• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Grenfell Towers doesn't come crashing down, crashing down, crashing down [W:57]

C

camlok

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 17, 2017
Messages
6,268
Reaction score
614
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
:roll: Jesus Almighty. Politicizing disaster and death.
 
Rogue Valley said:
:roll: Jesus Almighty. Politicizing disaster and death.
Click to expand...

Jesus Keeerist on a popsicle stick.Who politicized the 911 disaster for political, military, war criminal reasons?

Have you no common sense at all?
 
camlok said:
Grenfell Tower didn't collapse from hours long, raging fires. Only American exceptionalism can make steel framed high rises collapse from fires. That, and extraordinary US government lies, propaganda, fables, ... .

Grenfell Tower would have collapsed if built four years earlier, says expert

Grenfell Tower would have collapsed if built four years earlier, says expert
Click to expand...

Truther doesn't understand science science.
Seriosly you really need to read a non CT book and learn some actual science Cam.
 
Rogue Valley said:
:roll: Jesus Almighty. Politicizing disaster and death.
Click to expand...

It's already political. It was social housing, and the outside was coated in plastic to improve their richer neighbours' view of it contributing to the rapid deadly spread of the fire.

The tower was essentially concrete, which is more fire-resistant.
 
Manc Skipper said:
It's already political. It was social housing, and the outside was coated in plastic to improve their richer neighbours' view of it contributing to the rapid deadly spread of the fire.
Click to expand...

Sure it wasnt plastic explosives?
Remember in CT land explosives equal fire and fire means nanothermite and thermite means nukes and nukes mean meltdowns and meltdowns explosions but the non radioactive kind.
 
Manc Skipper said:
It's already political. It was social housing, and the outside was coated in plastic to improve their richer neighbours' view of it contributing to the rapid deadly spread of the fire.

The tower was essentially concrete, which is more fire-resistant.
Click to expand...

Were there no fire codes over there.
 
WCH said:
Were there no fire codes over there.
Click to expand...

From my understanding there were, but they just didn't care. And to make it worse the previous MP for that constituency voted against a law requiring landlords to make necessary repairs, for example to meet fire code.
 
Some of these public housing buildings are built very sturdy. They have prison quality block walls to minimize damage by the inmates, I mean residents.
 
WCH said:
Were there no fire codes over there.
Click to expand...

Yes. The residents were complaining for years, but it's social housing, and the Conservative government has been on an "austerity" kick, so cutbacks abound UK high rise buildings depend on passive protection. This building underwent a ten million pound refit last year, but the government dropped the requirement for a sprinkler system. Instead, they clad it in plastic to improve the view of the wealthy neighbours.
 
Quag said:
Sure it wasnt plastic explosives?
Remember in CT land explosives equal fire and fire means nanothermite and thermite means nukes and nukes mean meltdowns and meltdowns explosions but the non radioactive kind.
Click to expand...

No CT's here. Like the tower fire a couple of years back (was it Dubai?) the new exterior cladding burned, and channelled the fire up the outside of the building. Some of the early pics show a diagonal stripe of flames up and across the building.

Grenfell Tower fire: Experts now warn of cladding fire risk | Metro News
 
Manc Skipper said:
Yes. The residents were complaining for years, but it's social housing, and the Conservative government has been on an "austerity" kick, so cutbacks abound UK high rise buildings depend on passive protection. This building underwent a ten million pound refit last year, but the government dropped the requirement for a sprinkler system. Instead, they clad it in plastic to improve the view of the wealthy neighbours.
Click to expand...
Well I certainly hope they hold those responsible accountable.
 
Not to intentionally meta-moderate or anything, but WTF is this doing in Breaking News - MSM, and not in the conspiracy theories subsection?
 
camlok said:
Jesus Keeerist on a popsicle stick.Who politicized the 911 disaster for political, military, war criminal reasons?

Have you no common sense at all?
Click to expand...

Ah duh, two wrongs do not make it right
 
WCH said:
Were there no fire codes over there.
Click to expand...

I lived in the UK, there fire codes are just as strict as ours, if not more so as they must follow EU Regs. Try Google, its free.
 
Manc Skipper said:
No CT's here. Like the tower fire a couple of years back (was it Dubai?) the new exterior cladding burned, and channelled the fire up the outside of the building. Some of the early pics show a diagonal stripe of flames up and across the building.

Grenfell Tower fire: Experts now warn of cladding fire risk | Metro News
Click to expand...

Sorry but this thread was created by a truther to show that the collapses on 911 could not have been caused by the impacts and fires, so you can take your facts and logic elsewhere ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom