- Joined
- Jan 26, 2010
- Messages
- 39,331
- Reaction score
- 22,740
- Location
- arizona
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Nobody, not even NIST would suggest such a goofy thing. You don't even understand what 'allude' means either.
If only one bit of one wall, dog almighty that is nuts, was in free fall the other three sides and the "more" you somehow imagined, would be left above the roof line of the descending building for all to see. That did not happen.
What the hell were you gazing at?
Here's a video that shows for those who are legally blind, that the entire building, tied together as it was descended in free fall.
WTC Building 7 Collapse - 23 angles
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnLcUxV1dPo
We must make note here that NIST at first denied free fall. A large number of scientists should not make such an amateur mistake. When they were caught out on their lie, they were like deer caught in headlights. It was completely apparent that they were lying from their discombobulated speech, like children caught in a known lie.
We must make note here that the usual US government conspiracy theory theorists have been denying all along that free fall even existed.
A better analysis of what happened. I posted this link for you in the past.
So back to the OP. Can
World Trade Center Evidence-Based Research
Interesting that you failed to show where this site is wrong.
"It appears that the core was slowed down by the perimeter. The core appears to have strained the floors, took down the perimeter and catapulted the outer shell downwards until the floors were once again less strained. After this it appears the whole interconnected unit fell together."
"There is further evidence of this during the collapse progression process. The section of the perimeter located farthest east fell slower than the rest of the perimeter and actually folded in on top of and over the rest of the building as shown in this short slow motion video:"
It would help if you would broaden your source list and get more facts before posting.