• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Which one looks stronger? WTC floor truss.....

G

gerrycan

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 4, 2016
Messages
1,822
Reaction score
84
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
What NIST saw.....
NIST anim.jpg

Reality.....
c652364007bb90a413a94a2832cd6d95.jpg
 
Can you provide a little context for either photo because I have no idea what the hell you're asking
 
Deuce said:
Can you provide a little context for either photo because I have no idea what the hell you're asking
Click to expand...

It's a rhetorical question. The floor system in the WTC was far more substantial than is apparent from the official report.
 
gerrycan said:
It's a rhetorical question. The floor system in the WTC was far more substantial than is apparent from the official report.
Click to expand...

Interesting rhetorical question in the OP.

Who is correct , AE911T (Gage) who claims nanothermite was most likely used in the destruction of the towers and no nuclear weapons or Jeff Prager who claims no nanothermite but mini nukes (neutron bombs) were used in the destruction. Which one to choose?. Both claim to be correct. Both provide "evidence" and explanations.
 
gerrycan said:
It's a rhetorical question. The floor system in the WTC was far more substantial than is apparent from the official report.
Click to expand...

Out of context I have no reason to expect either photo is from the WTC. Hence my request.
 
mike2810 said:
Interesting rhetorical question in the OP.
Click to expand...

You really should make a bigger effort to understand the English you seek to use in your distractions and diversions, mike.

There was no question in the OP. What you poorly perceived as a rhetorical question, you don't even seem to know what a 'rhetorical question' is, is actually your go to distraction/diversion when you see material that illustrates just how flimsy the USGOCT is, which is always, every post, even ones from the Zero Evidence Club.
 
Deuce said:
Out of context I have no reason to expect either photo is from the WTC. Hence my request.
Click to expand...

There is nothing out of context, Deuce, save for the totally phony NIST/official story photo which doesn't reflect reality in the least. A child could have figure this out.

Let me explain. The NIST/official story photo, which was part of a massive propaganda push, seems to have forgotten the concrete and all the rebar.

How did you miss this?
 
camlok said:
You really should make a bigger effort to understand the English you seek to use in your distractions and diversions, mike.

There was no question in the OP. What you poorly perceived as a rhetorical question, you don't even seem to know what a 'rhetorical question' is, is actually your go to distraction/diversion when you see material that illustrates just how flimsy the USGOCT is, which is always, every post, even ones from the Zero Evidence Club.
Click to expand...

It was gerrycan in post 3 that stated, "It's a rhetorical question." Take it up with him as being "poorly perceived".
 
Last edited:
mike2810 said:
It was gerrycan in post 3 that stated, "It's a rhetorical question." Take it up with him as being "poorly perceived".
Click to expand...

I am comfortable with my lack of ability when it comes to the english language though. Are you ?

I see what Cam meant, I don't disagree......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom