• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Mark Basile's independent WTC dust study delayed yet again...

All you folks do, mike, is yap back and forth with each other about nothing. The Always Zero Evidence people.
 
camlok said:
You lied, mike, you falsely accused me and you, as I have pointed out a number of times have no sense of decency.

Here you are lying again. I have been discussing the nanothermite, which you USGOCT zero evidence folks lie about all the time, with gamolon, and now all you do is more lies and NOTE, zero evidence.



Earth to mike. That would be because not a one of you can provided any evidence for the USGOCT. You never have. You are too frightened to because you know it is all lies.
Click to expand...


Earth to camlock. In the past I have shown you lied. You tried to play a word game and you got bit. ("Missile" vs. missle). remember?

So prove me wrong. I will try again and let us all see your response.
1) Was Dr. Judy Wood correct in her energy beam as the cause of the WTC 1,2, 77 collapse? Yes or No.
2) Provide your explanation for the controlled demolition of WTC 1,2,7. What was used, who did it, and how?
3) Since you keep referring to the "nanothermite" paper. Please explain how thousands of metric tons on the material NH found and stated would be needed to produce the results was placed in the building without anyone knowing?
4) Explain why Jones is now saying the termite was most likely used as a fuse to set off an explosive like C4?

What you seem to do is call people liars and use the phrase "zero evidence' in broad terms. I have shown you lied. You tried to push it aside by making some crack when I asked you if the fire was evidence.

No one can take what you post seriously when you want to play word games, resort to name calling, provide no direct answers to questions asked.

Let us see if you will answer those four questions and not edit my post.

Back to the OP
Five years and counting and no report for the dust sample Basile was going to have an independent lab (of his choosing) to test the sample. Funds were raised years ago.
 
Last edited:
mike2810 said:
Earth to camlock. In the past I have shown you lied. You try and play a word game and you got bit.

mike lies again.

What you seem to do is call people liars and use the phrase "zero evidence' in broad terms.

It fits a broad group of people, the USGOCT Zero Evidence Group, of which you are a charter member, mike.

No one can take what you post seriously when you want to play word games, resort to name calling, provide no direct answers to questions asked.
Click to expand...

Your questions are the same inane distractions you have been posing since day one. And you can't even provide any evidence for the USGOCT, the goofy conspiracy theory that is supposed to have all the answers and you USGOCT Zero Evidence folks can't even provide any answers or evidence for this gigantic USA lie.

Nanothermite says you are all raging liars.

Molten/vaporize steel says you are all raging liars.

WTC7 free fall says you are all raging liars.

Accelerating speed collapses for the twin towers says you are all raging liars.

Molten molybdenum says you are all raging liars.

Myriad other impossibilities in the USGOCT says you are all raging liars.

Your total inability to provide any evidence says you are all raging liars.
 
Last edited:
camlok said:
Your questions are the same inane distractions you have been posing since day one. And you can't even provide any evidence for the USGOCT, the goofy conspiracy theory that is supposed to have all the answers and you USGOCT Zero Evidence folks can't even provide any answers or evidence for this gigantic USA lie.

Nanothermite says you are all raging liars.

Molten/vaporize steel says you are all raging liars.

WTC7 free fall says you are all raging liars.

Accelerating speed collapses for the twin towers says you are all raging liars.

Molten molybdenum says you are all raging liars.

Myriad other impossibilities in the USGOCT says you are all raging liars.

Your total inability to provide any evidence says you are all raging liars.
Click to expand...

To assist other readers I posted the following which camlock edited:
"Earth to camlock. In the past I have shown you lied. You tried to play a word game and you got bit. ("Missile" vs. missle). remember?

So prove me wrong. I will try again and let us all see your response.
1) Was Dr. Judy Wood correct in her energy beam as the cause of the WTC 1,2, 77 collapse? Yes or No.
2) Provide your explanation for the controlled demolition of WTC 1,2,7. What was used, who did it, and how?
3) Since you keep referring to the "nanothermite" paper. Please explain how thousands of metric tons on the material NH found and stated would be needed to produce the results was placed in the building without anyone knowing?
4) Explain why Jones is now saying the termite was most likely used as a fuse to set off an explosive like C4?

What you seem to do is call people liars and use the phrase "zero evidence' in broad terms. I have shown you lied. You tried to push it aside by making some crack when I asked you if the fire was evidence.

No one can take what you post seriously when you want to play word games, resort to name calling, provide no direct answers to questions asked.

Let us see if you will answer those four questions and not edit my post.

Back to the OP
Five years and counting and no report for the dust sample Basile was going to have an independent lab (of his choosing) to test the sample. Funds were raised years ago."

He won't answer questions. He likes to edit posts to cut out parts he feels uncomfortable with.
 
Last edited:
mike2810 said:
To assist other readers I posted the following which camlock edited:
"Earth to camlock. In the past I have shown you lied. You tried to play a word game and you got bit. ("Missile" vs. missle). remember?

So prove me wrong. I will try again and let us all see your response.
1) Was Dr. Judy Wood correct in her energy beam as the cause of the WTC 1,2, 77 collapse? Yes or No.
2) Provide your explanation for the controlled demolition of WTC 1,2,7. What was used, who did it, and how?
3) Since you keep referring to the "nanothermite" paper. Please explain how thousands of metric tons on the material NH found and stated would be needed to produce the results was placed in the building without anyone knowing?
4) Explain why Jones is now saying the termite was most likely used as a fuse to set off an explosive like C4?

What you seem to do is call people liars and use the phrase "zero evidence' in broad terms. I have shown you lied. You tried to push it aside by making some crack when I asked you if the fire was evidence.

No one can take what you post seriously when you want to play word games, resort to name calling, provide no direct answers to questions asked.

Let us see if you will answer those four questions and not edit my post.

Back to the OP
Five years and counting and no report for the dust sample Basile was going to have an independent lab (of his choosing) to test the sample. Funds were raised years ago."

He won't answer questions. He likes to edit posts to cut out parts he feels uncomfortable with.
Click to expand...

If he gave any thought to answering the questions then he would cease to be a truther.
 
mike2810 said:
3) Since you keep referring to the "nanothermite" paper. Please explain how thousands of metric tons on the material NH found and stated would be needed to produce the results was placed in the building without anyone knowing?
Click to expand...

Since you USGOCT Zero Evidence folks are so grand at avoiding reality, please explain how such an august group of "science" based individuals can keep denying reality like you do.

Nine top scientists from around the world have published a peer reviewed in a scientific journal that has never been contested. They describe the nanothermite they found in WTC dust. It was in WTC dust. It had no legal/legitimate reason to be there.

The results of the use of this nanothermite are also voluminous in evidence.

And here we have a group of people who alternately deny its existence, people who have ZERO scientific qualifications to even read such a paper pretending to pass judgment on it.

Since you USGOCT Zero Evidence folks like to keep avoiding the total illegal/illegitimate presence of US government/military, non-commercially available nanothermite in WTC dust there is no need to explain how it got there.

It was there in WTC dust. It alone sinks the USGOCT.
 
zyzygy said:
If he gave any thought to answering the questions then he would cease to be a truther.
Click to expand...

You are a USGOCT conspiracy theorist/truther, zyzygy. A Zero Evidence truther.

Where did the nanothermite come from?

Where did the molten/vaporized steel come from?

Where did the iron microspheres come from?
 
camlok said:
Since you USGOCT Zero Evidence folks are so grand at avoiding reality, please explain how such an august group of "science" based individuals can keep denying reality like you do.

Nine top scientists from around the world have published a peer reviewed in a scientific journal that has never been contested. They describe the nanothermite they found in WTC dust. It was in WTC dust. It had no legal/legitimate reason to be there.

The results of the use of this nanothermite are also voluminous in evidence.

And here we have a group of people who alternately deny its existence, people who have ZERO scientific qualifications to even read such a paper pretending to pass judgment on it.

Since you USGOCT Zero Evidence folks like to keep avoiding the total illegal/illegitimate presence of US government/military, non-commercially available nanothermite in WTC dust there is no need to explain how it got there.

It was there in WTC dust. It alone sinks the USGOCT.
Click to expand...

All those words and still no answer to the questions asked.

If the "USGOCT" is sunk, then by all means provide the explanation for controlled demolition. CDOCT. (Controlled Demolition Official Conspiracy Theory).
Please tell us which one of the many is the correct one.
 
mike2810 said:
All those words and still no answer to the questions asked.
Click to expand...

Your shtick is so transparent. Your questions are inane distractions.

Since you USGOCT Zero Evidence folks like to keep avoiding the total illegal/illegitimate presence of US government/military, non-commercially available nanothermite in WTC dust there is no need to explain how it got there.

It was there in WTC dust. It alone sinks the USGOCT. It alone says there were no Arab hijackers.

It alone says that the Bush/Cheney band of war criminals are the apparent conspiracists.

Remember, mike, [though you always try to forget], George W Bush described bombs going off in the twin towers.

I think that more childish emoticons are in order for the USGOCT Zero Evidence Group.

Apparently, the USGOCT Zero Evidence Group thinks they are evidence.
 
mike2810 said:
All those words and still no answer to the questions asked.
Click to expand...

All your words, mike, and never a lick of evidence for your goofy USGOCT. You are not remotely a scientist. You all illustrate that you are all not remotely interested in science.

Back to your childish emoticons.
 
camlok said:
Your shtick is so transparent. Your questions are inane distractions.

Since you USGOCT Zero Evidence folks like to keep avoiding the total illegal/illegitimate presence of US government/military, non-commercially available nanothermite in WTC dust there is no need to explain how it got there.

It was there in WTC dust. It alone sinks the USGOCT. It alone says there were no Arab hijackers.

It alone says that the Bush/Cheney band of war criminals are the apparent conspiracists.

Remember, mike, [though you always try to forget], George W Bush described bombs going off in the twin towers.

I think that more childish emoticons are in order for the USGOCT Zero Evidence Group.

Apparently, the USGOCT Zero Evidence Group thinks they are evidence.
Click to expand...

Still no answers to questions asked.

You can do it cam. I will repeat the easy one for you.

Was Dr. Judy Wood correct in saying an energy beam weapon was used to destroy the towers? Yes or No.
 
camlok said:
All your words, mike, and never a lick of evidence for your goofy USGOCT. You are not remotely a scientist. You all illustrate that you are all not remotely interested in science.

Back to your childish emoticons.
Click to expand...


This thread is about Mark Basile's dust study. It is part of the CDOCT.
Your post is a diversion. Try to keep on topic.
 
mike2810 said:
Still no answers to questions asked.
Click to expand...

Still no evidence from the USGOCT Zero Evidence Club. You have a lot of gall putting forward nonsense questions when you know your whole dog and pony show is one gigantic lie.
 
mike2810 said:
This thread is about Mark Basile's dust study.
Click to expand...

Yes, the studies that have proven that there was nanothermite in WTC dust, along with the by products of these US government/military nanothermite super explosives, the ones George W Bush describes the fire fighters being "concussed" by, the ones you are ignoring, like all the irrefutable evidence against the goofy USGOCT, all that evidence the USGOCT Zero Evidence Club ignores because they are incapable of doing science and they love their lies.

The 43rd president recognizes, however, that his plight was “incomparable” to the firefighters, police officers and other responders who witnessed the tragedy firsthand.

“I had a job to do,” he says. “They had a job to do, but I didn’t see the horrific scenes they saw nor did I get concussed by the loud explosions and the bombs that went off around them.”


George W. Bush Talks Sleepless Nights After 9/11 | PEOPLE.com
Click to expand...
 
camlok said:
Still no evidence from the USGOCT Zero Evidence Club. You have a lot of gall putting forward nonsense questions when you know your whole dog and pony show is one gigantic lie.
Click to expand...

So you don't want to discuss Basile's study? Maybe it would be better to state his lack of study on the paint chips.

You have the gall to continue to avoid questions.
 
mike2810 said:
So you don't want to discuss Basile's study?
Click to expand...

Neither do you because you know diddly squat about it just as you know diddly squat about all the science of 911 or even worse, [but totally within the realm of possibility considering how easily you lie and how willing you are to slander others], you know but you are lying because you think you can protect the total garbage USGOCT.

Why are you studiously avoiding GW Bush describing the bombs he knows, as do you, that went off in the twin towers?

Mark Basile, like a number of other scientists, found US government/military nanothermite in WTC dust samples and all the USGOCT Zero Evidence Club wants to do is dance around to avoid discussing that this is fatal to their goofy conspiracy theory

You have the gall to continue to avoid questions.
Click to expand...

The USGOCT Zero Evidence Club doesn't have questions, it has distractions and diversions.

Still, as always, never any evidence from any of the USGOCT Zero Evidence Club.
 
camlok said:
Neither do you because you know diddly squat about it just as you know diddly squat about all the science of 911 or even worse, [but totally within the realm of possibility considering how easily you lie and how willing you are to slander others], you know but you are lying because you think you can protect the total garbage USGOCT.

Why are you studiously avoiding GW Bush describing the bombs he knows, as do you, that went off in the twin towers?

Mark Basile, like a number of other scientists, found US government/military nanothermite in WTC dust samples and all the USGOCT Zero Evidence Club wants to do is dance around to avoid discussing that this is fatal to their goofy conspiracy theory



The USGOCT Zero Evidence Club doesn't have questions, it has distractions and diversions.

Still, as always, never any evidence from any of the USGOCT Zero Evidence Club.
Click to expand...

So you still have the gall to avoid answering the questions I have asked

I do want to discuss it. I wonder why it has taken him so many years after he received the funds he requested to send the samples off to a "independent lab".

Why do you believe it has taken so long?

Provide a link to the CD theory you accept. Seems you won't say that Dr. Wood was correct or wrong.

CDOCT supporters do not like to answer questions.
 
mike2810 said:
So you still have the gall to avoid answering the questions I have asked

I do want to discuss it. I wonder why it has taken him so many years after he received the funds he requested to send the samples off to a "independent lab".

Then let's discuss it, mike.

1. Mark Basile found nanothermite, a new SOLELY US government/military super-explosive in WTC dust. Correct?

2. It has/had no legal or legitimate reason for being there. Correct?

3. Its presence, along with the volume of nanothermite by products tells us that nanothermite was used to destroy WTC steel. Correct?


Why do you believe it has taken so long?

I have no idea, like you, but why would you focus on such a picayune notion? Nanothermite means NO ARAB HIJACKERS!

CDOCT supporters do not like to answer questions.
Click to expand...

There are three major, vitally important questions for you to answer, above. I've numbered them for you.
 
camlok said:
There are three major, vitally important questions for you to answer, above. I've numbered them for you.
Click to expand...

Why do you believe it has taken so long?

Provide a link to the CD theory you accept. Seems you won't say that Dr. Wood was correct or wrong.

1. No
2. N/A
3. N/A

Your editing of my posts shows you are scared and clueless to discuss the issues.
Answer the questions I have asked or you can go blow smoke.
 
Last edited:
mike2810 said:
Answer the questions I have asked or you can go blow smoke.
Click to expand...

Typical deception from the USGOCT Zero Evidence Club.

