• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Lesbians are behind the Kavanaugh smear

Lutherf

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
49,614
Reaction score
55,243
Location
Tucson, AZ
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
You heard it here first!

Lesbians have conspired to promote the allegations of sexual misconduct against Kavanaugh in an effort to scare heterosexual men away from women thus leaving more women for them to court.




I'm out of other theories for how this has been so blown up so the one above is what I'm left with.
 
Or some men, possibly even supreme court nominees, have sexually harassed or assaulted women and women are getting sick and tired of men thinking that they can do as they please with womens bodies.
 
Or some men, possibly even supreme court nominees, have sexually harassed or assaulted women and women are getting sick and tired of men thinking that they can do as they please with womens bodies.

Just last week I stacked women's bodies as sand bags right near one of the streams here to prevent any flooding.
 
Or some men, possibly even supreme court nominees, have sexually harassed or assaulted women and women are getting sick and tired of men thinking that they can do as they please with womens bodies.

No doubt that some women have been sexually harassed. No doubt that some have been sexually assaulted and worse.

However, to cast such aspersions against a guy that has already gone through half a dozen background checks; to cast those aspersions with not just no evidence but ample testimony from witnesses the accuser identified which CONTRADICTS the claims; to cast those aspersions 35 years after the alleged incident and only when the accused is in the public spotlight can only have one purpose. That purpose is to scare men off women and to scare women into the arms of lesbians.
 
Or some men, possibly even supreme court nominees, have sexually harassed or assaulted women
And they erased the memories of everyone who may have witnessed it! Good one!
 
You heard it here first!

Lesbians have conspired to promote the allegations of sexual misconduct against Kavanaugh in an effort to scare heterosexual men away from women thus leaving more women for them to court.




I'm out of other theories for how this has been so blown up so the one above is what I'm left with.

You're willing to make up a ridiculous story but totally reject the story of the woman saying she was sexually assaulted by Kavanaugh. It's really just about your partisanship, not a search for truth.
 
No doubt that some women have been sexually harassed. No doubt that some have been sexually assaulted and worse.

However, to cast such aspersions against a guy that has already gone through half a dozen background checks; to cast those aspersions with not just no evidence but ample testimony from witnesses the accuser identified which CONTRADICTS the claims; to cast those aspersions 35 years after the alleged incident and only when the accused is in the public spotlight can only have one purpose. That purpose is to scare men off women and to scare women into the arms of lesbians.

Even supreme court nominees can be scum. I'm not saying that he did or didn't do anything only that there should be an investigation into the allegations.

If men aren't out there sexually harassing or assaulting women then they should not be worried. Women don't just turn lesbian because some men are scum.
 
You're willing to make up a ridiculous story but totally reject the story of the woman saying she was sexually assaulted by Kavanaugh. It's really just about your partisanship, not a search for truth.

They don't want the truth. They might have to admit they were wrong.
 
You heard it here first!

Lesbians have conspired to promote the allegations of sexual misconduct against Kavanaugh in an effort to scare heterosexual men away from women thus leaving more women for them to court.




I'm out of other theories for how this has been so blown up so the one above is what I'm left with.

Or maybe, juuuuuuuust maybe, Kavanaugh's was a terrible candidate before Ford and the others. He's lied to Congress multiple times, his personal finances are highly suspect, and he's a political operative.
 
No doubt that some women have been sexually harassed. No doubt that some have been sexually assaulted and worse.

However, to cast such aspersions against a guy that has already gone through half a dozen background checks; to cast those aspersions with not just no evidence but ample testimony from witnesses the accuser identified which CONTRADICTS the claims; to cast those aspersions 35 years after the alleged incident and only when the accused is in the public spotlight can only have one purpose. That purpose is to scare men off women and to scare women into the arms of lesbians.

For the record, I'm a lesbian. I only play a man on TV.
 
You heard it here first!

Lesbians have conspired to promote the allegations of sexual misconduct against Kavanaugh in an effort to scare heterosexual men away from women thus leaving more women for them to court.




I'm out of other theories for how this has been so blown up so the one above is what I'm left with.

****, we've been made! Dammit! *flees*
 
Are the lesbians working with the Space Vamps or the Lizard Men? Err I mean Lizard People?
 
Are the lesbians working with the Space Vamps or the Lizard Men? Err I mean Lizard People?

Both make up a portion of our clientele. And yes, Lizard people. You don't want to offended them with incorrect descriptors.
 
Both make up a portion of our clientele. And yes, Lizard people. You don't want to offended them with incorrect descriptors.

Clientele?
What service do you offer *nudge nudge wink wink*
 
No doubt that some women have been sexually harassed. No doubt that some have been sexually assaulted and worse.

However, to cast such aspersions against a guy that has already gone through half a dozen background checks; to cast those aspersions with not just no evidence but ample testimony from witnesses the accuser identified which CONTRADICTS the claims; to cast those aspersions 35 years after the alleged incident and only when the accused is in the public spotlight can only have one purpose. That purpose is to scare men off women and to scare women into the arms of lesbians.

A previously unreported assault by definition will not show up on a background check. What is the "background check" angle supposed to accomplish if anything other than obfuscation?



And why is it so confusing that someone might spend a lifetime trying to forget a traumatic assault, but feel obligated to finally say something when the person who perpetrated it might ascend to the highest court in the land, a court on which they might have a chance to show whether or not they care about starer decisis as it relates to decisions like Roe?
 
Or some men, possibly even supreme court nominees, have sexually harassed or assaulted women and women are getting sick and tired of men thinking that they can do as they please with womens bodies.

I know some women who will let you do anything you please with their bodies for $40 to $200.
Price depending upon the level of addiction present.
I say this because not all men are rapists, and not all women are pure as the driven snow.

Thinking otherwise is unrealistic.

Both women in the SCOTUS case admitted they were ****faced.
This means sometimes alcohol causes a change in personality.
The women may have became drunken sluts and Brett may have become an aggressive horndog.
TWO = TANGO
 
You're willing to make up a ridiculous story but totally reject the story of the woman saying she was sexually assaulted by Kavanaugh. It's really just about your partisanship, not a search for truth.

I do reject Ford's story, and that of Ramirez. I did not reject those stories out of hand, however. I looked at the story each accuser told and evaluated that story based on the evidence presented. In neither case did the accuser even come up with a reliable witness to the incident. In fact, in both cases the closest witnesses DENIED the accusation or denied knowledge of the alleged incident.
 
No doubt that some women have been sexually harassed. No doubt that some have been sexually assaulted and worse.

However, to cast such aspersions against a guy that has already gone through half a dozen background checks; to cast those aspersions with not just no evidence but ample testimony from witnesses the accuser identified which CONTRADICTS the claims; to cast those aspersions 35 years after the alleged incident and only when the accused is in the public spotlight can only have one purpose. That purpose is to scare men off women and to scare women into the arms of lesbians.

Bill Cosby, America's dad

Drugged to sexually assault woman, and did so for decades, is to be sentenced today. He was in the public eye for decades. Everyone thought he was nigh on a perfect role model. Until people took his accusers as being serious
 
This is almost as good as the, "Michelle Obama is a man" conspiracy...which I happen to think has some merit.
 
Bill Cosby, America's dad

Drugged to sexually assault woman, and did so for decades, is to be sentenced today. He was in the public eye for decades. Everyone thought he was nigh on a perfect role model. Until people took his accusers as being serious

There's a difference between being in the public eye and having half a dozen FBI background checks done on you. That's especially the case when the check is being done for a position where you will likely be presented with high level national security information.
 
Even supreme court nominees can be scum. I'm not saying that he did or didn't do anything only that there should be an investigation into the allegations.

If men aren't out there sexually harassing or assaulting women then they should not be worried. Women don't just turn lesbian because some men are scum.

They ARE investigating. How else has the current list of names been brought up? Kinda hard to investigate something that might have happened in a room in an unknown house, at an unknown time, on an unknown day roughly 35 years ago...which no one witnessed.
 
Back
Top Bottom