- Joined
- Aug 14, 2012
- Messages
- 35,070
- Reaction score
- 26,905
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Left
If anything the earth is cooling. As I stated in an earlier reply with an image of snow in the Sahara desert.
Anecdotal evidence fallacy.
If anything the earth is cooling. As I stated in an earlier reply with an image of snow in the Sahara desert.
I find it interesting that is what you choose to point out, considering my initial thought was the climate change activists called it global warming due to the overall temperature increase but have all fully acknowledged the affects cause cooling in many climate regions. It was this argument that lead from the change of language from global warming to climate change. Climate is a system seeking equilibration so whenever you have areas of increased heating inevitably lead to regions of increased cooling.Anecdotal evidence fallacy.
I find it interesting that is what you choose to point out, considering my initial thought was the climate change activists called it global warming due to the overall temperature increase but have all fully acknowledged the affects cause cooling in many climate regions. It was this argument that lead from the change of language from global warming to climate change. Climate is a system seeking equilibration so whenever you have areas of increased heating inevitably lead to regions of increased cooling.
I can respect that; however, I strongly disagree that is a reasonable exception of others.My point was that cherry-picking an event does not prove one's point, whether it is the AGW or anti-AGW side. We must look at the information available to us before coming to a conclusion. I was once a climate change-skeptic. I was not swayed by swimming polar bears and disappearing beaches, but by the overwhelming wealth of statistics/studies.
Anecdotal evidence fallacy.
Because your post seemed a bit (ahem) paranoid, reminding me of flouridation fears of a generation ago, or the voter fraud fantasies of today, conspiracies so vast they make the mind reel.
Anecdotal evidence fallacy.
I was not swayed by swimming polar bears and disappearing beaches, but by the overwhelming wealth of statistics/studies.
Climate change researchers cancel expedition because of climate change
Climate change researchers cancel expedition because of climate change - Manitoba - CBC News
But you see, my fellow man, there IS a big, huge conspiracy at work,wether you like it, believe it or not.
And it is huge, hence 'global conspiracy'.
But it is fascinating.And very dangerous,
How were you chosen to know about something we other mortals can't see?
I am not 'chosen'. Anybody can find this out, but you have to do a lot of research.(And in the meantime stay away from anything 'mainstream', because you will find out is all LIES, hence te-LIE-vison. )
Provide links to the research instead of DavidIcke images from his website.
David Icke states the models are wrong due to "garbage" data used. My question then is how is his data correct? Isn't he using the same climate data to come up with his conclusions?
It is very clear that the whole basis is wrong from the start. it is ALL propaganda.
Furgermore, I also stated that I recommend his books, because you have to connect a lot of dots, BUT if you do it will become very very clear how and why and by whom this is done. But there is a much larger context you need to look it. So, people have to start researching this for themselves, there is no other way.
I am not saying GW is real or made up. The earth has gone through climate cycles. My point is Ickes could be just as wrong as the scientist who claim GW is real.
Seems the most reasonable approach is to say. "we don't know for sure" GW.
If you read his books and the researcj in it is very clear that first, Global Warming is one huge hoas, and secondly that an ice-age is coming. I am pretty sure it is, the sign are all there. But, again, you have to do the research and connect the dots, nobody can do that for someone else.
Yep. going to be 114 to 115 the next few days in Phoenix , AZ. People can feel the cold breeze just days away.:lamo
I agree, that is why I have stated Ickes has not proven this explanation anymore than some other person saying they can prove GW.
Do you believe humans have an impact on the environment? Yes or No will do.
You have to define the impact first, before I can answer that.
Yep. going to be 114 to 115 the next few days in Phoenix , AZ. People can feel the cold breeze just days away.:lamo
I agree, that is why I have stated Ickes has not proven this explanation anymore than some other person saying they can prove GW.
Do you believe humans have an impact on the environment? Yes or No will do.
I used to live in Phoenix... It's always 100+ in that freeking place. Also there is a heatwave coming for most of California ( and that includes PHX ) so yea extreme's happen..
djl
So did I. I still live in AZ.
Do you believe the amount of concreate and asphalt that now exists in the Phoenix metro area have an impact on the trend of increased temps?
Phx area grew a bunch between 07 and today.