Be honest for once, mike. You know the USGOCT has zero evidence to support it so this is why you continue with your song and dance routine pretending you are some honest, let's get to truth observer.

Your distractions and diversion routines are so old and tired. But yet you stick with them, pretending they, and you, should be taken seriously.

The USGOCT Zero Evidence Club is a joke, a huge joke.
 
camlok said:
Typical deception from the USGOCT Zero Evidence Club.

Be honest for once, mike. You know the USGOCT has zero evidence to support it so this is why you continue with your song and dance routine pretending you are some honest, let's get to truth observer.

Your distractions and diversion routines are so old and tired. But yet you stick with them, pretending they, and you, should be taken seriously.

The USGOCT Zero Evidence Club is a joke, a huge joke.
Click to expand...

How about answering questions for once, camlock

Typical non answer from the CDOCT club. The evidence they CDOCT club provides is based on pseudo science at best.

You don't even acknowledge I answered your questions. Too bad you failed to return the same curtesy.

1. NO
2 N/A because of answer 1
3 N/A because of answer 1
 
mike2810 said:
How about answering questions for once, camlock

The evidence they[sic] CDOCT club provides ...

You don't even acknowledge I answered your questions. Too bad you failed to return the same curtesy[sic].
Click to expand...

I knew that you couldn't be honest, mike. Yours aren't questions, as I have pointed out numerous times. They are distractions and diversions. The USGOCT Zero Evidence Club are a bunch of science denying, reality denying, language incompetent know nothings/misleaders/fabricators.

Your USGOCT is sunk, just as the nonsense of the USGOCT Zero Evidence Club is.
 
camlok said:
I knew that you couldn't be honest, mike. Yours aren't questions, as I have pointed out numerous times. They are distractions and diversions. The USGOCT Zero Evidence Club are a bunch of science denying, reality denying, language incompetent know nothings/misleaders/fabricators.

Your USGOCT is sunk, just as the nonsense of the USGOCT Zero Evidence Club is.
Click to expand...
.
Yep. The CDOCT is dying fast. So many years to package up a dust sample to send to a lab for analysis. Seems a simple task. One could speculate Mark got the analysis done years ago. The answer is not what he was looking for. No need to tell the world that the dust contains no military grade nanothermite.

Interesting cam, even in a thread that focuses on the study of the wtc dust, you keep harping USGOCT and won't discuss the topic. Much like Mark B., you just keep kicking the can down the road. Avoidance is your mantra.

As far as Harrit claim

"
On July 27, 2011, Niels Harrit ​
​
(chief author of the 2009 nanothermite paper)presented a calculation for how much thermitic material would have been necessary to explain the presence of the many tiny iron-rich spheres in the dust (assuming that a thermite reaction was the source of the spheres). He gave a range of numbers, based on lower and higher concentrations of the thermite formulation. His lowest figure amounted to 29,000 metric tons of thermitic explosive ​
per tower'
JAMES FETZER: Aug 26, 2011

911 Mystery Solved - Nano-thermite discovered in WTC remains
 
Last edited:
mike2810 said:
.
911 Mystery Solved - Nano-thermite discovered in WTC remains[/url]
Click to expand...

It takes a special kind of thick to not grasp that nanothermite, ONLY US government/US military, being in the dust of WTC means that the entire US government nonsense was one gigantic lie after another. But you seem content with your governments murdering people, mike, so have at 'er.

But you have known this for a good long time, mike, and still you try to provide cover for such deep evil. Totally despicable.
 
camlok said:
It takes a special kind of thick to not grasp that nanothermite, ONLY US government/US military, being in the dust of WTC means that the entire US government nonsense was one gigantic lie after another. But you seem content with your governments murdering people, mike, so have at 'er.

But you have known this for a good long time, mike, and still you try to provide cover for such deep evil. Totally despicable.
Click to expand...

Name calling again, cam? It is you have been tricked and do not understand the science.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom