• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Was Flight 93 Shot Down?

Irwin Corey said:
What is a truther and why to you call them names if your cause is so just? IF YOU were open minded would you be compelled to fight to the death over this and denigrate other AmeriCANs; pathetic.

You win, I'm gone!
Click to expand...

Do you give any credence to the no-planes, drones, holograms, energy beam weapons , mini-nukes or cd truther theories?
 
Irwin Corey said:
Your sig fits you to a T.



So are you a "truther" with your unrelenting truth doctrine? I'm not blaming anyone for 911, I just don't believe YOUR truth is ALL the truth. Hence MY statement: "I don't know what happened 911-01, few people do. I watched happen in real time, I've viewed the "debunker" videos and the, what was it, short change type videos. IMHO opinion both sides have credible experts. But what "I" saw doesn't match up with what I was told, so "I" don't believe, for what ever reason - and I don't care, that the full truth is known. <-period.

Don't worry about my ass and doors, look after yourself. :2wave:
Click to expand...

You no evidence to back up your claims, you deny the actual evidence that is there
Ill ask again
Where did you get the idea that the buildings fell into thjeir own footprint?
Why do you think there is no evidence of a plane crash at Shanksville or the Pentagon?
Why would you expect a plane exploding in mid air would look like a plane slamming into the ground intact?
I am actually curious as to where and how you got the opinions that led you to your conclusions
 
Quag said:
You no evidence to back up your claims, you deny the actual evidence that is there
Ill ask again
Where did you get the idea that the buildings fell into thjeir own footprint?
Why do you think there is no evidence of a plane crash at Shanksville or the Pentagon?
Why would you expect a plane exploding in mid air would look like a plane slamming into the ground intact?
I am actually curious as to where and how you got the opinions that led you to your conclusions
Click to expand...

He doesn't seem willing to address those points, he seems content with believing truther myths such as the buildings fell into their own footprints.
 
Quag said:
You no evidence to back up your claims, you deny the actual evidence that is there
Ill ask again
Where did you get the idea that the buildings fell into thjeir own footprint?
Why do you think there is no evidence of a plane crash at Shanksville or the Pentagon?
Why would you expect a plane exploding in mid air would look like a plane slamming into the ground intact?
I am actually curious as to where and how you got the opinions that led you to your conclusions
Click to expand...

why would you bother to ask?
 
Quag said:
No it was a coroner and that ISNT what he said but then truthers take a comment out of context and often change the comment to try and pretend it somehow supports their fantasy
Click to expand...

Another zero evidence post just like all the other zero evidence posts.
 
zyzygy said:
Like all your posts. You have no evidence. Why are you here?
Click to expand...
I would suggest ignore his posts. I gave him a chance on another thread to show that his statements were correct. He has yet to reply. The reason is pretty clear.
 
zyzygy said:
Like all your posts. You have no evidence. Why are you here?
Click to expand...

You metabunkers are the ones with no evidence. The 3000 plus A & Es have plenty of evidence. It is now being studied by a grand jury, as you well know. The chance of you metabunkers getting a grand jury is zilch. Why? Because not a one of you has ever provided any evidence to show the US gov story has any validity.

Show some actual evidence. You know you can't.
 
mike2810 said:
I would suggest ignore his posts. I gave him a chance on another thread to show that his statements were correct. He has yet to reply. The reason is pretty clear.
Click to expand...

I find his non-answers to be highly amusing.
 
ralphcdp said:
You metabunkers are the ones with no evidence. The 3000 plus A & Es have plenty of evidence. It is now being studied by a grand jury, as you well know. The chance of you metabunkers getting a grand jury is zilch. Why? Because not a one of you has ever provided any evidence to show the US gov story has any validity.

Show some actual evidence. You know you can't.
Click to expand...

What is being studied? Details please. I bet that nothing is being studied.
 
zyzygy said:
I bet that nothing is being studied.
Click to expand...

The usual, totally uniformed metabunker position. You can bet the farm if you so desire. Your opinions mean zilch.
 
ralphcdp said:
The usual, totally uniformed metabunker position. You can bet the farm if you so desire. Your opinions mean zilch.
Click to expand...

Prove that it is being studied. Link, please. Without evidence your opinions are zilch.
 
mike2810 said:
I would suggest ignore his posts. I gave him a chance on another thread to show that his statements were correct. He has yet to reply. The reason is pretty clear.
Click to expand...

His posts are rather repetitive and compeltely without value
 
zyzygy said:
Prove that it is being studied. Link, please. Without evidence your opinions are zilch.
Click to expand...

You have been given the links. Unsurprising that you don't know how to use them. All metabunkers have is misdirection. Have you found any CCTV photos of "hijackers" from CCTV cameras at airports on 9/11?
 
mike2810 said:
I would suggest ignore his posts. I gave him a chance on another thread to show that his statements were correct. He has yet to reply. The reason is pretty clear.
Click to expand...

So where is your evidence? Come on, you must have a metabunker's membership card.
 
Quag said:
His posts are rather repetitive and compeltely without value
Click to expand...

Agreed. Still waiting for his explanation of what happened to flight 93 and questions asked in other threads. Till he responds I will not take his bait. Pretty pathetic.

After all these years and the best that they can come up with is well the official report is wrong and there is no evidence. Maybe he believes Flight 93 is still flying around.:lamo

Search Results: "United Airlines Flight 93 Hijacking Incident, 2001" -
Prints & Photographs Online Catalog (Library of Congress).

Government Releases Detailed Information on 9/11 Crashes

https://www.ntsb.gov/about/Documents/UAL93FDR.pdf
 
Last edited:
mike2810 said:
Agreed.
Click to expand...

Absolutely pathetic. metabunkers quote the guys who did 9/11 as their "evidence". "evidence" means huge data dumps of things the metabunkers know nothing about.
 
mike2810 said:
T ...
Click to expand...


The metabunkers, little mick wests all, are flummoxed by the new grand jury which will totally destroy their delusional little worlds.

Just how deeply evil are those who try to provide cover for the US official who murdered 3,000 of their own. It takes a special kind of perversity to provide cover, oh so lamely, when these metabunkers all know the US governments' story is impossible.
 
ralphcdp said:
The metabunkers, little mick wests all, are flummoxed by the new grand jury which will totally destroy their delusional little worlds.

Just how deeply evil are those who try to provide cover for the US official who murdered 3,000 of their own. It takes a special kind of perversity to provide cover, oh so lamely, when these metabunkers all know the US governments' story is impossible.
Click to expand...

Bollocks. Nothing will happen. Why is the story impossible? You still have to tell us why.
 
Why were no bodies, baggage or aircraft parts visible in Shanksville, yet so obvious in the Ethiopian crash? Hmm
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom