• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The UFO Conspiracy - Truth: "Aliens" are Fallen Angels



That was merely a cut from the original video and did not belong to the host. I suggest you get your facts straight.



Watch the full documentary. The truth about the video is as follows...an anonymous man named Victor claiming to have worked at Area 51, said that he smuggled the video out. Victor contacted Tom Coleman, President of Rocket Pictures, who made a documentary about it. The documentary is above. This is were the video comes from. Bytele is just some person on the internet who cut and copied the claimed alien interview from the original documentary, posted it on youtube and described it as a funny prank. His involvement in the video would not go any further than this. Sorry, to find you so gullible. It is in fact one of the most highly controversial alien video's on the internet. To my knowledge, it has not ever been proven as a fake.
 
Last edited:

How weak. Did you even bother reading it?

(1) It is very surprising that an interview with an extraterrestrial thing is happening in the dark. While the narrator (Victor) mentions that the room has been kept dark on purpose for the comfort of the aliens, but that does not explain the reason behind the darkness. The alien didn’t look to be too sensitive to the torch beams at the end of the video though.

It is well known through the Alien Community that they are light sensitive.

(2) Nothing but the head and a little part of the shoulders are being seen in the alien interview video. If an extraordinary thing like an ET would have been interviewed and if that was being recorded on tape, is not sensible to capture the full body of the creature?

It was merely a recording of an alien being interview. It was not made to prove alien existence.

(3) The alien’s head movement was very puppet-like. While there is limited knowledge about the muscle movements of the aliens, but the moves that were made by the alien in the interview video looked very mechanical and far for being natural.

Alien abductees report that this is in deed how they move.

(4) It was mentioned that aliens could get rid of germs and microbial entities from the air, and then we find the alien getting sick by breathing the planet’s air.

They were not speaking of absolutes.

(5) The photos that were shown by ex aerospace engineer Boy Bushman does not match with the alien that is seen in the video. Bushman, who was deployed at Area 51 had shown many photos of alleged aliens who, as per Bushman, used to stay in the underground vaults of Area 51. It is most unlikely that two different looking aliens would have existed at the same time.

How would they possibly know whether there was two aliens or not?

(6) At the last part of the video when the alien falls sick, two men, supposedly doctors, rush in to examine the being. All they do is put hold his head and try to look into the orifice of his mouth. The whole gesture of the ‘doctors’ look so artificial and they certainly did not look like examining the way real doctors would check their patients, especially if the patient is someone out of this world.

Doctors of such nature would be hired on there ability to keep a secret and not their professionalism.

(7) The alien was supposedly seated inside a bio-confinement area so that it is not exposed to any earthly germs, and then it is seen that the doctors who take care of the being are wearing half sleeve shirts. Didn’t we know that any such sanitized area has the requirement of specific dresses that covers the full body?

Again, doctors of such nature would be hired on there ability to keep a secret and not their professionalism.

There is not evidence here.
 
1) You know this, how?
2) Um... okay then.
3) And we can trust them, why?
4) Fine.
5) Okay, fine. I'll let you slide.
6) Secrets can't be kept forever.
7) See above.
 
How weak. Did you even bother reading it?

(1) It is very surprising that an interview with an extraterrestrial thing is happening in the dark. While the narrator (Victor) mentions that the room has been kept dark on purpose for the comfort of the aliens, but that does not explain the reason behind the darkness. The alien didn’t look to be too sensitive to the torch beams at the end of the video though.

It is well known through the Alien Community that they are light sensitive.

(2) Nothing but the head and a little part of the shoulders are being seen in the alien interview video. If an extraordinary thing like an ET would have been interviewed and if that was being recorded on tape, is not sensible to capture the full body of the creature?

It was merely a recording of an alien being interview. It was not made to prove alien existence.

(3) The alien’s head movement was very puppet-like. While there is limited knowledge about the muscle movements of the aliens, but the moves that were made by the alien in the interview video looked very mechanical and far for being natural.

Alien abductees report that this is in deed how they move.

(4) It was mentioned that aliens could get rid of germs and microbial entities from the air, and then we find the alien getting sick by breathing the planet’s air.

They were not speaking of absolutes.

(5) The photos that were shown by ex aerospace engineer Boy Bushman does not match with the alien that is seen in the video. Bushman, who was deployed at Area 51 had shown many photos of alleged aliens who, as per Bushman, used to stay in the underground vaults of Area 51. It is most unlikely that two different looking aliens would have existed at the same time.

How would they possibly know whether there was two aliens or not?

(6) At the last part of the video when the alien falls sick, two men, supposedly doctors, rush in to examine the being. All they do is put hold his head and try to look into the orifice of his mouth. The whole gesture of the ‘doctors’ look so artificial and they certainly did not look like examining the way real doctors would check their patients, especially if the patient is someone out of this world.

Doctors of such nature would be hired on there ability to keep a secret and not their professionalism.

(7) The alien was supposedly seated inside a bio-confinement area so that it is not exposed to any earthly germs, and then it is seen that the doctors who take care of the being are wearing half sleeve shirts. Didn’t we know that any such sanitized area has the requirement of specific dresses that covers the full body?

Again, doctors of such nature would be hired on there ability to keep a secret and not their professionalism.

There is not evidence here.

It's an obvious fake. You believe because you want to believe.
 
Watch the full documentary. The truth about the video is as follows...an anonymous man named Victor claiming to have worked at Area 51
Wrong. "Victor" never claimed to have worked at Area 51. the only thing he says is he "had reason to be present at Area 51".

, said that he smuggled the video out.
Wrong. He did not smuggle the video out. He says he made a copy of the original when the tapes were being converted to digital and were in a less secure place.

Victor contacted Tom Coleman, President of Rocket Pictures, who made a documentary about it. The documentary is above.
Wrong. The video above is from 2014-15 on The Alien Interview Channel. See number 3 below. The original, number 1 below, was directed by Jeff Broadstreet who produced such other "real" documentaries like Night of the Living Dead 3D and Night of the Living Dead 3D: Re-Animation.

1. A VHS tape produced in 1997
https://www.ebay.com/i/192410144501?rt=nc

2. A special edition produced in 2008
AREA 51: THE ALIEN INTERVIEW - SPECIAL EDITION DVD

3. An edition , which you linked above, was produced exclusively for The Alien Interview Channel. The published date is 2015 from that channel.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLRl5AAvEBU&feature=player_embedded
Partial quote from the description on the The Alien Interview Channel:
Now in High Definition for the first time, this 2014 Enhanced Edition of the cult documentary includes newly enhanced re-creation segments and was produced exclusively for The Alien Interview Channel.
 
I don't have the time, So I am not going to debate much.

Wrong. "Victor" never claimed to have worked at Area 51. the only thing he says is he "had reason to be present at Area 51".
Even if he was there as a sub-contractor, he was still working for Area 51.


Wrong. He did not smuggle the video out. He says he made a copy of the original when the tapes were being converted to digital and were in a less secure place.
Even if a copy was made, he still had to smuggle it out. Even the producer says this. The material was said to be top secret. It could have not been removed any other way.


Wrong. The video above is from 2014-15 on The Alien Interview Channel. See number 3 below. The original, number 1 below, was directed by Jeff Broadstreet who produced such other "real" documentaries like Night of the Living Dead 3D and Night of the Living Dead 3D: Re-Animation.

1. A VHS tape produced in 1997
https://www.ebay.com/i/192410144501?rt=nc

2. A special edition produced in 2008
AREA 51: THE ALIEN INTERVIEW - SPECIAL EDITION DVD

3. An edition , which you linked above, was produced exclusively for The Alien Interview Channel. The published date is 2015 from that channel.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLRl5AAvEBU&feature=player_embedded
Partial quote from the description on the The Alien Interview Channel:
You are correct. I made an error. That was not the original documentary. But this has no bearing on the validity of the interview. You have managed to prove that it is not a "funny prank video" as many here has claimed. Thank you for that.
 
I don't have the time, So I am not going to debate much.

Even if he was there as a sub-contractor, he was still working for Area 51.


Even if a copy was made, he still had to smuggle it out. Even the producer says this. The material was said to be top secret. It could have not been removed any other way.


You are correct. I made an error. That was not the original documentary. But this has no bearing on the validity of the interview. You have managed to prove that it is not a "funny prank video" as many here has claimed. Thank you for that.

It is a prank video.
 
Even if he was there as a sub-contractor, he was still working for Area 51.
Wrong again. he never states that he worked at Area 51. He says he was just there.

Even if a copy was made, he still had to smuggle it out. Even the producer says this. The material was said to be top secret. It could have not been removed any other way.
Riiiggghhhhtttt. SO top secret that he was able to make a copy without anyone noticing and get it out of the base.

:roll:

You are correct. I made an error. That was not the original documentary. But this has no bearing on the validity of the interview. You have managed to prove that it is not a "funny prank video" as many here has claimed. Thank you for that.
Yes it does! The validity is in question. Nobody has proven it to be real either. Goes both ways.
 
Some Christians, including myself, believe that aliens are some of the fallen angels.

Have you heard of David M. Jacobs?
 
Back
Top Bottom