• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Cover-up of the century, who killed MLK?

cuban smokes said:
MLK caused the gubmint a lot of problems; JER, not so much ....... use your noodle man ...........
Click to expand...

Yep. Let us always blame someone in the government. :mrgreen:

What does a "racist" person gain by killing someone of a race they do not like? Your original question is a bait/loaded question as stated earlier. A racist may kill without any personal gain from the murder. "use your noodle man.........."
 
cuban smokes said:
who had the most to gain with MLK out of the picture, JER, or the gubmint?
Click to expand...



A: the cause of ZIONISM, which offed him and framed a KKKer in the process.



LBJ didn't care about 'nam except for keeping it going to keep America's war factories humming and sending those arms to ISRAEL, which is exactly what LBJ did.

MLK's son Dexter was not fooled and in 1997 came out and named LBJ as the primary person behind the assassination, just as LBJ was for JFK....
 
mike2810 said:
Yep. Let us always blame someone in the government. :mrgreen:

What does a "racist" person gain by killing someone of a race they do not like? Your original question is a bait/loaded question as stated earlier. A racist may kill without any personal gain from the murder. "use your noodle man.........."
Click to expand...




Take it from the son who did his homework....


Son of Dr. King Asserts L.B.J. Role in Plot - The New York Times


"Three months ago, Dexter Scott King declared that he and his family believed that James Earl Ray was not guilty of the murder of his father, the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Tonight, in a televised interview, Mr. King asserted that President Lyndon B. Johnson must have been part of a military and governmental conspiracy to kill Dr. King."




and THAT is why the Israeli owned "US" media never gives Dexter King the time of day....
 
Thoreau72 said:
In the spirit of the MLK holiday, a little bit of truth discovered by the barrister William Peppers, and the only jury to ever hear the case against James Earl Ray.

The jury found that Ray did NOT kill MLK.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/who-killed-martin-luther-king-the-cover-up-of-the-century/5502343

For some who cannot tolerate the truth presented by Global Research this will be offensive, and I'm sorry.

For others curious about the truth, this article is a good condensation of William Peppers' book "Enemy Of The State".

Yes it was a conspiracy. I hope this is in the right section.
Click to expand...

Michel Chossudovsky, the lone founder of this blog is a well known, long discredited conspiracy theorist when he's not teaching economics. None of any of his allegations have ever proven out. He is also, like the inventor of fake news; the opening paragraph makes statements so far from the accepted theory without a shred of supported evidence, accepting THEM as the basis for building a rickety bridge of mis-information that crumbles once examined.

I believe this was the Ottawa professor who came to Vancouver to lecture about the 'faked moon landing.' The entire basis of his theory, the radiation belt went to **** when he had to concede to an astronomy student that the radiation is a fraction of what you would receive for a tooth x-ray.

I do believe I just wasted a whole lot of time. I don't think I'll be following your posts in the future
 
mike2810 said:
Pretty loaded question. You tell us?

All depends on who you believer JER was. Was he a staunch white supremacist or not.
As far as the government, I don't know what they would gain.
Click to expand...

That's not a loaded question, it is a question any investigator would ask himself.

You're just not curious Mike. You are morbidly incurious, for whatever reason.

And the obvious answer to that compelling question is the government. He had just called out the government for the Vietnam war. He was an advocate for peace and love, and the government is into aggression, hate and war. And he had the public's ear, including white folk who were sick of the war.

In fact Peppers talked to at least one former NG or Army Reserve enlisted man, there was a team of 2 and they were snipers but knew only the location at a certain time of their target. In the end, they did not fire and threw the weapons in the Mississippi as they left town.
 
Fearandloathing said:
Michel Chossudovsky, the lone founder of this blog is a well known, long discredited conspiracy theorist when he's not teaching economics. None of any of his allegations have ever proven out. He is also, like the inventor of fake news; the opening paragraph makes statements so far from the accepted theory without a shred of supported evidence, accepting THEM as the basis for building a rickety bridge of mis-information that crumbles once examined.

I believe this was the Ottawa professor who came to Vancouver to lecture about the 'faked moon landing.' The entire basis of his theory, the radiation belt went to **** when he had to concede to an astronomy student that the radiation is a fraction of what you would receive for a tooth x-ray.

I do believe I just wasted a whole lot of time. I don't think I'll be following your posts in the future
Click to expand...

Well I'm sorry to have inconvenienced you, and will remember that in the future.

I've been reading Chussodovsky for a number of years now, and long before I ever met him at Global Research I had read the book by William Peppers, Enemy Of The State. I eventually gave the book to a black friend at work, and never got it back.

Peppers found truth and delivered some form of justice for the King family.

Global Research came down on the right side of truth, the right side of justice in publishing discussion of Peppers work. You have come down on the wrong side. The truth is often painful.
 
Thoreau72 said:
That's not a loaded question, it is a question any investigator would ask himself.

You're just not curious Mike. You are morbidly incurious, for whatever reason.

And the obvious answer to that compelling question is the government. He had just called out the government for the Vietnam war. He was an advocate for peace and love, and the government is into aggression, hate and war. And he had the public's ear, including white folk who were sick of the war.

In fact Peppers talked to at least one former NG or Army Reserve enlisted man, there was a team of 2 and they were snipers but knew only the location at a certain time of their target. In the end, they did not fire and threw the weapons in the Mississippi as they left town.
Click to expand...


talking common sense to the brain dead is a hard row to hoe .............
 
Thoreau72 said:
Well I'm sorry to have inconvenienced you, and will remember that in the future.

I've been reading Chussodovsky for a number of years now, and long before I ever met him at Global Research I had read the book by William Peppers, Enemy Of The State. I eventually gave the book to a black friend at work, and never got it back.

Peppers found truth and delivered some form of justice for the King family.

Global Research came down on the right side of truth, the right side of justice in publishing discussion of Peppers work. You have come down on the wrong side. The truth is often painful.
Click to expand...


and it would seem the US Gubmint often comes up reeking of **** ..........
 
mike2810 said:
Yep. Let us always blame someone in the government. :mrgreen:

What does a "racist" person gain by killing someone of a race they do not like? Your original question is a bait/loaded question as stated earlier. A racist may kill without any personal gain from the murder. "use your noodle man.........."
Click to expand...

so, what you are saying is that white racist are even more ****ing dumbass that previously believed ............... yep, I got that ........
 
Thoreau72 said:
That's not a loaded question, it is a question any investigator would ask himself.

You're just not curious Mike. You are morbidly incurious, for whatever reason.

And the obvious answer to that compelling question is the government. He had just called out the government for the Vietnam war. He was an advocate for peace and love, and the government is into aggression, hate and war. And he had the public's ear, including white folk who were sick of the war.

In fact Peppers talked to at least one former NG or Army Reserve enlisted man, there was a team of 2 and they were snipers but knew only the location at a certain time of their target. In the end, they did not fire and threw the weapons in the Mississippi as they left town.
Click to expand...

No. Only in your world does the government become the primary suspect.
Nice story. Too bad there is no real evidence to back it up.

MLK murder was a sad and tragic event. As was the murder of JFK and Robert Kennedy. Just to name a few.
 
cuban smokes said:
so, what you are saying is that white racist are even more ****ing dumbass that previously believed ............... yep, I got that ........
Click to expand...

One way of putting it.
 
mike2810 said:
No. Only in your world does the government become the primary suspect.
Nice story. Too bad there is no real evidence to back it up.

MLK murder was a sad and tragic event. As was the murder of JFK and Robert Kennedy. Just to name a few.
Click to expand...

No Mike. In your world the government is a credible hero, concerned only with your well being.

In the real world, the factual world, the government overthrows legitimate governments, kills innocents with drones and bombs, it gathers all our information, and more, as Snowden and other whistleblowers have shown.

MLK, RFK and JFK were all taken out because they were a threat to the military industrial complex and the status quo. That you cannot face that truth simply demonstrates your cognitive dissonance.
 
LaDexter said:
And there's a MOSSAD "off duty" from framing Islam for another "terror" attack on the US.


Let's start with the most unlikely, Pan Am 103...

LIBYA did it - correct.

So how is ISRAEL responsible?


Type Gaddafi Jewish into any search engine and read what the ISRAELI MEDIA has to say...


https://www.timesofisrael.com/gadda...discovered-his-mother-was-jewish-claims-aide/

"Muammar Gaddafi, Libya’s deposed leader, ordered his ambassador to Italy killed for revealing that his mother was Jewish, Gaddafi’s chief of protocol claimed in an interview"


Libya?s Gaddafi had a history of reaching out to Israel - Israel News - Jerusalem Post

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/142593

"There have been rumors in the past about Libyan leader Moammar Qaddafi's Jewish roots, and now it seems to be confirmed. Israel National News TV met with Gita Boaron, who claims that the Libyan dictator is indeed Jewish and that she is a distant cousin."




and THAT is how a "war on Islamic Terror" made an "ally" out of the "islamic dictator" behind Pan Am 103....

Gaddafi was JEWISH.

THAT is why he and GEORGE TENET were such GREAT PALS - they both committed Zionist TERROR against the US and used it to help Israel and ZIONISM....



Want another - just ask....
Click to expand...

Uh....no. I get that you, like all CTers, don't understand what a fact is, but Gaddafi was not Jewish, and there is literally zero evidence that he was, or that Mossad was involved in Libya at all.
 
an interesting video of the attorney who (with his son) represented james earl ray until one day prior to the criminal trial; he asks some provocative questions and makes some valid observations:


Hanes [the younger attorney] said physical evidence points away from Ray as the killer, saying he has held the bullet that killed King in his hand and could tell the distinct markings did not match the Remington.

He said Ray didn’t have a motive, despite what police and prosecutors have said.

“Dr. King just wasn’t on his radar screen,” Hanes said. “He wasn’t political…that just wasn’t part of his life or his makeup.”
Click to expand...

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/04/as...ced-pawn-conspiracy-dr-king-just-wasnt-radar/
 
James Earl Ray was a patsy, the same as so many others including McVeigh and Oswald. Likely Cruz too.
 
Tigerace117 said:
Except you don’t seem to comprehend the fact that 1) for a time we’d thought we had gotten OBL in the strikes at Tora Bora before realizing he’d escaped; 2) your knee jerk belief in conspiracy theories with no evidence is deeply amusing
Click to expand...

One highlight: It saves many of us the time to know who and who not to take seriously.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom