Dubai Tower Burning: Luckily Muslims had it Built (Unlike WTC #7)

[FastPace]

Just good evidence American secularist are inferior and produce inferior projects, compared to the great engineering projects using proper science that Muslim nations produce.

Impressive fire and the building is not even in free fall collapse. :shock:

Dubai Torch Tower burning

Published on Aug 3, 2017

This video shared on social media shows the Dubai Torch Tower burning on Thursday evening.

Compared to the junk American secularist build via their superstitious beliefs. Oh look at that World Trade Center Building #7 not hit by a plane nor under a raging fire just collapse in free fall.

WTC7 in Freefall: No Longer Controversial

Published on Feb 12, 2010

[This is a reposting of this video which was taken down from the original site, originally posted in August 2008 just after the release of the final draft of the NIST WTC7 Report, prior to the final version which was altered to admit a 2.25 second period of freefall.]
This video tracks the motion of the NW corner of Building 7 of the World Trade Center on 9/11 2001. The building was in freefall for a period of ~2.5 seconds. This means it was falling through itself for over 100 feet with zero resistance, an impossibility in any natural scenario. This period of freefall is solid evidence that explosives had to be used to bring the building down. In the final draft for public comment (August 2008) NIST denied that WTC7 fell at freefall. In the final report in Nov 2008 they reversed themselves and admitted freefall, but denied its obvious significance.

American secularist my advice to you all: stop constructing buildings using superstition rather than engineering principles grounded in the psychical sciences. Maybe then you can get as scientific minded as the Muslims and build something worth a damn.

Or wait... the other option is Bldg. #7 was brought down in free fall by controlled demolition. :thinking

Naw... that can't be because that would mean the US people would have to question their own Federal Government with at least 10% the mental capability Catholic laity question the Vatican with. Now, that would just be crazy :screwy given the doctrine of infallibility in faith and morals the US Government has been supernaturally given.

 

[Mac77]

Most Dubai towers built before 2012 ‘have non fire-rated exterior panels’


https://www.thenational.ae/business...-have-non-fire-rated-exterior-panels-1.187389

An investigation by The National into the orgins and specification of the exterior panels used on the building raises serious questions over the fire safety of hundreds of buildings after the blaze at The Address Downtown.

 

[American]

Okay then. :roll::bs:screwy

 

[mike2810]

So much is wrong with the OP post. Typical bait post. :mrgreen:

 

[Thoreau72]

Yes, it's rather funny, and reminds me of the Britney Spears song, Oops, I did it again. :mrgreen:

Oops, another modern high rise catches fire and burns half the night and does not collapse.

But to the cognitive dissonant, that means nothing at all. He will still put all his intellectual honesty into the NIST bank. Yes, we have the government we deserve.

 

[FastPace]

So much is wrong with the OP post. Typical bait post. :mrgreen:

Stop constructing buildings with secular superstitious beliefs. Do like the Muslims and use science in your engineering, next time you all construct large buildings in NYC. Just some advice.

Former NIST Employee Speaks Out On World Trade Centre Towers Collapse Investigation

Published on Mar 14, 2017

In August of 2016, a former employee of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) began looking into the reports his agency had released years earlier on the collapse of the World Trade Center. What he found shook him to the core. In this poignant half-hour interview, Peter Michael Ketcham tells his story of discovering that the organization where he had worked for 14 years had deliberately suppressed the truth about the most pivotal event of the 21st century.

Through his willingness to look openly at what he failed to see in front of him for 15 years, Mr. Ketcham inspires us to believe that we can all muster the courage to confront the truth — and, in so doing, finally heal the wounds of 9/11.

 

[mike2810]

OP source of the quoted article is ?

"Published on Mar 14, 2017

In August of 2016, a former employee of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) began looking into the reports his agency had released years earlier on the collapse of the World Trade Center. What he found shook him to the core. In this poignant half-hour interview, Peter Michael Ketcham tells his story of discovering that the organization where he had worked for 14 years had deliberately suppressed the truth about the most pivotal event of the 21st century.

Through his willingness to look openly at what he failed to see in front of him for 15 years, Mr. Ketcham inspires us to believe that we can all muster the courage to confront the truth — and, in so doing, finally heal the wounds of 9/11. "

 

[Quag]

Oh look another truther tries to compare apples to oranges

 

[mike2810]

and posts with youtube vids and quotes from publications with no links to that publication.

 

[FastPace]

Oh look another truther tries to compare apples to oranges

Exactly! Took you a long time to figure that out which was pointed out in post #1: apples and oranges: WTC #7 collapses in free fall with no plane hitting it and no raging fire (apples). And the Dubai tower stands tall like a mighty Russian even though fires rage through it (oranges).

 

[Quag]

Exactly! Took you a long time to figure that out which was pointed out in post #1: apples and oranges: WTC #7 collapses in free fall with no plane hitting it and no raging fire (apples). And the Dubai tower stands tall like a mighty Russian even though fires rage through it (oranges).

WTC7 didnt collapse at freefall, stop trying to get your info from CT sites they all lie.

 

[yankintx]

This has to be the asshat post of the week.

 

[radioman]

Exactly! Took you a long time to figure that out which was pointed out in post #1: apples and oranges: WTC #7 collapses in free fall with no plane hitting it and no raging fire (apples). And the Dubai tower stands tall like a mighty Russian even though fires rage through it (oranges).

I'm fairly certain that WTC #7 sustained severe structural damage when the twin towers collapsed.
This damage---and the fire--- contributed to it's eventual collapse.

 

[FastPace]

and posts with youtube vids and quotes from publications with no links to that publication.

mike2810 go read your publications about Bruce Jenner being born with a female brain (one day some group will publish a paper about the non-binary people being born with the "they brains"), I don't care. Just as I don't care about your appeal to some lies in a published paper about WTC #7 tower. :boohoo:

Catholics will always question the Vatican more than you'll ever question the US Government. Bye, bye. :2wave:

 

[FastPace]

I'm fairly certain that WTC #7 sustained severe structural damage when the twin towers collapsed.
This damage---and the fire--- contributed to it's eventual collapse.

A free fall collapse

So, when I shadow box there is less resistance than when I punch the heavy bag. You've never down martial arts and been flipped to the floor I can see. Because had you you would know you body hits the floor rather than all floors collapsing before your body hits it and you are the floors free fall through the air.

Or as the video points out, metal beams fall downward vertically and don't shoot out windows horizontally unless some force thrust them out horizontally (e.g., explosives).

 

[Tanngrisnir]

Yes, it's rather funny, and reminds me of the Britney Spears song, Oops, I did it again. :mrgreen:

Oops, another modern high rise catches fire and burns half the night and does not collapse.

But to the cognitive dissonant, that means nothing at all. He will still put all his intellectual honesty into the NIST bank. Yes, we have the government we deserve.

Oh, just stop.

We both know, and you've publicly admitted, that nothing happened on 9/11 to the tower. They're still standing, as you confirmed.

 

[Quag]

A free fall collapse

So, when I shadow box there is less resistance than when I punch the heavy bag. You've never down martial arts and been flipped to the floor I can see. Because had you you would know you body hits the floor rather than all floors collapsing before your body hits it and you are the floors free fall through the air.

Or as the video points out, metal beams fall downward vertically and don't shoot out windows horizontally unless some force thrust them out horizontally (e.g., explosives).

WTC7 Didnt collapse at freefall stop spreading lies

 

[mike2810]

mike2810 go read your publications about Bruce Jenner being born with a female brain (one day some group will publish a paper about the non-binary people being born with the "they brains"), I don't care. Just as I don't care about your appeal to some lies in a published paper about WTC #7 tower. :boohoo:

Catholics will always question the Vatican more than you'll ever question the US Government. Bye, bye. :2wave:

IDK about your opinion. You really should try fact checking some of your statements.

Take a look at the analysis for WTC7
http://www.sharpprintinginc.com/911..._op=view_page&PAGE_id=39&MMN_position=385:385

You quote a publication and don't prove the source or link to it. Great way to debate or are you trolling?. ..:thumbdown

 

[mike2810]

A free fall collapse

So, when I shadow box there is less resistance than when I punch the heavy bag. You've never down martial arts and been flipped to the floor I can see. Because had you you would know you body hits the floor rather than all floors collapsing before your body hits it and you are the floors free fall through the air.

Or as the video points out, metal beams fall downward vertically and don't shoot out windows horizontally unless some force thrust them out horizontally (e.g., explosives).

You are just rehashing topics that have already been discussed. Try searching this forum.

Better yet. Start a thread and outline what you believe happened on 9/11 and how the buildings collapsed. Your explanation should stand on its own merits. Forget what the govt said. What do you believe happened and provide the evidence/proof.

 

[mike2810]

WTC7 didnt collapse at freefall, stop trying to get your info from CT sites they all lie.

Let's not start playing wack a mole again. Everything FastPace has put forth so far has been debated. As we all know nothing new from the CT crowd.

 

[Quag]

Let's not start playing wack a mole again. Everything FastPace has put forth so far has been debated. As we all know nothing new from the CT crowd.

its not whack a mole, He claimed that WTC7 collapseed at freefall this is a proven and known lie. No need to go any farther untill he admits it is false
Just keep pointing out his claim is false and dont let him divert to anything untill he admits it. This way there are no moles to whack.
My guess is just likw Cam and psy he will run away soon enough

 

[Tigerace117]

mike2810 go read your publications about Bruce Jenner being born with a female brain (one day some group will publish a paper about the non-binary people being born with the "they brains"), I don't care. Just as I don't care about your appeal to some lies in a published paper about WTC #7 tower. :boohoo:

Catholics will always question the Vatican more than you'll ever question the US Government. Bye, bye. :2wave:

Who cares how much Catholics question the Vatican? It's literally beyond irrelevant. Despite the fact that there was a papal bull stating that the Pope is always right.

You believing in CT nonsense just shows that you don't really understand the basic facts of the case.

 

[Thoreau72]

You are just rehashing topics that have already been discussed. Try searching this forum.

Better yet. Start a thread and outline what you believe happened on 9/11 and how the buildings collapsed. Your explanation should stand on its own merits. Forget what the govt said. What do you believe happened and provide the evidence/proof.

And you sir are just repeating the same old government song & dance that cannot be true.

As this latest example demonstrates for the umpteenth time, when modern high rise buildings catch fire and burn for many long hours, they do not collapse at free fall rates. The NIST sophistry that you embrace is exposed yet again. And all you can do is repeat your authoritarian talking points. A sad demonstration of severe cognitive dissonance and obedience to authority, Milgram style, another effort in the demolition of truth.

 

[mike2810]

And you sir are just repeating the same old government song & dance that cannot be true.

As this latest example demonstrates for the umpteenth time, when modern high rise buildings catch fire and burn for many long hours, they do not collapse at free fall rates. The NIST sophistry that you embrace is exposed yet again. And all you can do is repeat your authoritarian talking points. A sad demonstration of severe cognitive dissonance and obedience to authority, Milgram style, another effort in the demolition of truth.

There is a reason for the repeating. You and others bring nothing new to the table. You and others provide alternatives that are shown to be false and impossible to be correct.

For you it seems, different design, materials, improved safety standards, building condition , etc. means nothing to you. So funny you keep repeating the same things.
We know you have said you have the answers. Maybe you can convince AE911T your correct regarding nukes. They disagree with you. The biggest problem you have is there is no one concise CD explanation. There never will be because it didn't happen with CD. No matter how many times say " severe cognitive dissonance ". Maybe Russian would be a better place for you to live.eace:mrgreen:

 

[Grand Mal]

So much is wrong with the OP post. Typical bait post. :mrgreen:

What? You gonna argue with 'psychical sciences'?