• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Magapill.com - Trump's new favorite website

Kobie said:
To those of us with actual brains, of course it's "concerning."

To those here at DP who fellate Trump at every turn, it's business as usual. We truly live in a post-truth society.

Trump supporters are idiots. All of them.
Click to expand...

I think we could be more even handed about the idiocies.
 
Jesse Booth said:
I keep getting my gigantic mounds of viagra powder and cocaine mixed up. I hate it when I snort a line and instead of getting high, my nose swells up and turns beet red.
Click to expand...

Must look cute above those rosebud lips.
 
ecofarm said:
I can't believe anyone could take the website seriously. That's laughable.

It's obvious the Weekly Standard does not need to invent tweets, including graphics, to discredit the website. That could ruin the WS - for no reason! As I noted, you're free to verify those tweets if you find them unlikely.

I don't find it necessary to spend time proving every nutbag website is garbage.
Click to expand...

And this here is the problem with people today. They think that everything that they are told by sites that they approve of is correct and completely true. They feel that it is a waste of time to verify what is told them. The old saying "Trust, but verify" has fallen to the wayside for partisan politics. You don't have to take any website seriously. But the onus is on you for verifying what is and is not true. Not anyone else's.
 
Kal'Stang said:
And this here is the problem with people today. They think that everything that they are told by sites that they approve of is correct and completely true. They feel that it is a waste of time to verify what is told them. The old saying "Trust, but verify" has fallen to the wayside for partisan politics. You don't have to take any website seriously. But the onus is on you for verifying what is and is not true. Not anyone else's.
Click to expand...

Idiocy.

1. I looked at the website, it's so absurd it could be a Poe.
2. Does the WS have any reason to lie? No.
3. Is the WS reputation better than the joke website? Yes.
4. Would inventing tweets, including graphics, hurt the WS reputation? Yes.

For those reasons and more I choose to accept the WS claim.

See? Reasonable and rational people don't need to verify every claim about a dumbass website. It's a stupid website and only hardcore political hack fanboys could care.


So, I don't give a crap about your stupid generalizations and dumbass defense of garbage. It's pathetic. Good day.
 
ecofarm said:
Idiocy.

1. I looked at the website, it's so absurd it could be a Poe.
2. Does the WS have any reason to lie? No.
3. Is the WS reputation better than the joke website? Yes.
4. Would inventing tweets, including graphics, hurt the WS reputation? Yes.

For those reasons and more I choose to accept the WS claim.

See? Reasonable and rational people don't need to verify every claim about a dumbass website. It's a stupid website and only hardcore political hack fanboys could care.


So, I don't give a crap about your stupid generalizations and pathetic defense of garbage. It's pathetic. Good day.
Click to expand...

If you looked at the website then you can provide links to what you think is CT. Simple eh? Why haven't you?

Oh, that's right...you would prefer to believe what you are told instead of verifying for yourself what you are told. Come on eco, you're supposed to be better at arguing than this.
 
Kal'Stang said:
If you looked at the website then you can provide links to what you think is CT. Simple eh? Why haven't you?

Oh, that's right...you would prefer to believe what you are told instead of verifying for yourself what you are told. Come on eco, you're supposed to be better at arguing than this.
Click to expand...

You're acting like a Truther and pretending the current website is the only evidence. Pathetic. Good day.
 
Page 4 and no one has given a single link from the magapill site that is CT. I've already checked the top links and verified them as appearing to be true. Even gave the links to the sites that are from trusted sources such as LA Times and CNBC and even a .gov website. Yet no one here can provide a single CT link that originates from the magapill site? Hmm.....
 
ecofarm said:
You're acting like a Truther and pretending the current website is the only evidence. Pathetic. Good day.
Click to expand...

Night time here. ;)

If you want to continue thinking its a CT site then by all means go for it. But since you have yet to provide any actual proof that the site is CT I'll simply have to dismiss your "arguments".
 
Kal'Stang said:
Page 4 and no one has given a single link from the magapill site that is CT. I've already checked the top links and verified them as appearing to be true. Even gave the links to the sites that are from trusted sources such as LA Times and CNBC and even a .gov website. Yet no one here can provide a single CT link that originates from the magapill site? Hmm.....
Click to expand...

The tweet is real.

https://twitter.com/MAGAPILL/status/931987385860198400

"I'm woke. Follow me."


Satisfied?
 
Kal'Stang said:
That's on twitter. What CT is there on the website itself? You know...the one that Trump tweeted about? We don't even know if the twitter account actually belongs to the site owner. All those Russian fake accounts and all ya know. ;)
Click to expand...

Pathetic.
 
Superfly said:
I haven't gone over every single article, but I will. My tolerance for hogwash is slender, and from what I've seen so far, it's a lot of hogwash.

A few that did jump out at me, though, was where it mentioned in June that 238 child molesters were captured, and also how Jeff Sessions declared fight against elite pedophiles. :lol: You could cut the irony with a knife.

I glanced at a few articles, as I said, and when I opened the article, it looked like Trump was taking credit for a lot of things that he simply should not be taking credit for. Just because an arrest was made while he was President doesn't mean he is responsible, and gets the credit, for the arrest. :lol:

But as I said, I will spend some time, going through each of these articles and hope that they are better than the ones I've opened thus far. I'm not holding out much hope, though.
Click to expand...


May I use the bolded for a signature?
 
ecofarm said:
Pathetic.
Click to expand...

:shrug: Trump tweeted about the website. Not twitter. Is that correct or false? Who is using twitter as evidence that the info found at the website is fake? Not Trump. But another news site. Without even knowing if the two are owned/ran by the same people. And without verifying the info at the site itself which is what Trump tweeted about. Or are you going to deny that there are fake accounts now despite the Russian's?
 
Jesse Booth said:
I keep getting my gigantic mounds of viagra powder and cocaine mixed up. I hate it when I snort a line and instead of getting high, my nose swells up and turns beet red.
Click to expand...

:lamo
 
Kal'Stang said:
Page 4 and no one has given a single link from the magapill site that is CT. I've already checked the top links and verified them as appearing to be true. Even gave the links to the sites that are from trusted sources such as LA Times and CNBC and even a .gov website. Yet no one here can provide a single CT link that originates from the magapill site? Hmm.....
Click to expand...

And they won't. Anything to pile on the Hate Trump Train. It's amusing that there is enough out there to be critical of, but when it's actually somewhat good....crickets.
Just because a site that might be known for CT reports something, doesn't make the 'something' untrue.
But it's a good effort guys. :congrats:
 
holbritter said:
And they won't. Anything to pile on the Hate Trump Train. It's amusing that there is enough out there to be critical of, but when it's actually somewhat good....crickets.
Just because a site that might be known for CT reports something, doesn't make the 'something' untrue.
But it's a good effort guys. :congrats:
Click to expand...

This is true also. And since on the website most of the links that I saw were just links to legitimate news sources they can't really call that "CT" to begin with. Even if that twitter account is theirs it is still quite possible for the info at their website to be verified as true or false. And so far I've not seen any that were CT at the website itself.
 
I just checked the 11 links that they have for October. Here is the break down of the links:

3 were links to CNBC
1 from Yahoo News
2 from Bloomberg
1 from CNS news
1 from New York Times
1 from Fox Business
1 from Financial Times
1 from National Association of Manufacturers

Are all of those CT sites? Any of them?
 
Kal'Stang said:
I just checked the 11 links that they have for October. Here is the break down of the links:

3 were links to CNBC
1 from Yahoo News
2 from Bloomberg
1 from CNS news
1 from New York Times
1 from Fox Business
1 from Financial Times
1 from National Association of Manufacturers

Are all of those CT sites? Any of them?
Click to expand...

A good CT site will never link to CT sites to back itself up.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom