• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Saudi Arabia government ‘funded dry run' for 9/11, legal documents claim[W:14]

Re: Saudi Arabia government ‘funded dry run' for 9/11, legal documents claim

what does hypocrisy have to do with a debate?

you believe in dragons; I don't ............. where is the hypocrisy in that debate?

You trying to use YouTube videos as a credible source when it's anything but is rather amusing.
 
Re: Saudi Arabia government ‘funded dry run' for 9/11, legal documents claim

You trying to use YouTube videos as a credible source when it's anything but is rather amusing.

so, according to you hypocrisy equals amusement?


lemme ask you a question:
Are you a whale? ............ I think you may be a whale because it sounds like you are spewing **** outta your blow hole .......
 
Re: Saudi Arabia government ‘funded dry run' for 9/11, legal documents claim

so, according to you hypocrisy equals amusement?


lemme ask you a question:
Are you a whale? ............ I think you may be a whale because it sounds like you are spewing **** outta your blow hole .......

Considering that **** is all that you spew.....it seems you are also a master of hypocrisy in more ways than one.
 
Re: Saudi Arabia government ‘funded dry run' for 9/11, legal documents claim

what does hypocrisy have to do with a debate?

you believe in dragons; I don't ............. where is the hypocrisy in that debate?

Don't forget Komodo Dragons. Or Imagine Dragons! ;)
 
Saudi Arabia government ‘funded dry run' for 9/11, legal documents claim




Follow the evidence no matter where it leads. Citizens of the US and the families of the deceased are entitled to know the unvarnished truth.

NOTE: Please don't inject Conspiracy Theory into this thread. There is a dedicated sub-forum for that nonsense.

Related: Saudi government allegedly funded a ‘dry run’ for 9/11

Don't post Conspiracy Theories and then add do not not inject Conspiracy Theories. In other words... don't be a hypocrite. I didn't read the article and don't care too. Whoever died in 9-11 is dead.

And if the Saudis tell you to jump then jump. Wherever they tell you to send American kids to get their eyes blown out, legs blown off, on some foreign post 99% of Americans can't point to on a map then you all do it.


"The Saudis are unfair!" Blah, blah, blah. I don't care. Maybe they can bring the light of science and art to the United States.
 
Re: Saudi Arabia government ‘funded dry run' for 9/11, legal documents claim

Moderator's Warning:
Moved to a more appropriate location.
 
Re: Saudi Arabia government ‘funded dry run' for 9/11, legal documents claim

There is a difference between a THEORY about a CONSPIRACY and CONSPIRACY THEORY which is what you normally engage in.

No, there is zero difference. This illustrates you know nothing about the English language.

A theory about Black Holes is no different than a Black Hole theory.
 
Saudi Arabia government ‘funded dry run' for 9/11, legal documents claim




Follow the evidence no matter where it leads. Citizens of the US and the families of the deceased are entitled to know the unvarnished truth.

NOTE: Please don't inject Conspiracy Theory into this thread. There is a dedicated sub-forum for that nonsense.

Well, it sure didn't take long for your conspiracy theory to be shunted to the CS section, which illustrates just how crazy this all is.

The US government can't do anything without a conspiracy being involved. Same for most every government on the planet.
 
Re: Saudi Arabia government ‘funded dry run' for 9/11, legal documents claim

YouTube videos are one of the least reliable "sources" out there.

That statement illustrates a profound ignorance. US governments are the least reliable source out there, followed by the propagandist US media, the lap dogs of US governments.

It's a vicious circle of jerking, all designed to dupe y'all, and it works very well.
 
Re: Saudi Arabia government ‘funded dry run' for 9/11, legal documents claim

That statement illustrates a profound ignorance. US governments are the least reliable source out there, followed by the propagandist US media, the lap dogs of US governments.

It's a vicious circle of jerking, all designed to dupe y'all, and it works very well.

No, the least reputable sources out there are the useless rags you believe wholeheartedly.

Ah, traditional CTer "I can't compete with facts and evidence, so I must shriek about lapdogs" bs.

Yes, you CTers do know quite a bit about circle jerking don't you.
 
Saudi Arabia government ‘funded dry run' for 9/11, legal documents claim




Follow the evidence no matter where it leads. Citizens of the US and the families of the deceased are entitled to know the unvarnished truth.

All the citizens of Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Pakistan, ... are entitled to know why y'all have once again allowed yourselves to be so royally duped into supporting the myriad war crimes, the terrorism, the slaughter of millions for the umpteenth time by your war mongering US governments.

For things that all these people had nothing to do with.

Nanothermite = no Arab hijackers

Molten steel = no Arab hijackers

Molten molybdenum = no Arab hijackers

Molten iron flowing from WTC2 = no Arab hijackers

Twin towers explosions prior to airplane strike = no Arab hijackers

Wrong engine in WTC2 tower = no Arab hijackers

Many absolute impossibilities in USGOCT story = no Arab hijackers
 
Last edited:
To understand why the US seems hell-bent on hiding any involvement of Saudi Arabia in 9/11, you have to go from back to 1945 to a meeting between Franklin Roosevelt and King Abdulaziz of Saudi Arabia.

The US needed secure Saudi Arabia oil after WWII and during the cold war era, so they approached the Saudis to take control of the worlds largest oil reserves and to prevent the USSR from doing the same. The Saudi's agreed and this gave them unparalleled wealth and security from the US providing that the US and any other western governments never interfered with their religious beliefs in Wahhabism, which is an ultra conservative, violent and fundamental interpretation of Islam that they followed.

This is why despite the numerous atrocities and treatment of its own people and even those which are happening in Yemen, the Saudi's are rarely criticised by those in power because of this agreement. It's why the 28 pages of the 9/11 commission were never released until recently and why some of it is still redacted.
 
All the citizens of Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Pakistan, ... are entitled to know why y'all have once again allowed yourselves to be so royally duped into supporting the myriad war crimes, the terrorism, the slaughter of millions for the umpteenth time by your war mongering US governments.

For things that all these people had nothing to do with.

Nanothermite = no Arab hijackers

Molten steel = no Arab hijackers

Molten molybdenum = no Arab hijackers

Molten iron flowing from WTC2 = no Arab hijackers

Twin towers explosions prior to airplane strike = no Arab hijackers

Wrong engine in WTC2 tower = no Arab hijackers

Many absolute impossibilities in USGOCT story = no Arab hijackers

Another evidence free post from you.
 
Does he do any other kind?

Zero evidence as usual, quag.



A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and willfully embraces delusion.
camlok



USA lies go around the world countless times before the truth has a chance to be uttered.
camlok
 
Let's look at the facts and get away from conspiracy theories for a moment. At the time, the U.S. Federal Government was run by ineptitude and a self-entitled blowhard who was naively friendly with the Saudis simply because his daddy was. All we need to know is that the feds failed at their job to protect 3,000 American citizens.

There was no "inside job," but simply "outward irresponsibility," and ever since the buffoon-in-chief and Trump Rogue State collaborated with Turkey and Russia to attempt to overthrow the Government and utilized KGB and military-industrialist tactics to sow disinformation and confusion - I'm beginning to realize that the most popular conspiracy theories (9/11 Inside Job being the most popular, besides the patently-absurd ones about the 'Illuminati') are a form of thought-control disseminated by politicians and political extremists to divide and conquer citizens. If you're going to be a conspiracy theorist, at least get creative with it and make up your own - since that is what conspiracy theories are: people making **** up for ****s and giggles.
 
Let's look at the facts and get away from conspiracy theories for a moment. At the time, the U.S. Federal Government was run by ineptitude and a self-entitled blowhard who was naively friendly with the Saudis simply because his daddy was. All we need to know is that the feds failed at their job to protect 3,000 American citizens.

There was no "inside job," but simply "outward irresponsibility," and ever since the buffoon-in-chief and Trump Rogue State collaborated with Turkey and Russia to attempt to overthrow the Government and utilized KGB and military-industrialist tactics to sow disinformation and confusion - I'm beginning to realize that the most popular conspiracy theories (9/11 Inside Job being the most popular, besides the patently-absurd ones about the 'Illuminati') are a form of thought-control disseminated by politicians and political extremists to divide and conquer citizens. If you're going to be a conspiracy theorist, at least get creative with it and make up your own - since that is what conspiracy theories are: people making **** up for ****s and giggles.

If we are allowed to use dictionary definitions here, a conspiracy theory is simply a theory about any given conspiracy that we do not yet understand fully.

Clearly, somebody conspired to bring the events of 9/11. The only issue to be discovered is just who the conspirators were. 16 years later it's clear that the official theory as developed by the 911 Commission lacks support from the facts and evidence.

As for myself, all I really know is that we were deceived that day, and the deception has been carried on by the media for all these years. I still don't know who conspired to do what, but it's clear the theory of hijackings and box cutters and impossible cell phone calls cannot pass muster, it fails.
 
Back
Top Bottom