• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Second shooter arrested?? [W:37]

Lord Tammerlain said:
The question being why stage I? What was the goal
Click to expand...

Excellent question, but I can only guess.

Terror for its own sake? Gun control? Training exercise gone wrong?

Perhaps it will become apparent in the months ahead.
 
Thoreau72 said:
If I may tell you one short little story regarding this "second shooter" business that seems to threaten you so.

My little town is less than 2 hours from The Pulse in Orlando, which I found out from an Orlando resident last week is going to be turned into some sort of memorial museum. He and I, total strangers spending a few hours together waiting for passengers, had a good laugh about that.

The friend of a young friend of mine, 20 something, was in the Pulse when it all happened. She visited that night club on several occasions. Friend of a friend who I've known for 5 years, and honest and hard working young lady.

She was unharmed that evening, but like most young people today does social media, I think Facebook in this case. That night she observed 2 shooters blazing away. She did not photograph it, but got out of the place. She commented to her friends on Facebook, including my friend, about the 2 shooters and her good luck in being unharmed.

About a day or so later, her comments on the social media had been removed.

Why do you suppose her comments regarding a second shooter were removed, and by whom?
Click to expand...

Listen no offense but turn off your computer and get outside to enjoy nature. You are just rambling making no sense what so ever.

One last time: "I want to emphasize Paddock is solely responsible for this heinous act. We are aware of the rumors outside of the media and also on social media that there was more than one assailant," said Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Undersheriff Kevin McMahill said.

He said, there was no evidence to support the theory of another shooter.


Las Vegas police debunk second shooter rumor - Story | KLAS-TV
 
Thoreau72 said:
Indeed, maybe a third shooter. Maybe not here, but I've already mentioned that. Maybe a fourth shooter too. I don't know and neither does Adams. Our minds are open, yours is apparently tightly closed. You and the media see only one shooter. Blinders will do that, or a closed mind.

Same comment to you Mike, why does one need expert status to solve problems with high school physics? How does a time and distance problem worked backward require expert status?

And if you don't mind, why do you and CS appear so threatened by the mere notion of a second or third shooter?
Click to expand...

You missed the point. Adams analysis you are so supportive of does not indicate the shooter in the crowd.

Expert? Adams admits he is no expert. You didn't read the article I posted earlier did you? It answers the question you have regarding Adams analysis and data used.

I am not threatened by what Adams has done.

Seems some accept fake news and others don't. Has there ever been a recent mass shooting you didn't believe the govt did it, it was a false flag, etc?
 
Last edited:
mike2810 said:
You missed the point. Adams analysis you are so supportive of does not indicate the shooter in the crowd.

Expert? Adams admits he is no expert. You didn't read the article I posted earlier did you? It answers the question you have regarding Adams analysis and data used.

I am not threatened by what Adams has done.

Seems some accept fake news and others don't. Has there ever been a recent mass shooting you didn't believe the govt did it, it was a false flag, etc?
Click to expand...

You and CS have revealed much by your refusal to offer any explanation at all as to why you are so fearful of the mere idea of there being more than one shooter, even though several witnesses to include police officers have mentioned it.

Sherlock Holmes you are not. "Elementary my dear Watson" has no place in your "analytical processes." Thank you both. :lol:
 
Thoreau72 said:
You and CS have revealed much by your refusal to offer any explanation at all as to why you are so fearful of the mere idea of there being more than one shooter, even though several witnesses to include police officers have mentioned it.

Sherlock Holmes you are not. "Elementary my dear Watson" has no place in your "analytical processes." Thank you both. :lol:
Click to expand...

False claim on your part.

Why you so afraid that the possibility is that only one shooter did the shooting.?

T72, prove that there was not 10 shooters at LV?

Unlike you, I will wait for the investigation to finish.
 
Thoreau72 said:
You and CS have revealed much by your refusal to offer any explanation at all as to why you are so fearful of the mere idea of there being more than one shooter, even though several witnesses to include police officers have mentioned it.

Sherlock Holmes you are not. "Elementary my dear Watson" has no place in your "analytical processes." Thank you both. :lol:
Click to expand...

Not accepting the word of someone who has no real knowledge about the topic they are talking about doesn't show fear it shows logical thinking and intelligence. Believing the word of someone who they themselves admits they have no training on the topic simply because they support your hatred of the US is the complete lack of critical thinking. But that is what we have come to expect from you.
 
mike2810 said:
False claim on your part.

Why you so afraid that the possibility is that only one shooter did the shooting.?

T72, prove that there was not 10 shooters at LV?

Unlike you, I will wait for the investigation to finish.
Click to expand...

I am not afraid of there being only one shooter. I do not give a GGD about how many shooters there were 3 weeks ago. I'm interested only in where the facts take the analysis and investigation.

So far, many of the facts (witness testimony including cops) an absence of the correct amount of brass in the hotel room, and Adams analysis all say more than one shooter.

A friend of mine lives there and just drove by the scene yesterday and said it's all still roped off. Slow investigators it seems, but maybe they are following Adams' lead and still keeping it hushed up.

It's interesting how the lone gunman theme is common between Pulse and Vegas, and in each case has been disproved, even as the authorities stick to the official story.

You wait for the investigation to finish, but you're not going to allow scientific analysis by men like Adams to get in your way. :lamo
 
Thoreau72 said:
I am not afraid of there being only one shooter. I do not give a GGD about how many shooters there were 3 weeks ago. I'm interested only in where the facts take the analysis and investigation.
Click to expand...

:lamo
 
11 pages debating a totally fabricated story. The writers who invented the story probably didn't spend as much time on it as the posters on DP have done. That's just pathetic.
 
Dittohead not! said:
11 pages debating a totally fabricated story. The writers who invented the story probably didn't spend as much time on it as the posters on DP have done. That's just pathetic.
Click to expand...

Sometimes whack a mole can be entertaining
 
Thoreau72 said:
I am not afraid of there being only one shooter. I do not give a GGD about how many shooters there were 3 weeks ago. I'm interested only in where the facts take the analysis and investigation.

So far, many of the facts (witness testimony including cops) an absence of the correct amount of brass in the hotel room, and Adams analysis all say more than one shooter.

A friend of mine lives there and just drove by the scene yesterday and said it's all still roped off. Slow investigators it seems, but maybe they are following Adams' lead and still keeping it hushed up.

It's interesting how the lone gunman theme is common between Pulse and Vegas, and in each case has been disproved, even as the authorities stick to the official story.

You wait for the investigation to finish, but you're not going to allow scientific analysis by men like Adams to get in your way. :lamo
Click to expand...

Funny.
If it was so scientific and solid analysis , makes me wonder why only posting on the net and waiting for law enforcement to contact him

We know why, do you?
 
mike2810 said:
Funny.
If it was so scientific and solid analysis , makes me wonder why only posting on the net and waiting for law enforcement to contact him

We know why, do you?
Click to expand...

All you know Mike, is what the government tells you.
 
Thoreau72 said:
All you know Mike, is what the government tells you.
Click to expand...

Such BS. It seems at times I am more familiar with the sources you use than you are.:mrgreen:

So you have no questions regarding Adams analysis? Like ruling out echo, location of the recording vid, was the mic pointing towards the shooter location or away, etc.

But, hey, you seem to accept any analysis that feeds your govt is bad rants.
 
mike2810 said:
But, hey, you seem to accept any analysis that feeds your govt is bad rants.
Click to expand...

That's hilarious, mike, you, of all people, pointing fingers.

Successive US governments have provided myriad proof that they are among the most evil people on the planet.

People who support this level of evil aren't far behind.
 
mike2810 said:
Such BS. It seems at times I am more familiar with the sources you use than you are.:mrgreen:
Click to expand...

And yet, you never seem able to explain anything.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom