexual assaults, as they claimed. You LIED....AGAIN.

People who lie, repeated, are labeled "liars". I hope you understand that, and don't whine about it later.

They ARE PAID political operatives, and their "sudden need to reveal their DECADES OLD" assaults is as dubious as the rest of the current pack of left lies.
 
They ARE PAID political operatives, and their "sudden need to reveal their DECADES OLD" assaults is as dubious as the rest of the current pack of left lies.

You said Soros was behind them.

Prove it.
 
I don't give a good GODDAM if George Soros funded the outfit!
The RW has a hundred times more extremist deep pockets funding everything they say and do.
So you can run around with your hair on fire screaming

SOROS!!! SOROS!!! SOROS!!! SOROS!!! SOROS!!! SOROS!!! SOROS!!! SOROS!!! SOROS!!! SOROS!!!

1-1200x960a.jpg

all you want, it's absolutely hypocritical the moment anyone looks up all the big money funding the Right.
 
Back
Top Bottom