• We will be taking the forum down for maintenance at [3:30 PM CDT] - in 25 minutes. We should be down less than 1 hour.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Poll

Should there be a gray area of people in MIC with security clearances higher than the President?


  • Total voters
    4

sKiTzo

DP Veteran
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
2,671
Reaction score
535
Location
OC California
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Other
Rogue factions of the intelligence agencies and MIC are out of control with the constant school shootings as they try to advance the traitorous agenda of disarming the people. Make no mistake - they are the root of all the world's problems and it's not going to stop until that swamp is drained (don't ask me to provide "proof" of anything. I'm not here to prove anything. This discussion is for those who have done their research and have been able to discern enough to see through the fake media. I posted in CT section to save the mods the trouble).

Problem: How do you drain the swamp of the MIC who are so deeply embedded that there are people there with higher security clearances than the President?

Proposed solution: We shut down for the sole purpose of directing the focus of the entire nation on this one issue.. I mean nobody goes to work - nobody does anything until congress outlaws security clearances higher than the President and roots these people out.

Any other ideas?
 
So wait hold on, I think you're trying to say that school shootings are false flags in order to push an anti-gun agenda correct?
 
So wait hold on, I think you're trying to say that school shootings are false flags in order to push an anti-gun agenda correct?

I'm fairly certain your analysis is correct.
For some posters, blaming the MIC is a step up from the usual "The Joos did it".
 
Hmph.....no votes yet.
I suspect everyone is waiting for their MIC handlers to pay them for their "yes" votes.
 
Proposed solution: We shut down for the sole purpose of directing the focus of the entire nation on this one issue.. I mean nobody goes to work - nobody does anything until congress outlaws security clearances higher than the President and roots these people out.

Any other ideas?

What impact would your proposed solution have on the economy? How would "the people" be able to buy food, etc? Some specialist say many "people" have no savings.


possible solution: join the "them" and embrace the MIC.:mrgreen:
 
Very good. I'm impressed..

Well... I'm not, that's a sickening belief to have.

tenor.gif
 
I ignored the actual comments in the post and simply voted NO in response to the title question.

No one should have a higher security clearance than the serving President. Period.
 
"Should there be a gray area of people in MIC with security clearances higher than the President?"

Depends on which President. :lol:

Thx :)
 
I ignored the actual comments in the post and simply voted NO in response to the title question.

No one should have a higher security clearance than the serving President. Period.

...and I don't think there are any other countries who would allow a branch of government to operate in the shadows, steal black budget money, remain completely anonymous, have the resources of the military and intelligence community at their disposal, and answer to no one because they have higher security clearances than the President! No wonder we have this perpetual circus going on.
 
Rogue factions of the intelligence agencies and MIC are out of control with the constant school shootings as they try to advance the traitorous agenda of disarming the people. Make no mistake - they are the root of all the world's problems and it's not going to stop until that swamp is drained (don't ask me to provide "proof" of anything. I'm not here to prove anything. This discussion is for those who have done their research and have been able to discern enough to see through the fake media. I posted in CT section to save the mods the trouble).

Problem: How do you drain the swamp of the MIC who are so deeply embedded that there are people there with higher security clearances than the President?

Proposed solution: We shut down for the sole purpose of directing the focus of the entire nation on this one issue.. I mean nobody goes to work - nobody does anything until congress outlaws security clearances higher than the President and roots these people out.

Any other ideas?

:lamo

Love how you desperately try to dodge the whole “proving you are correct” problem by simply declaring you are correct, no evidence needed :roll:

Nobody is buying your fairy tales
 
...and I don't think there are any other countries who would allow a branch of government to operate in the shadows, steal black budget money, remain completely anonymous, have the resources of the military and intelligence community at their disposal, and answer to no one because they have higher security clearances than the President! No wonder we have this perpetual circus going on.

You obviously have no knowledge of the history of other countries.
 
:lamo

Love how you desperately try to dodge the whole “proving you are correct” problem by simply declaring you are correct, no evidence needed :roll:

Nobody is buying your fairy tales

Yeah, I wish I would have thought of that a long time ago. I really only want to post to discuss issues with people who are aware of the issues. It saves me from wasting my time posting "proof" for shills who really don't want the "proof". They (you) never acknowledge it no matter how good it is. I could post an HD video of Bush blowing Cheney to prove that Bush and Cheney are homos, and shills don't acknowledge it because they are shills. They're not genuine posters who are willing to follow strict debate rules. Rule number one is do not enter a debate if you don't plan to concede when proven wrong. Rule number two is when asked to post links proving yourself correct - If you don't post them yet you keep on yackin', you don't qualify and I no longer have time to keep engaging just for sport. Making an assclown out of you is amusing only for so long. For this reason, I don't care anymore about informing those who pretend they want to be informed. I know all of the shills on here. If anybody wants a list, just PM me. If you are the unfortunate employer of these ineffective shills with zero skills, I could be available if the price is right..
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I wish I would have thought of that a long time ago. I really only want to post to discuss issues with people who are aware of the issues. It saves me from wasting my time posting "proof" for shills who really don't want the "proof". They (you) never acknowledge it no matter how good it is. I could post an HD video of Bush blowing Cheney to prove that Bush and Cheney are homos, and shills don't acknowledge it because they are shills. They're not genuine posters who are willing to follow strict debate rules. Rule number one is do not enter a debate if you don't plan to concede when proven wrong. Rule number two is when asked to post links proving yourself correct - If you don't post them yet you keep on yackin', you don't qualify and I no longer have time to keep engaging just for sport. Making an assclown out of you is amusing only for so long. For this reason, I don't care anymore about informing those who pretend they want to be informed. I know all of the shills on here. If anybody wants a list, just PM me. If you are the unfortunate employer of these ineffective shills with zero skills, I could be available if the price is right..

Yeah, I bet you wish you did. That whole "your argument is total bull****, and you don't have any evidence" thing must really crimp your style huh.

You mean you wanted an echo chamber full of people parroting your fantasies. Sorry bud, that isn't thus kind of website.

Except you don't post "proof"; you post easily debunked crap. You coming up with another fantasy to complain about people not taking your fantasies seriously doesn't help your cause.....at all, by the way.

That's funny. You must have to do an awful lot of conceding then, because you have been proven wrong dozens of times on this website alone.

I hate to break it to you bud, I have posted links--- dozens of them, in fact. That's always about the time you lose it, going into hysterics about "evil Jews" and the CIA conspiracy and nine hundred other fantasy boogeymen you've created for yourself.

The only one who looks like an "assclown" is you, with your defense of brutal dictators like Gaddafi and your incredibly amusing fantasy that I work for the government.

Hey, maybe you work for the government. After all, it's hard to think of any other posters who have so throughly debunked--- via their own inability to face facts---the crap that they spew.
 
Yeah, I bet you wish you did. That whole "your argument is total bull****, and you don't have any evidence" thing must really crimp your style huh.

You mean you wanted an echo chamber full of people parroting your fantasies. Sorry bud, that isn't thus kind of website.

Except you don't post "proof"; you post easily debunked crap. You coming up with another fantasy to complain about people not taking your fantasies seriously doesn't help your cause.....at all, by the way.

That's funny. You must have to do an awful lot of conceding then, because you have been proven wrong dozens of times on this website alone.

I hate to break it to you bud, I have posted links--- dozens of them, in fact. That's always about the time you lose it, going into hysterics about "evil Jews" and the CIA conspiracy and nine hundred other fantasy boogeymen you've created for yourself.

The only one who looks like an "assclown" is you, with your defense of brutal dictators like Gaddafi and your incredibly amusing fantasy that I work for the government.

Hey, maybe you work for the government. After all, it's hard to think of any other posters who have so throughly debunked--- via their own inability to face facts---the crap that they spew.


Yeah, you can go back and see that I have conceded when proven wrong. Not as many as you say, but there have been several times where I've stood corrected. That means I'm a genuine poster who knows the rules for a productive and true debate.

Shills NEVER concede. I haven't checked, but I'll go out on a limb and say that you have NEVER conceded. If you posted a link from your history showing that you conceded just one time, it would be a great opportunity for you to prove me wrong, but you can't, because I'm right. You are definitely a shill. And not very good at it.
 
:lamo

Love how you desperately try to dodge the whole “proving you are correct” problem by simply declaring you are correct, no evidence needed :roll:

Nobody is buying your fairy tales

Another telltale sign of a shill is never contributing any input on the subject matter. You posted only to try to discredit the OP. That is all you ever do. You never show any interest in the actual content of the thread which begs the question why are you here? You spend a lot of time on here (probably the equivalent of an 8-hour work day doh!!) yet every post is just to harass the OP. This is a debate forum where you talk about concerns and other issues.

Have you ever started a thread? I'll go out on a limb and say no. Why? because shills don't start threads. It's that simple. Shills don't voice concerns either. All their posts are just attacking the OP. Are all your posts just attacking the OP? I'll go out on a limb again and go with yeah.
 
Another telltale sign of a shill is never contributing any input on the subject matter. You posted only to try to discredit the OP. That is all you ever do. You never show any interest in the actual content of the thread which begs the question why are you here? You spend a lot of time on here (probably the equivalent of an 8-hour work day doh!!) yet every post is just to harass the OP. This is a debate forum where you talk about concerns and other issues.

Have you ever started a thread? I'll go out on a limb and say no. Why? because shills don't start threads. It's that simple. Shills don't voice concerns either. All their posts are just attacking the OP. Are all your posts just attacking the OP? I'll go out on a limb again and go with yeah.

It would be nice to see documentation on that higher clearance than the president thing.
 
Rogue factions of the intelligence agencies and MIC are out of control with the constant school shootings as they try to advance the traitorous agenda of disarming the people. Make no mistake - they are the root of all the world's problems and it's not going to stop until that swamp is drained (don't ask me to provide "proof" of anything. I'm not here to prove anything. This discussion is for those who have done their research and have been able to discern enough to see through the fake media. I posted in CT section to save the mods the trouble).

Problem: How do you drain the swamp of the MIC who are so deeply embedded that there are people there with higher security clearances than the President?

Proposed solution: We shut down for the sole purpose of directing the focus of the entire nation on this one issue.. I mean nobody goes to work - nobody does anything until congress outlaws security clearances higher than the President and roots these people out.

Any other ideas?

As we all know (so I wont bother providing data on) our government is but a part of the secret world federation complex instituted after the Frangots became our overlords last year. Resistance is futile and any attempt at rebellion has been and will be met with the death and destruction clearly defined by what has happened in Syria.
 
Another telltale sign of a shill is never contributing any input on the subject matter. You posted only to try to discredit the OP. That is all you ever do. You never show any interest in the actual content of the thread which begs the question why are you here? You spend a lot of time on here (probably the equivalent of an 8-hour work day doh!!) yet every post is just to harass the OP. This is a debate forum where you talk about concerns and other issues.

Have you ever started a thread? I'll go out on a limb and say no. Why? because shills don't start threads. It's that simple. Shills don't voice concerns either. All their posts are just attacking the OP. Are all your posts just attacking the OP? I'll go out on a limb again and go with yeah.

Planet Earth calling Skitzo......
 
...and I don't think there are any other countries who would allow a branch of government to operate in the shadows, steal black budget money, remain completely anonymous, have the resources of the military and intelligence community at their disposal, and answer to no one because they have higher security clearances than the President! No wonder we have this perpetual circus going on.

We have this situation because we ignored Ike's warning in 1961.

A more important question would be "having ignored Ike's warning for 55 years, is there actually anything we can do to change things?"

Negative, we cannot. The bad guys are firmly in command of the situation.
 
Another telltale sign of a shill is never contributing any input on the subject matter. You posted only to try to discredit the OP. That is all you ever do. You never show any interest in the actual content of the thread which begs the question why are you here? You spend a lot of time on here (probably the equivalent of an 8-hour work day doh!!) yet every post is just to harass the OP. This is a debate forum where you talk about concerns and other issues.

Have you ever started a thread? I'll go out on a limb and say no. Why? because shills don't start threads. It's that simple. Shills don't voice concerns either. All their posts are just attacking the OP. Are all your posts just attacking the OP? I'll go out on a limb again and go with yeah.


Another tell tale sign of a poster who lives in a fantasy world--- like you, for instance--- is that none of your posts ever are even slightly valid. I hate to break it to you but nobody has an obligation to give you "input" on a delusion when you aren't even interested in providing evidence that your claims are true.

Your posts inherently discredit themselves --- I merely point out the blinding holes in logic an srelaiyy that exist within them and watch your whole argument crumble in the face of the real world.

Apparently your math skills are yet another thing you need to work on. You crying about how long you fantasize I am on this board, and being totally wrong, does not add any crediblity to your other fantasies.


Gee, sounds like somebody's mad I've exposed their garbage......yet again.
 
Yeah, you can go back and see that I have conceded when proven wrong. Not as many as you say, but there have been several times where I've stood corrected. That means I'm a genuine poster who knows the rules for a productive and true debate.

Shills NEVER concede. I haven't checked, but I'll go out on a limb and say that you have NEVER conceded. If you posted a link from your history showing that you conceded just one time, it would be a great opportunity for you to prove me wrong, but you can't, because I'm right. You are definitely a shill. And not very good at it.

Yep, and you have been proven wrong, like I said, dozens of times. Case in point? Your support of Gaddafi, yet your total ignorance about the basic facts about the man, such as his direct ordering of terrorist attacks in the West using Libyan "diplomats" and arming every terrorist group under the sun.

Lol "genuine". One can only hope you don't actually believe the idiocy you claim is "truth".

No, I have never admitted that the lunacy you post is true.......because it isn't. Sorry that you are so offended that I call your crap what it is.....crap.
 
Unfortunately, can’t say I am in the “know” and can contribute much to the conversation.

I voted “yes” directly to the question, as a concept, I think the “president” although obviously more important than say a “queen of England” type is still mostly ceremony and being elected by a mob does not entitle nor qualify one to know every interworking of state.

That said, the government itself is too large which I would say is root cause of any troubles with the influence of “deep state” cabals. Unchecked such power is no doubt a great danger. It is always important when making such structures to divide power.
 
Back
Top Bottom