• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Prove me wrong, we landed on the moon

HenryLewis said:
One sample was fake. We have hundreds of samples which we have taken pictures of and which are still on display. One example of a fake moon rock is in no way evidence that all the rocks brought back were fake.

1989LPSC...19..147N Page 147

Quit trolling.
Click to expand...

Man, the dominos are falling. The, alleged, moonrocks came , among others, from Antartica.Well, that is, if it wasn't petrified wood!

shame on nasa!! petrified wood! You should get angry at nasa! the lied to us (all the time)!



How easily people are fooled.
 
I am a geologist, I have looked at images of thin sections of lunar basalts before on numerous occasions. They are nothing but extra-terrestrial. Just the thought of confusing petrified wood with a basalt is so outrageous that it discredits your entire premise.

Basalt is igneous, meaning that it has no stratification or internal structure. It is like a soup. Petrified wood has extremely well defined structure to it, a first semester geology student would could tell them apart with a 100% success rate. This isn't even getting into the geochemistry, the size of the crystals or the age of the sample.
 
Last edited:
HenryLewis said:
I am a geologist, I have looked at images of thin sections of lunar basalts before on numerous occasions. They are nothing but extra-terrestrial. Just the thought of confusing petrified wood with a basalt is so outrageous that it discredits your entire premise.

Basalt is igneous, meaning that it has no stratification or internal structure. It is like a soup. Petrified wood has extremely well defined structure to it, a first semester geology student would could tell them apart with a 100% success rate. This isn't even getting into the geochemistry, the size of the crystals or the age of the sample.
Click to expand...

lol, well I didn't gave petrified wood! NASA did! you can't deny that. and btw I din't think there is ever a 100% succes rate, so that is nonsense, and, seemingly, people fell for it. So don't blame me that the idiots at NASA gave petrified wood, lol


what a whole joke the moonlanding is, the more you delve into it, the more you see how ridiculous it all is, and what a huge hoax it was. I wonder what else NASA would lie about? ;)
 
And there is more...

11buzz_watch1.jpg
 
well, me thinks he is proved wrong! 'they' never were on the moon!
 
Oh, this thread is hilarious.

Thanks for the laugh.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom