• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:57: 1585]Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.

Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

mike2810 said:
Yet you post on a discussion forum.
Click to expand...

Go ahead, metabunkers, post your totally unsupportable lies. Your zero evidence will be as humorous as it always has been. Did you see how chief metabunker, ole mickey got totally destroyed? It was hilarious. And a dandy example of just how untrustworthy lying metabunkers are.
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

ralphcdp said:
Go ahead, metabunkers, post your totally unsupportable lies. Your zero evidence will be as humorous as it always has been. Did you see how chief metabunker, ole mickey got totally destroyed? It was hilarious. And a dandy example of just how untrustworthy lying metabunkers are.
Click to expand...

Why do you edit my posts? You are a prime example of what people like Gage, et.al. do. They take a partial fact and edit out that which does not support their positon. So you are batting 1000 in not answering questions.

So no evidence that 9/11 was an inside job. The most basic premise is each alternative stands on its own merits. You failed to present any. It is clear you know of the evidence regarding the plane crash, damage, and fires. You just can't accept known facts.
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

mike2810 said:
Why do you edit my posts? You just can't accept known facts.
Click to expand...

Hilarious. Do you have a metabunker club card signed by ole mickey?
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

ralphcdp said:
Hilarious. Do you have a metabunker club card signed by ole mickey?
Click to expand...

No, he gave the last one to you. Told me you are a charter member. That really made Gage mad. :mrgreen:

"So no evidence that 9/11 was an inside job. The most basic premise is each alternative stands on its own merits. You failed to present any. It is clear you know of the evidence regarding the plane crash, damage, and fires. You just can't accept known facts. "
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

mike2810 said:
No, he gave the last one to you. Told me you are a charter member. That really made Gage mad.

You just can't accept known facts. "
Click to expand...

Wow, the metabunkers are as terrible at humor as they are at evidence. metabunkers don't even know what facts means. All the evidence is inand it is going to be presented to the grand jury. metabunkers can, and will do what they always do, try to deny that fact, but this is of no consequence as everyone, including metabunkers, knows that metabunkers have never been honest participants. They lie, deny science and reality.

And support a government that has murdered almost 6,000 of their own. That really takes a special kind of evil. Care you show a screenshot of your metabunker member card?

Did you read how mickey's review was the only one that got a ONE? Some leader!!
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

Waste of time.
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

You can't debate or discuss 9/11 unless the two sides can agree on the basic facts / observations / and applicable science.

This person comes along and will not stipulate to some of the basic facts/observations such as hijackers took over 4 planes. As he sees this fake "news" / observation / report.... there is little to discuss. I would not even be interested to hear his fantasy about what he things happened.
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

SanderO said:
You can't debate or discuss 9/11 unless the two sides can agree on the basic facts / observations / and applicable science.
Click to expand...

No serious researchers/scientists waste their time with Mick and the metabunkers. Because they have no evidence. Lawyers know what evidence is and so will the grand jury when they hear it.

SanderO said:
This person comes along and will not stipulate to some of the basic facts/observations such as hijackers took over 4 planes.
Click to expand...

See what I mean about metabunkers and their lies. There are no time/date stamped photos of any alleged hijackers from 9/11 from any airport. There were so many US government lies right from day one. By noon of 911 that war criminal Bremer was on TV screaming "OBL, OBL, OBL".

And though both US and UK governments promised evidence none was ever provided.
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

ralphcdp said:
No serious researchers/scientists waste their time with Mick and the metabunkers. Because they have no evidence. Lawyers know what evidence is and so will the grand jury when they hear it.



See what I mean about metabunkers and their lies. There are no time/date stamped photos of any alleged hijackers from 9/11 from any airport. There were so many US government lies right from day one. By noon of 911 that war criminal Bremer was on TV screaming "OBL, OBL, OBL".

And though both US and UK governments promised evidence none was ever provided.
Click to expand...

You do realize no one is taking you seriously in what you post.
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

mike2810 said:
You do realize no one is taking you seriously in what you post.
Click to expand...

You do realize that what metabunkers think and do is of no concern to me. I'm not big on those who celebrate their governments murdering their own and millions of others.

Maybe you should check with old mickey before you go off meme.
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

ralphcdp said:
No serious researchers/scientists waste their time with Mick and the metabunkers. Because they have no evidence. Lawyers know what evidence is and so will the grand jury when they hear it.



See what I mean about metabunkers and their lies. There are no time/date stamped photos of any alleged hijackers from 9/11 from any airport. There were so many US government lies right from day one. By noon of 911 that war criminal Bremer was on TV screaming "OBL, OBL, OBL".

And though both US and UK governments promised evidence none was ever provided.
Click to expand...

hahahahahahaha


First. I am not a debunker or a metabunker whatever that is supposed to be. My interest in the collapse of the buildings at the WTC is simply to satisfy MY CURIOSITY and understanding of how the buildings came down. I am open to any and all intelligent explanations and details of explanations. I am not online to prove anything... to engage in debates, debunk anything... publish findings, give lectures, participate in public or online presentations. I do "research" online and offline to inform my understanding. I share my thoughts, and sometimes graphics I have created to assist in conveying my thinking. I am not assembling evidence and not interested in legal cases.

You write like a rude clown and are no taken seriously... and it's not even amusing... simply annoying.
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

SanderO said:
You can't debate or discuss 9/11 unless the two sides can agree on the basic facts / observations / and applicable science.

This person comes along and will not stipulate to some of the basic facts/observations such as hijackers took over 4 planes. As he sees this fake "news" / observation / report.... there is little to discuss. I would not even be interested to hear his fantasy about what he things happened.
Click to expand...

You don't know the difference, it appears, between basic facts and government talking points. Neither you nor the government can prove that any hijackings at all took place, yet you console yourself by describing the hijacking claim as being factual. So it goes in the world of the dissonant.

Nothing is as it appears, you note, but you don't even heed your own signature line. C'est la vie.
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

Thoreau72 said:
You don't know the difference, it appears, between basic facts and government talking points. Neither you nor the government can prove that any hijackings at all took place, yet you console yourself by describing the hijacking claim as being factual. So it goes in the world of the dissonant.

Nothing is as it appears, you note, but you don't even heed your own signature line. C'est la vie.
Click to expand...

Neither you or those you follow (Gage, Prager) can prove it was carried out by a part of the government. You spout talking points from AE911T, Veterans Today, DRG, etc. They can't even agree. You console yourself in believing what they say it true. It was the evil government. "So it goes in the world of the dissonant."

Like SanderO stated "You can't debate or discuss 9/11 unless the two sides can agree on the basic facts / observations / and applicable science."
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

Thoreau72 said:
You don't know the difference, it appears, between basic facts and government talking points. Neither you nor the government can prove that any hijackings at all took place, yet you console yourself by describing the hijacking claim as being factual. So it goes in the world of the dissonant.

Nothing is as it appears, you note, but you don't even heed your own signature line. C'est la vie.
Click to expand...

Actually it has bene doen you just pretend the evidence doesnt exist or is "faked"
Whereas all your "evidence" has been shown to be distortions or fanbrications.
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

mike2810 said:
Neither you or those you follow (Gage, Prager) can prove it was carried out by a part of the government. You spout talking points from AE911T, Veterans Today, DRG, etc. They can't even agree. You console yourself in believing what they say it true. It was the evil government. "So it goes in the world of the dissonant."

Like SanderO stated "You can't debate or discuss 9/11 unless the two sides can agree on the basic facts / observations / and applicable science."
Click to expand...

2 sides? Heck you can teven get the truthers to agree amongst themselves to the basic facts/observations/applicable science
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

Quag said:
2 sides? Heck you can teven get the truthers to agree amongst themselves to the basic facts/observations/applicable science
Click to expand...

What they cannot understand is that for most of us it does not matter what the "government" said. It is what the evidence/facts shows. I have know doubt that the "government" did not get all the minute details of 9/11 correct. One reason why the collapse description is stated as most likely or most probable. No one knows the exact damage done by the crash or fires. After all these years and still no one concise controlled demolition explanation, nor one concise explanation for the Pentagon or Shankville. Each of the groups still want their piece of the money pie. Got to keep the conspiracy alive. :mrgreen:
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

SanderO said:
My interest in the collapse of the buildings at the WTC is simply to satisfy MY CURIOSITY and understanding of how the buildings came down.
Click to expand...

That's easy, controlled demolitions. The science is unequivocal on that.
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

mike2810 said:
What they cannot understand is that for most of us it does not matter what the "government" said. It is what the evidence/facts shows.
Click to expand...

That's hilarious, "evidence/facts" is antithetical to metabunkers.


I have know doubt that the "government" did not get all the minute details of 9/11 correct.
Click to expand...

That is true. They ****ed up royally. No evidence for OBL, no Muslim hijackers, molten steel, molybdenum, iron, US nanothermite, seismic record shows bombs, ... .

But metabunkers make this loony pretense that they are interested in evidence/facts. That is nutty beyond belief.
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

7/11 was a part time job.
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

ralphcdp said:
ralphcdp: There is no date/time stamp on that video.


Maccabee: That's only a point of contention, not a dismantling argument. Whoever went over the footage, would've easily be able to time stamp the time of day during the trail.



Time/date stamping is done automatically by the camera giving time, date and camera location.
Click to expand...

Not every camera does it.

Had someone time/date stamped it by other means that would constitute tampering with evidence, a very serious crime. Which is something the US governments have done a lot of with respect to the science and evidence of 9/11.
Click to expand...

Evidence?
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

zyzygy said:
The evidence that does not exist.
Click to expand...

That of the US government and their slavering metabunkers who seem to thrill to embracing the slaughter of innocents. Do you like the metabunkers' jumper videos or the US "shake and bake" videos?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom