• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Does Bigfoot exist or not?

Moast will probably say no, but I am not so sure anymore....

And what evidence did you come across to make you doubt your earlier disbelief ?


...maybe Bigfoot does exist, but we aren't told because it would be a little awkward toward our evolution theory, would it?

Ah well, everything real is a bit awkward for evolution theory...

Except the US government is made up of theists - specifically people who openly admit to believing in the Christian god the creator.

So explain to me again, what is their motivation in hiding something that might prove their creation belief is correct ?
 
If Bigfoot does exist why does that prove that a god did it?
 
If Bigfoot does exist why does that prove that a god did it?

It doesn't BUT if it did....what's the motivation of a theist loaded government for covering its existence (past of present) up ?
 
It doesn't BUT if it did....what's the motivation of a theist loaded government for covering its existence (past of present) up ?

And who decided that it needed to be covered up and when did this occur? Why did it occur?
 
And who decided that it needed to be covered up and when did this occur? Why did it occur?

Actually, the idea that "one" ever existed makes no sense. It would take a population of them--a pretty big population, in fact.

A species needs a minimum number of individuals to survive without going extinct. So, lets say some small pocket of a few dozen beings like Homo Erectus (perhaps the closest thing there is to an actual Bigfoot) managed to survive over the eons of time somewhere --Oh, I don't know?-- maybe deep in the Canadian Rockies, it would not be able to sustain itself for more than a generation or two, tops. And, that makes no sense because these things would have short life spans and need to constantly reproduce.

For such a species to even number in the dozens today, there would have had to have been tens of thousands of them 100 years ago. Which means we'd be finding remains of them all over the place. And, of course, no one has found a "bigfoot" bone that is less than 50,000 years old ever.
 
Actually, the idea that "one" ever existed makes no sense. It would take a population of them--a pretty big population, in fact.

A species needs a minimum number of individuals to survive without going extinct. So, lets say some small pocket of a few dozen beings like Homo Erectus (perhaps the closest thing there is to an actual Bigfoot) managed to survive over the eons of time somewhere --Oh, I don't know?-- maybe deep in the Canadian Rockies, it would not be able to sustain itself for more than a generation or two, tops. And, that makes no sense because these things would have short life spans and need to constantly reproduce.

For such a species to even number in the dozens today, there would have had to have been tens of thousands of them 100 years ago. Which means we'd be finding remains of them all over the place. And, of course, no one has found a "bigfoot" bone that is less than 50,000 years old ever.

When they die their bones are magically transported to another dimension.
 
That would explain it.

Yes,there is a extra dimensional mausoleum full of Bigfoot, leprechaun, goblin, pixie, sprite, mermaid, gryphon, centaur, bogey men, fairy bones and bones from creatures from other worlds.
 
Moast will probably say no, but I am not so sure anymore.

Because this world is build upon lies upon lies upon lies..


Maybe Bigfoot does exist, but we aren't told because it would be a little awkward toward our evolution theory, would it?

Ah well, everything real is a bit awkward for evolution theory,

But I digress.:mrgreen:

There are actually two big feet that exist:

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/venezuelan-man-has-biggest-feet-world-n447106

A Venezuelan man has claimed a spot on the Guinness Book of World Records for the biggest feet. Jeison Orlando Rodríguez Hernandez, 20, from Maracay, Venezuela, has feet measuring nearly 16 inches each and his shoes are size 26.
 
Actually, the idea that "one" ever existed makes no sense. It would take a population of them--a pretty big population, in fact.

A species needs a minimum number of individuals to survive without going extinct...


Exactly, I read once that the minimum number to keep a species alive was 128. I'm not sure if that is correct but you do need more than a handful of survivors. And even then the population will start seeing genetic flaws. Like we can see with the North American buffalo today.

It's the reason why I don't believe the Loch Ness Monster doesn't exist, nor the Abominable Snowman.
 
Back
Top Bottom