• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Mark Basile's independent WTC dust study delayed yet again...

camlok said:
Thank you for your honesty. At least we all know that Bush/Cheney et al lied their asses off. Not to mention hundreds of millions of Americans and other westerners, ... right, mike?

It's reassuring and heart warming that you can discuss the deaths of millions with such deep human caring and compassion.
Click to expand...

American society is corrupt, you just coming to the realization?
 
Fenton Lum said:
American society is corrupt, you just coming to the realization?
Click to expand...

No, not at all, but I do have to admit that I was taken in for a long, long time by the masterful US propaganda system. It truly is a marvel to behold. It is self perpetuating, it is buried deep deep within the US education system.
 
camlok said:
No, not at all, but I do have to admit that I was taken in for a long, long time by the masterful US propaganda system. It truly is a marvel to behold. It is self perpetuating, it is buried deep deep within the US education system.
Click to expand...

It began before the founding.
 
camlok said:
Can you say, or better yet, spell "stunning hypocrite", mike? How long have you zero evidence folks been harping on this total non-issue?

How many deadlines did NIST miss? That's what happens in science. The big difference between NIST and M Basile is that NIST had to cover many lies, had to redo stuff to make it match their predetermined science.

And in an even better example of your stunning hypocrisy, you again focus on picayune nothings and ignore the NANOTHERMITE, the by products of that new generation of super explosives in WTC dust, the molten/vaporized steel, the molten molybdenum, the vaporized lead, the iron microspheres, ... .
Click to expand...

Move the goalpost much? We are talking about Mark B and his so called study. Try to keep up.

Can you spell, "sucker". Please send Mark some more money. Maybe that will inspire him to finish the work.
 
camlok said:
Zero Evidence folks ignore so many
Click to expand...

nonsense sites that controlled demolition supporters believe are the truth. They are not fooled into believing the non science from the CDOCT sites.

This thread is about Mark B study. Interesting how you try to divert the discussion.

Tell us, Why have all these years gone by when Mark B is not doing the analysis. An "independent lab" of his choosing is. Now that is truly "independent". Seems by now he could at least told us which lab he is going to use. But that would take another 4 - 5 years to do.
 
Last edited:
mike2810 said:
Move the goalpost much? We are talking about Mark B and his so called study. Try to keep up.

I know and I pointed out your stunning hypocrisy, which never really sits very well with you. NIST was slower than molasses in January and here you are whining about a citizen's honest attempt to produce a study to find out the truth - that's your real bitch, that and you think it makes for great distraction and diversion.

NANOTHERMITE, mike, in WTC dust, along with the by products, and molten/vaporized steel. You have been sunk since before you started your distractions and diversions.

It screams DESPERATION!

Can you spell, "sucker".
Click to expand...

Little children do copycat stuff.
 
Last edited:
mike2810 said:
nonsense sites that controlled demolition supporters believe are the truth. They are not fooled into believing the non science from the CDOCT sites.

This thread is about Mark B study. Interesting how you try to divert the discussion.

Tell us, Why have all these years gone by when Mark B is not doing the analysis. An "independent lab" of his choosing is. Now that is truly "independent". Seems by now he could at least told us which lab he is going to use. But that would take another 4 - 5 years to do.
Click to expand...

There's zero evidence from you in this post too, mike.

Did you read what Fenton Lum said? How come you always ignore salient things that are right in front of your nose and go for the most lame distractions and diversions possible?
 
Last edited:
mike2810 said:
Tell us, Why have all these years gone by when Mark B is not doing the analysis. An "independent lab" of his choosing is. Now that is truly "independent". Seems by now he could at least told us which lab he is going to use. But that would take another 4 - 5 years to do.
Click to expand...

Why have you, note well, ZERO EVIDENCE CLUB members, spent so much time on a thread that you designed NOT to reveal any truth, but solely to attack an independent scientist who has more expertise and knowledge in his nail clippings than the Zero Evidence Club has in their entire beings, many times over.

You all drone on incessantly about things you have NO knowledge of. AS ALWAYS!!

You provide no real analysis, it's just attack attack attack. If you had any real interest in the truth you would contact those who might be able to help you out. That isn't at all what you want. You want diversions and distractions, anything so you don't have to face up to the facts - there is no evidence to support the USGOCT, so you engage in these petulant, peevish, disagreeable, bilious attacks on a man who has done nothing but attempt to follow his calling.

Look at what YOUR CALLING is!

As Joseph N Welch said to Joe McCarthy,

You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last? Have you left no sense of decency?
 
camlok said:
Why have you, note well, ZERO EVIDENCE CLUB members, spent so much time on a thread that you designed NOT to reveal any truth, but solely to attack an independent scientist who has more expertise and knowledge in his nail clippings than the Zero Evidence Club has in their entire beings, many times over.

You all drone on incessantly about things you have NO knowledge of. AS ALWAYS!!

You provide no real analysis, it's just attack attack attack. If you had any real interest in the truth you would contact those who might be able to help you out. That isn't at all what you want. You want diversions and distractions, anything so you don't have to face up to the facts - there is no evidence to support the USGOCT, so you engage in these petulant, peevish, disagreeable, bilious attacks on a man who has done nothing but attempt to follow his calling.

Look at what YOUR CALLING is!

As Joseph N Welch said to Joe McCarthy,

You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last? Have you left no sense of decency?
Click to expand...

Yes, haven't you done enough. Try discussing the OP. I have. In fact I have asked questions pertaining to the OP. You seem to want to divert to what the govt did or did not do.

I can agree on one thing. I have had enough of your posts to last a life time.
 
mike2810 said:
Yes, haven't you done enough. Try discussing the OP. I have. In fact I have asked questions pertaining to the OP. You seem to want to divert to what the govt did or did not do.
Click to expand...

So you admit you have no sense of decency. Are you going to continue slandering a man when you have no evidence of any wrong doing?

I have been discussing this thread, pointing out that the Zero Evidence Club is using this total non-issue as a means to distract from meaningful, productive discussion.

All the while avoiding reality, which, as we all know, is your sole reason for this thread.

The NIST computer simulation of the collapse of WTC7 doesn't come close to matching reality, but you "great detectives" are on the Basile case.

I can agree on one thing. I have had enough of your posts to last a life time.
Click to expand...

Gee, where have we heard that line before, mike?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom