• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why is our 'modern physics'/technology so retarded and got it all backwards?

B

Belieth

Banned
Joined
Jul 19, 2018
Messages
225
Reaction score
6
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
E.g. take motors, they EXplode!

But that is not the best thing, the best thing is IMplosion.Where is that used?

And a lot of 'modern physics' is counter intuitive. Doesn't that say something?

Of course it does:

“The majority believes that everything hard to comprehend must be very profound. This is incorrect. What is hard to understand is what is immature, unclear and often false. The highest wisdom is simple and passes through the brain directly into the heart.”


― Viktor Schauberger
Click to expand...


Modern physics as teached and preached is an abonimation,a monster. and..it's obsolete!

“Comprehend and copy nature”
― Viktor Schauberger
Click to expand...


Forget the idiot Einstein etc.

Tesla, Schauberger, Walter Russel and others are way better at explaing nature, then contemporary physics does.


So, please stop learning that modern physics nonsense to our children.
 
I fail to see your premise. You don't understand physics so your argument is that nobody should study it?

All the easy discoveries have already been made... Newtons laws are complete child's play compared to the avenues of physics we are currently pursuing. The math is beyond human capabilities in some cases due to the data density, meaning that we have become wholly reliant on computers.

Just because some people make mistakes does not mean that we are not continuing to progress and increase our knowledge in these fields.
 
Last edited:
HenryLewis said:
I fail to see your premise. You don't understand physics so your argument is that nobody should study it?
Click to expand...

what makes you think I don't understand physics? I am not against 'physics' per se. I am against the physics that is teached in schools and universities. It's totally wrong.
 
How could you possibly be knowledgable of the topic if you did not learn about it in a school or university?

I doubt you have the intellect to understand these topics on your own... Only a few people to ever live have.
 
I’ll pretend for the moment that this is a serious post, which I know it isn’t.

The parts of physics that are “counter-intuitive”, such as quantum mechanics and relativity, are counter-intuitive because they weren’t necessary to our evolutionary survival, unlike, say, being able to deduce the trajectory of a moving object in an instant.

But those counter-intuitive scientific theories are also supported by more empirical evidence than nearly any other scientific theories ever devised.
 
HenryLewis said:
How could you possibly be knowledgable of the topic if you did not learn about it in a school or university?

I doubt you have the intellect to understand these topics on your own... Only a few people to ever live have.
Click to expand...

This is a cheap Ad Hominem, But doesn't matter. I have studied physics at univerity level. Alas, alas, alas.

Now please, adress the points I made with a valid argument of sorts.
 
Skeptic Bob said:
I’ll pretend for the moment that this is a serious post, which I know it isn’t.

The parts of physics that are “counter-intuitive”, such as quantum mechanics and relativity, are counter-intuitive because they weren’t necessary to our evolutionary survival, unlike, say, being able to deduce the trajectory of a moving object in an instant.

But those counter-intuitive scientific theories are also supported by more empirical evidence than nearly any other scientific theories ever devised.
Click to expand...

Really? Or is that your belief?

And take a note of this: I also once belived in the gobbledygook of relativity and quantum physics.


And yes, it is a very serious post, adressing a very serious issue.
 
You denounced a university education in physics then used your personal university education in physics as qualifying you to make this statement. That is hypocrisy of the highest degree.
 
Last edited:
And it is not an Ad Hominem attack to state the fact that you must be an outlier intellectually speaking to derive this knowledge on your own. Thousands of years of human history have proven this point. Newton is largely considered one of the greatest scientists to ever live due to his broaching of the field of physics.
 
Belieth said:
E.g. take motors, they EXplode!

But that is not the best thing, the best thing is IMplosion.Where is that used?

And a lot of 'modern physics' is counter intuitive. Doesn't that say something?

Of course it does:




Modern physics as teached and preached is an abonimation,a monster. and..it's obsolete!




Forget the idiot Einstein etc.

Tesla, Schauberger, Walter Russel and others are way better at explaing nature, then contemporary physics does.


So, please stop learning that modern physics nonsense to our children.
Click to expand...

I agree with your intuition. Physics has gotten something wrong.

But the other 90% is ridiculous.

Sure, motors take advantage of expansion, what you called explosion. My understanding is that when you have explosions in a motor, that's called pinging. Or having pieces of the engine blowing through the engine block.

Having an engine work on implosion is a clever idea. Let me know when you have a working prototype.

Intuition works in a certain way, but human perception and cognition is far from perfect in any circumstance. If you are reduced to relying on intuition, things are considerably less than our best. Saying a lot of things are counter-intuitive just means our understanding moved past the limits of our biology.

My personal opinion is that Einstein made the single greatest intellectual leap in human history.

If you are using a computer with a hard drive, that drive prob takes advantage of quantum principles.

The Modern world can feel alien. We all feel that. But if you look at the data, we live longer than our forbears. Infant mortality has been cut in half since I was a child. Back then, it was less than half what it had been a century earlier.

I'd call that a win.
 
HenryLewis said:
You denounced a university education in physics then used your personal university education in physics as qualifying you to make this statement. That is hypocrisy of the highest degree.
Click to expand...

didn't you read the word, ALAS?

My o my,can't the spoiled children here not take some critics at their religion? ;)
 
late said:
I agree with your intuition. Physics has gotten something wrong.

But the other 90% is ridiculous.

Sure, motors take advantage of expansion, what you called explosion. My understanding is that when you have explosions in a motor, that's called pinging. Or having pieces of the engine blowing through the engine block.

Having an engine work on implosion is a clever idea. Let me know when you have a working prototype.

Intuition works in a certain way, but human perception and cognition is far from perfect in any circumstance. If you are reduced to relying on intuition, things are considerably less than our best. Saying a lot of things are counter-intuitive just means our understanding moved past the limits of our biology.

My personal opinion is that Einstein made the single greatest intellectual leap in human history.

If you are using a computer with a hard drive, that drive prob takes advantage of quantum principles.

The Modern world can feel alien. We all feel that. But if you look at the data, we live longer than our forbears. Infant mortality has been cut in half since I was a child. Back then, it was less than half what it had been a century earlier.

I'd call that a win.
Click to expand...


a win? really? You have no clue at all!

And start reading the works of Tesla and Schauberger and you will understand implosions better.

I feel you are a bit biased. right?!


'modern physics' is an oxymoron.


And especially for you:

 
Last edited:
Spoiled children? How do you get off accusing me of an Ad Hominem attack? Your intellectual dishonesty is overwhelming.
 
Belieth said:
a win? really? You have no clue at all!

And start reading the works of Tesla and Schauberger and you will understand implosions better.

I feel you are a bit biased. right?!


'modern physics' is an oxymoron.
Click to expand...

A win in a thousand ways. I see you decided to skip over how you are using quantum physics...

You misunderstand, we've been refining gas engines for over a century. You need to come up with something better...

Allow me to apologise, you wanted to rant, and didn't want reality to get in the way.
 
late said:
A win in a thousand ways. I see you decided to skip over how you are using quantum physics...

You misunderstand, we've been refining gas engines for over a century. You need to come up with something better...

Allow me to apologise, you wanted to rant, and didn't want reality to get in the way.
Click to expand...

I am not using quantum physicis nonsense at all. and no, it has nothing to do with my computer
(can't these people be more creative? they tell all the same nonsense!)
 
Ignore the trolling attention seeker.
 
zyzygy said:
It means that a certain person should have paid more attention in school.
Click to expand...

I would say that a certain person didn't pay any attention in school
 
To be fair sometimes motors do explode
explode.jpg
 
Belieth said:
what makes you think I don't understand physics? I am not against 'physics' per se. I am against the physics that is teached in schools and universities. It's totally wrong.
Click to expand...

Provide specific examples of wrong teaching.

Please explain Newton's laws of motion. Are you saying Newton got it wrong? If so why and explain what is correct.
 
mike2810 said:
Provide specific examples of wrong teaching.

Please explain Newton's laws of motion. Are you saying Newton got it wrong? If so why and explain what is correct.
Click to expand...

well the best way is to show you the way to the works of Victro Schauberger. Yes Newton had a lot wrong. Just like einstein had it wrong, heisenberger had it all wrong. I mean the whole of physics is dead wrong. There are no black holes, it is sheer impossible. relativity theory has it all very wrong. quantum physics is actually quantum quackery, There never was a black hole. and so forth..
 
late said:
I agree with your intuition. Physics has gotten something wrong.

But the other 90% is ridiculous.

Sure, motors take advantage of expansion, what you called explosion. My understanding is that when you have explosions in a motor, that's called pinging. Or having pieces of the engine blowing through the engine block.

Having an engine work on implosion is a clever idea. Let me know when you have a working prototype.

Intuition works in a certain way, but human perception and cognition is far from perfect in any circumstance. If you are reduced to relying on intuition, things are considerably less than our best. Saying a lot of things are counter-intuitive just means our understanding moved past the limits of our biology.

My personal opinion is that Einstein made the single greatest intellectual leap in human history.

If you are using a computer with a hard drive, that drive prob takes advantage of quantum principles.

The Modern world can feel alien. We all feel that. But if you look at the data, we live longer than our forbears. Infant mortality has been cut in half since I was a child. Back then, it was less than half what it had been a century earlier.

I'd call that a win.
Click to expand...

What has it gotten wrong?
 
Belieth said:
Modern physics as teached and preached is an abonimation,a monster. and..it's obsolete!

Forget the idiot Einstein etc.

Tesla, Schauberger, Walter Russel and others are way better at explaing nature, then contemporary physics does.

So, please stop learning that modern physics nonsense to our children.
Click to expand...

LOL

Half a century after the Moon landing and our scientists do not talk about the Planned Obsolescence of cars.

But wait, we are supposed to worry about the economy pumping CO2 into the atmosphere. :lamo
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom