• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Building 7 . . .

Re: High School Teacher BUTCHERS NIST WTC 7 Report

Your attempts to illustrate yourself as a knowledgeable, informed person are so lame, mike.

Perhaps when you learn how to spell, when you learn how to properly quote a source, when you can provide one speck of evidence for the nutty conspiracy theory you support, we can chat.

Your sole purpose is one of distraction. Show NIST's proof that the molten iron flowing out of WTC2 was aluminum.
Why does NIST state that a yellow stream of molten metal seen in some photographs pouring down the side of WTC2 was aluminum from the crashed plane, even though aluminum burns with a white glow?
NIST reported (NIST NCSTAR 1-5A) that just before 9:52 a.m., a bright spot appeared at the top of a window on the 80th floor of WTC 2, four windows removed from the east edge on the north face, followed by the flow of a glowing liquid. This flow lasted approximately four seconds before subsiding. Many such liquid flows were observed from near this location in the seven minutes leading up to the collapse of this tower. There is no evidence of similar molten liquid pouring out from another location in WTC 2 or from anywhere within WTC 1.
Photographs, as well as NIST simulations of the aircraft impact, show large piles of debris in the 80th and 81st floors of WTC 2 near the site where the glowing liquid eventually appeared. Much of this debris came from the aircraft itself and from the office furnishings that the aircraft pushed forward as it tunneled to this far end of the building. Large fires developed on these piles shortly after the aircraft impact and continued to burn in the area until the tower collapsed.
NIST concluded that the source of the molten material was aluminum alloys from the aircraft, since these are known to melt between 475 degrees Celsius (900 degrees Fahrenheit) and 640 degrees Celsius (1,200 degrees Fahrenheit)—depending on the particular alloy—well below the expected temperatures (about 1,000 degrees Celsius or 1,800 degrees Fahrenheit) in the vicinity of the fires. Aluminum is not expected to ignite at normal fire temperatures and there is no visual indication that the material flowing from the tower was burning.
Pure liquid aluminum would be expected to appear silvery. However, the molten metal was very likely mixed with large amounts of hot, partially burned, solid organic materials (e.g., furniture, carpets, partitions and computers) which can display an orange glow, much like logs burning in a fireplace. The apparent color also would have been affected by slag formation on the surface.

https://www.nist.gov/el/faqs-nist-wtc-towers-investigation

Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition - Molten Steel
 
Re: High School Teacher BUTCHERS NIST WTC 7 Report

How come you are terrified to answer that?

You can hurl insults, but what are your qualifications to prove your crazy conspiracy theories?

I'm guessing the answer is: NONE....:lamo

Ding ding ding we have a winner
 
Re: High School Teacher BUTCHERS NIST WTC 7 Report

. No hijackers? Where is the evidence of that? .

It's your nutty, wacked out conspiracy theory, zyzygy that says there were hijackers. You provide the evidence.
 
Re: High School Teacher BUTCHERS NIST WTC 7 Report

Do you know of a way that huge buildings can be prepped for cd without anyone noticing? I can't think of a way and our truthers are avoiding the question.

They avoid all questions because they have no answers just silly claims based on very poor understanding of physics and reality
 
Re: High School Teacher BUTCHERS NIST WTC 7 Report

It's your nutty, wacked out conspiracy theory, zyzygy that says there were hijackers. You provide the evidence.

What are your scientific qualifications?
 
Re: High School Teacher BUTCHERS NIST WTC 7 Report

Ding ding ding we have a winner

Nope, another loser USGOCT supporter with his "evidence".

Jesus, you folks have zippo, which of course you all already know.

Why such a strong predilection for lies and liars?
 
Re: High School Teacher BUTCHERS NIST WTC 7 Report

They avoid all questions because they have no answers just silly claims based on very poor understanding of physics and reality

By being a CT they think they are in the cool group of people with secret knowledge, but they are really just in an unending fap-fest of wank.
 
Re: High School Teacher BUTCHERS NIST WTC 7 Report

Pure liquid aluminum would be expected to appear silvery. However, the molten metal was very likely mixed with large amounts of hot, partially burned, solid organic materials (e.g., furniture, carpets, partitions and computers) which can display an orange glow, much like logs burning in a fireplace. The apparent color also would have been affected by slag formation on the surface.

Thanks for confirming that you actually do know nothing, zyzygy. NIST never performed any experiments to prove their lame theory because they knew it was completely lame.

This, from you, all you have ever offered, is such old crap, totally false crap.

It was molten iron which means there were no hijackers.

Why haven't any of you "scientists" discussed the fact that not a single piece of aircraft parts, of some 4 million, have ever been IDed as coming from the USGOCT's contention of the 4 planes?
 
Re: High School Teacher BUTCHERS NIST WTC 7 Report

Thanks for confirming that you actually do know nothing, zyzygy. NIST never performed any experiments to prove their lame theory because they knew it was completely lame.

This, from you, all you have ever offered, is such old crap, totally false crap.

It was molten iron which means there were no hijackers.

Why haven't any of you "scientists" discussed the fact that not a single piece of aircraft parts, of some 4 million, have ever been IDed as coming from the USGOCT's contention of the 4 planes?

What is your scientific background?
 
Re: High School Teacher BUTCHERS NIST WTC 7 Report

By being a CT they think they are in the cool group of people with secret knowledge, but they are really just in an unending fap-fest of wank.

Still zero evidence, bh. Maybe someone could explain that word to you.
 
Re: High School Teacher BUTCHERS NIST WTC 7 Report

It's your nutty, wacked out conspiracy theory, zyzygy that says there were hijackers. You provide the evidence.

So you didn't read the links I posted about the molten aluminium. You truthers are all cowards.
 
Re: High School Teacher BUTCHERS NIST WTC 7 Report

What is your scientific background?

Even you, one of the zero evidence club members, know that the following is totally impossible.

Why haven't any of you "scientists" discussed the fact that not a single piece of aircraft parts, of some 4 million, have ever been IDed as coming from the USGOCT's contention of the 4 planes?
 
Re: High School Teacher BUTCHERS NIST WTC 7 Report

Nope, another loser USGOCT supporter with his "evidence".

Jesus, you folks have zippo, which of course you all already know.

Why such a strong predilection for lies and liars?

How were the buildings prepped for cd without anyone noticing?
 
Re: High School Teacher BUTCHERS NIST WTC 7 Report

Still zero evidence, bh. Maybe someone could explain that word to you.

How did they plant the CD without anyone noticing?
 
Re: High School Teacher BUTCHERS NIST WTC 7 Report

Still zero evidence, bh. Maybe someone could explain that word to you.

Read the links we post. All the evidence is there. You do need a bit of scientific knowledge to understand them. That could be the root of your problem.
 
Re: High School Teacher BUTCHERS NIST WTC 7 Report

So you didn't read the links I posted about the molten aluminium. You truthers are all cowards.

I have read it many times, zyzygy, and I read it over again. It's totally bogus. NIST was lying and they knew they were lying and you know you were advancing those lies. With no shame whatsoever. Shame on you.

Why haven't any of you "scientists" discussed the fact that not a single piece of aircraft parts, of some 4 million, have ever been IDed as coming from the USGOCT's contention of the 4 planes?

You know the above makes the USGOCT bogus. Why do you keep supporting such obvious lies and liars?

With no shame whatsoever. Shame on you.
 
Re: High School Teacher BUTCHERS NIST WTC 7 Report

Even you, one of the zero evidence club members, know that the following is totally impossible.

Why haven't any of you "scientists" discussed the fact that not a single piece of aircraft parts, of some 4 million, have ever been IDed as coming from the USGOCT's contention of the 4 planes?

Been done many times by people that are actual scientists.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/

You could learn a lot if you were willing to accept evidence instead of fanatically believing every crackpot conspiracy theory.

What is your scientific background?
 
Re: High School Teacher BUTCHERS NIST WTC 7 Report

Read the links we post. .

The ones that none of you dare to discuss because you know that they are total garbage. And still you put out the lies with no shame. Shame on you.
 
Re: High School Teacher BUTCHERS NIST WTC 7 Report

Thanks for confirming that you actually do know nothing, zyzygy. NIST never performed any experiments to prove their lame theory because they knew it was completely lame.

This, from you, all you have ever offered, is such old crap, totally false crap.

It was molten iron which means there were no hijackers.

Why haven't any of you "scientists" discussed the fact that not a single piece of aircraft parts, of some 4 million, have ever been IDed as coming from the USGOCT's contention of the 4 planes?

Sigh. This is like shooting fish in a barrel.

9-11 Research: Aircraft Remains
 
Re: High School Teacher BUTCHERS NIST WTC 7 Report

The ones that none of you dare to discuss because you know that they are total garbage. And still you put out the lies with no shame. Shame on you.

Prove that they are garbage. You saying that is not evidence. Can you understand that? How were the buildings prepped for cd without anyone noticing? Do you have any idea about what it takes to prep a huge building? Why won't you answer the questions?
 
Re: High School Teacher BUTCHERS NIST WTC 7 Report

Popular Mechanics, jeebeez kerist you obviously know much less than your evidence empty posts illustrate.

Your posts are vacuous. How were the buildings prepped for cd without anyone noticing?
 
Back
Top Bottom