• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

‘Zero evidence’ that Russia hacked DNC, says NSA whistleblower (VIDEO)

You've formed an opinion contrary to public, conclusive evidence based on what "a guy" publicly stated several times?

When everybody is thinking the same, nobody is thinking. That is not an original thought by me, but I can't remember who said it. No matter, it's true in so many ways. Crowds are not known for their analytical abilities, and when the crowds are thoroughly indoctrinated over generations, it can really be funny, sad.

Conclusive evidence? You're an easy mark. :lol:
 
Then why say it? That's not speculation. That is outrightly inventing or spreading a lie. Why waste your mental facilities with such trash? Put another way, even if President Obama is gay (he's not), why would that be a matter for you to discuss? Why does it matter to you?



Ah, you peddle conspiracy theories. Got it now.



Both political parties are utterly corrupt and damaging to American society. This thread, however, is based in delusion and a willful denial of reality. It's counterproductive.

We both peddle conspiracy theories. You peddle those advanced by the authorities and mainstream media, I peddle those that the authorities and mainstream media go to great lengths to keep away from your perception.

Men in power DO conspire, whether you understand that fact or not.
 
No, the entire intelligence world did not say that Saddam Hussein had WMD. That was the Bush administration. The entire intelligence world did say that Russia interfered in the 2016 election. There is a very big difference.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-iraq-wrong-or-hyped-by-the-bush-white-house/

Yes, I must stand corrected. Not the entire world, but the British and US "intelligence" agencies did. My bad. Thank God for the Downing Street Memo. :mrgreen:
 
We both peddle conspiracy theories. You peddle those advanced by the authorities and mainstream media, I peddle those that the authorities and mainstream media go to great lengths to keep away from your perception.

Men in power DO conspire, whether you understand that fact or not.

The MSM is what it is and so is RT/Sputnik. The MSM is a bit dubious, DD is required. The Russian outlets are pure garbage and not, imo, worth bothering with.

YMMV, and it's your time...
 
The MSM is what it is and so is RT/Sputnik. The MSM is a bit dubious, DD is required. The Russian outlets are pure garbage and not, imo, worth bothering with.

YMMV, and it's your time...

I read many sources from both sides. Mostly just the headlines, but if a story seems informative I'll read the whole thing.

As a US citizen and tax payer, I find the RT propaganda to be much less offensive in nature than the western MSM. There is a reason they forced RT to comply with FARA, but not AIPAC. Propaganda can be subtle or blunt.
 
That shows how clueless you are......try and think of a Nation in Asia...hehheh

China? You mean the country Putin's been fawning over for years now?

Heheheh.....you are in for a big shock buddy.
 
When everybody is thinking the same, nobody is thinking. That is not an original thought by me, but I can't remember who said it. No matter, it's true in so many ways. Crowds are not known for their analytical abilities, and when the crowds are thoroughly indoctrinated over generations, it can really be funny, sad.

Conclusive evidence? You're an easy mark. :lol:

So you have no rationale for believing "a guy" (those are your words) versus the entire rest of the world, including those who actually know what they're talking about. Hmm.
 
We both peddle conspiracy theories. You peddle those advanced by the authorities and mainstream media, I peddle those that the authorities and mainstream media go to great lengths to keep away from your perception.

Men in power DO conspire, whether you understand that fact or not.

Oh, please. I have never repeated a CT. That's your thing.
 
Oh, please. I have never repeated a CT. That's your thing.

You think that way because you have never contemplated the literal meaning of the term, nor the history of that term.

To broaden your horizons, you should consider buying and reading the book by Lance deHaven-Smith published in 2013, "Conspiracy Theory in America".
 
Checkerboard Strangler, you are a very intelligent man. Вы очень умныи человек.
 
Back
Top Bottom