• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why the silence on Vegas?

Almost 6 months later and we still know as much as we did the day after. Before you just attack the source and dismiss it, I challenge you to read it with an open mind as many valid questions are asked.

WAYNE ALLYN ROOT=> The Vegas Massacre Exposé: What Really Happened?

MORE AT THE LINK

========================
So here are my “Top 20” nagging questions, inconsistencies and theories about the Vegas Massacre…
#1) RAMBO.
How did an overweight, out of shape, 60-year old, anonymous guy (on no one’s radar) with no military training and no military or law enforcement history become Rambo overnight? He carried out this plot with no help? Got hundreds of pounds of weapons to his room? He broke open a hurricane-strength 800- pound window? Set up sniper-type guns? Pulled off worst mass shooting in America’s history with no training, no help? Even though the one over-riding theme of every survivor/witness I’ve spoken to, or heard from is…they saw or heard multiple shooters. Yet the FBI and Vegas police immediately discounted this theory. Why?

Media blackout on a mass shooting in a MOB town that was committed by a "high-roller" with probable MOB ties? You don't say! The next thing you'll tell me is there is a huge disinformation campaign that involves smearing everyone EXCEPT local mobsters!!
 
But NOT at the same time.

Right Rich, the "shooter" had 2 different rifles about 200 yards apart, and was running back and forth between the 2 sites. :lamo
 
Right Rich, the "shooter" had 2 different rifles about 200 yards apart, and was running back and forth between the 2 sites. :lamo

You do realize your statement is based on the assumption that Adam's work is correct. :mrgreen:
 
You do realize your statement is based on the assumption that Adam's work is correct. :mrgreen:

Yes Mike, I do, and until you can provide a forensic acoustic analysis performed by LVPD, I will continue to stand with Adams. So far, after insinuating you could provide such work by LVPD, you have failed to offer anything like it. That's because Adams' work is too damn accurate and all the authorities have offered is lip service and contradictions. Pictures of the hotel room and bump stocks don't prove a thing, and the 20 or 30 pieces of brass on the floor show the story to be very deficient, right off the bat.

How could the guy fire the required hundreds of rounds at least, when all that was on the floor was 20 or 30?

Common Sense, Michael, common sense and an understanding that the authorities are so often lying through their teeth.
 
Guys, it's hopeless. The truther routine is designed to convert the absence of evidence into evidence of the conspiracy's existence (the conspiracy withholding the evidence, that's why there isn't any proving a conspiracy!), and an always-baseless rejection of the actual evidence (this often involves relentlessly defending one lone kook who's "analysis" has been debunked despite the debunking, or counter factuals "I, the truther, say that X is the only thing that should have happened - but "they" are saying something else did. CONSPIRACY!"). If someone gets engaged in the details, one notices that the truther will invariably start attacking this person and/or claiming that the truther has some specific sleuthing skills that nobody else does - but you'll just have to trust the truther on that.

Instead of playing the truther game, look at every single event the truther has tried to discuss. Read what they say. It's always the same ****ing pattern.




It's designed to provide excuses for the truther's perpetual inability to prove their claim.

It's designed to try to bog down everyone who takes the truther up on his game in mire after mire of non-issues. Each of those non-issues has its ultimate root in some requirement-of-belief that the truther himself has created out of thin air. (for example, in the parkland thread, the truther relies on a claim that the video of kids being shot should have been released by now to cast doubt on the investigation. But there is no such requirement. There is no duty to release unless and until the prosecution intends to offer it at trial, and then the defense gets it. Sometimes police release videos. Somtimes they don't. There is no requirement. Same game here with "silence" claims.).

It's designed to dismiss actual evidence while converting the absence of evidence into proof of the conspiracy's existence. Again, that relies on the creation of non-issue for purposes of bootstrapping the truther theory into existence.

Etc etc etc.




I actually got a kick out of pointing this out on another forum, whereby I was labeled a CENTCOM agent, clearly employed to cast doubt on those "just asking questions".
 
Right Rich, the "shooter" had 2 different rifles about 200 yards apart, and was running back and forth between the 2 sites. :lamo


No, the two windows in his suite were feet apart.

No evidence exists of rounds striking casualties from any other source than Paddock's suite....unless you know otherwise ?
 
No, the two windows in his suite were feet apart.

No evidence exists of rounds striking casualties from any other source than Paddock's suite....unless you know otherwise ?

Mike Adams did his own forensic acoustic analysis with what he could find on the internet in the way of cellphone information, and he determined firing coming from 2 different locations by 2 different guns.

If you're interested in watching a good explanation try https://www.naturalnews.com/2017-10...ce-and-range-of-second-las-vegas-shooter.html
 
Mike Adams did his own forensic acoustic analysis with what he could find on the internet in the way of cellphone information, and he determined firing coming from 2 different locations by 2 different guns.

If you're interested in watching a good explanation try https://www.naturalnews.com/2017-10...ce-and-range-of-second-las-vegas-shooter.html


That web page states "...when the audio from the Las Vegas shooting is analyzed, it reveals TWO shooters operating at the same time..."

This isn't true.

The key element of the audio is that no TWO guns are heard firing at the SAME time.
 
The government did it. It fits the Joker MO I have uncovered on my blog.


jokers.jpg

More goodies @
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top Bottom