• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:57: 1585]Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.

Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

As always no evidence from a twoofer.

You won't get answers from him. Just the same old rants we have seen over the years.
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

You won't get answers from him. Just the same old rants we have seen over the years.

The usual predictable twoofer rants. What else can they do? They never had any evidence.
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

But 19 nonexistent Muslims were able to pull this off? Some people will believe absolutely anything.
What evidence do you have that they are nonexistent?
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

What evidence do you have that they are nonexistent?

Already asked but no answer. He has no evidence of his accusations. Nothing new to see here, just the usual twoofer nonsense.
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

Already asked but no answer. He has no evidence of his accusations. Nothing new to see here, just the usual twoofer nonsense.

I generally give a poster two to three times to answer questions asked of them. If they fail to respond, answer with a question, or state the question was silly/etc., I no longer will directly respond to their posts.

141 pages and no evidence of 9/11 was an inside job. Other than the fire was on the inside of the building. Does that count as an inside job?:mrgreen:
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

I generally give a poster two to three times to answer questions asked of them. If they fail to respond, answer with a question, or state the question was silly/etc., I no longer will directly respond to their posts.

141 pages and no evidence of 9/11 was an inside job. Other than the fire was on the inside of the building. Does that count as an inside job?:mrgreen:

The only reason for responding to a truther or CT fan is amusement and/or an interest in the psychology of conspiracy theorists.
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

I generally give a poster two to three times to answer questions asked of them. If they fail to respond, answer with a question, or state the question was silly/etc., I no longer will directly respond to their posts.

141 pages and no evidence of 9/11 was an inside job. Other than the fire was on the inside of the building. Does that count as an inside job?:mrgreen:
Who could imagine huge planes full of aviation fuel crashing into buildings and starting fires and damaging the buildings? Obviously an inside job.
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

Hijackers by Airplane:
American Airlines Flight 11
Mohamed Atta - Egypt, tactical leader of 9/11 plot and pilot
Abdul Aziz al Omari - Saudi Arabia
Wail al Shehri - Saudi Arabia
Waleed al Shehri - Saudi Arabia
Satam al Suqami - Saudi Arabia
United Airlines Flight 175
Fayez Banihammad - United Arab Emirates
Ahmed al Ghamdi - Saudi Arabia
Hamza al Ghamdi - Saudi Arabia
Marwan al Shehhi - United Arab Emirates, pilot
Mohand al Shehri - Saudi Arabia
American Airlines Flight 77
Hani Hanjour - Saudi Arabia, pilot
Nawaf al Hazmi - Saudi Arabia
Salem al Hazmi - Saudi Arabia
Khalid al Mihdhar - Saudi Arabia
Majed Moqed - Saudi Arabia
United Airlines Flight 93
Saeed al Ghamdi - Saudi Arabia
Ahmad al Haznawi - Saudi Arabia
Ziad Jarrah - Lebanon, pilot
Ahmed al Nami - Saudi Arabia
Hijackers by Nationality:
Egypt
Mohamed Atta
Lebanon
Ziad Jarrah
Saudi Arabia
Ahmed al Ghamdi
Hamza al Ghamdi
Saeed al Ghamdi
Hani Hanjour
Nawaf al Hazmi
Salem al Hazmi
Ahmad al Haznawi
Ahmed al Nami
Khalid al Mihdhar
Majed Moqed
Abdul Aziz al Omari
Mohand al Shehri
Wail al Shehri
Waleed al Shehri
Satam al Suqami
United Arab Emirates
Fayez Banihammad
Marwan al Shehhi
September 11 Hijackers Fast Facts - CNN
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

What evidence do you have that they are nonexistent?

What evidence do you have that they are existed on 9/11?
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

Hijackers by Airplane:
American Airlines Flight 11
Mohamed Atta - Egypt, tactical leader of 9/11 plot and pilot
Abdul Aziz al Omari - Saudi Arabia
Wail al Shehri - Saudi Arabia
Waleed al Shehri - Saudi Arabia
Satam al Suqami - Saudi Arabia
United Airlines Flight 175
Fayez Banihammad - United Arab Emirates
Ahmed al Ghamdi - Saudi Arabia
Hamza al Ghamdi - Saudi Arabia
Marwan al Shehhi - United Arab Emirates, pilot
Mohand al Shehri - Saudi Arabia
American Airlines Flight 77
Hani Hanjour - Saudi Arabia,
September 11 Hijackers Fast Facts - CNN

That is not evidence. That is a newspaper article. I'm not surprised that you don't understand the difference.
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

Who could imagine huge planes full of aviation fuel crashing into buildings and starting fires and damaging the buildings? Obviously an inside job.

WOW, you surely don't know anything about this event at all. The designers of the twin towers not only imagined it, they designed the buildings to ensure that such an event would not cause their demise. The explosives brought down the buildings.
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

WOW, you surely don't know anything about this event at all. The designers of the twin towers not only imagined it, they designed the buildings to ensure that such an event would not cause their demise. The explosives brought down the buildings.

Link to the evidence of that claim, please. How were the buildings prepped with nobody noticing? Have you ever seen a building that has been prepped for demolition? It would be hard to miss. Plus no explosive residues were found.
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

Link to the evidence of that claim, please.

I'm not at all surprised that you have no clue about the science and evidence of 9/11.

How were the buildings prepped with nobody noticing? Have you ever seen a building that has been prepped for demolition? It would be hard to miss. Plus no explosive residues were found.

Why do you take such great pains to illustrate your ignorance on these issues? Care to share your CV? It will illustrate why you have no standing to discuss these things.
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]



Obviously you have no evidence that Muslim hijackers existed on 9/11? Any photos? How about videos? Don't airports have CCTVs?
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

I'm not at all surprised that you have no clue about the science and evidence of 9/11.



Why do you take such great pains to illustrate your ignorance on these issues? Care to share your CV? It will illustrate why you have no standing to discuss these things.
So you have no alternative 911 theory. I already knew that. What qualifications do you have? None in the controlled demolition field, obviously. and you are the one claiming that were were no hijackers. Prove it and tell us who did fly the planes and commit suicide? Be brave and actaully answer a question.
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]


Here you are telling me that you can't find any photos for "hijackers" from any of the hundreds of CCTV cameras at the airports on 9/11. And still the metabunkers persist in their serious delusions.

Do you have any grasp of how patently dishonest it is to continue in such delusional behavior when there is no evidence for your position?
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

I really think hes here in a vain attempt to get people to give more money to one of the make money off of 911 schèmes out there. After all the gravy train hasnt been providing much in the last few years.
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

I'm not at all surprised that you have no clue about the science and evidence of 9/11.



Why do you take such great pains to illustrate your ignorance on these issues? Care to share your CV? It will illustrate why you have no standing to discuss these things.

Link to the evidence of your claim, please.
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

143 pages and no evidence that 9/11 was an "inside job."

What is evident is some who believe it was do not provide sources to back up what they state.
 
Re: Evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.[W:57]

143 pages and no evidence that 9/11 was an "inside job."

What is evident is some who believe it was do not provide sources to back up what they state.

This is an example of what is called a troll... posts to piss off others.... Simply ignore this poster.

A HUGE problem with "debate" about 9/11 for example is that the two "sides" of an issue need to agree of stipulate to what the facts are. Truthers have a problem the facts... to them the facts are like Trump's "fake news". Or they demand that a fact be proven as if it is debatable. Or they assert something as a fact which is not a fact such as free fall motion is a characteristic exclusive to CDs. Denial and lack of critical thinking... and most cases no technical education.
 
Back
Top Bottom