• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The alternative explanation to the government reports on 9/11

mike2810

mike2810

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 26, 2010
Messages
39,250
Reaction score
22,631
Location
arizona
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
After all these years, there is no one clear concise explanation regarding what some believe was the controlled demolition of WTC1,2,7.

Here you can lay out the concise explanation of what happened to those buildings. Post your supporting evidence and sources. It is not a thread about the government reports on WTC1,2,7. It is about the controlled demolition that some claim happened.
 
mike2810 said:
After all these years, there is no one clear concise explanation regarding what some believe was the controlled demolition of WTC1,2,7.

Here you can lay out the concise explanation of what happened to those buildings. Post your supporting evidence and sources. It is not a thread about the government reports on WTC1,2,7. It is about the controlled demolition that some claim happened.
Click to expand...

No takers amongst the truthers. No surprise there.
 
zyzygy said:
No takers amongst the truthers. No surprise there.
Click to expand...

Didn't expect any. I made the thread in response to a new one on the official explanation.

Wonder if there would be any response if I made a poll?
 
mike2810 said:
Didn't expect any. I made the thread in response to a new one on the official explanation.

Wonder if there would be any response if I made a poll?
Click to expand...

They still wouldn't post a full alternative theory. They don't have one.
 
zyzygy said:
They still wouldn't post a full alternative theory. They don't have one.
Click to expand...

I have been saying for years that the CD crowd does not have the one concise CD explanation . The infighting within and outside some of the groups like AE911T is pretty funny. Prager left because he could not convince them in was mini neutron bombs. Some say it was thermite (nano), others say, nope it was just plain c4. Others say, it is all of them. Let's not forget the missile crowd or the particle beam weapon of Dr Wood fame.

If the CD believers can say well its was not fire. Can't they say it was not nukes or missile or X. Most of them won't. TonySz of AE911T at least stated in his opinion there was no nukes. Hence the fall out with Jeff Prager.
 
Where are all the controlled demolition believers?
 
mike2810 said:
After all these years, there is no one clear concise explanation regarding what some believe was the controlled demolition of WTC1,2,7.

Here you can lay out the concise explanation of what happened to those buildings. Post your supporting evidence and sources. It is not a thread about the government reports on WTC1,2,7. It is about the controlled demolition that some claim happened.
Click to expand...

lol

Getting desperate , mike???


Good!!!
 
mike2810 said:
No. Just point out the fact that no one has provided one. If you know of one, provide the link.
Click to expand...

indeed, he is desperate!

Good, very good!
 
Pin dÁr said:
indeed, he is desperate!

Good, very good!
Click to expand...

Incredibly desperate the anti-truthers are, Pin.

When will one of them provide any evidence for the US government conspiracy theory. They are all anti-truther conspiracy theorists of the worst kind - they have no evidence.
 
camlok said:
Incredibly desperate the anti-truthers are, Pin.

When will one of them provide any evidence for the US government conspiracy theory. They are all anti-truther conspiracy theorists of the worst kind - they have no evidence.
Click to expand...
Almost as desperate as you being caught lying camlok?


camlok said:
I never said there was a missile.
Click to expand...

camlok said:
The missile that hit WTC 2 in Slow Motion

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpEct4q4z9o
Click to expand...

:roll:
 
gamolon said:
Almost as desperate as you being caught lying camlok?

Quote Originally Posted by camlok
I never said there was a missile.

Then gamolon misleadingly sticks the following in when he knows he isn't quoting me.

Quote Originally Posted by camlok
"The missile that hit WTC 2 in Slow Motion"
Click to expand...

I copied and pasted the title of a YouTube video.

This is so typical of liars. Again, I never once said there was a missile. What Gamolon, an ultimate anti-truther, is doing is FLAT OUT lying.

1. I am not the owner of that YouTube video.
2. I did not make up the title of that video.
3. It is not within my power to change the title of that video.

You either have the worse comprehension skills imaginable, Gamolon, or you are among the world's worst liars, in all respects. Which is it?

Anti-truthers are always doing personal attacks, it's all they do; they never address the evidence. And again, gamolon, is studiously avoiding addressing evidence here, or anywhere.

Never any evidence provided to support their own incredibly lame US government conspiracy theory. That's why there is no evidence - because they all know how lame their conspiracy theory is.
 
camlok said:
I copied and pasted the title of a YouTube video.

This is so typical of liars. Again, I never once said there was a missile. What Gamolon, an ultimate anti-truther, is doing is FLAT OUT lying.

1. I am not the owner of that YouTube video.
2. I did not make up the title of that video.
3. It is not within my power to change the title of that video.

You either have the worse comprehension skills imaginable, Gamolon, or you are among the world's worst liars, in all respects. Which is it?

Anti-truthers are always doing personal attacks, it's all they do; they never address the evidence. And again, gamolon, is studiously avoiding addressing evidence here, or anywhere.

Never any evidence provided to support their own incredibly lame US government conspiracy theory. That's why there is no evidence - because they all know how lame their conspiracy theory is.
Click to expand...
So you posted a video that claims there was a missile, you include the title of the video that states there was a missile, you put the term "nose cone" in quotes like you think it's something else, and say that the "nose cone" is 35 feet long (which is the length of some missiles).

Interesting.

And a question you continue to avoid answering.

How does the "perfect nose cone" exiting the tower show that the government is lying? Does it mean the "nose cone" was added to the video? Does it mean that the "nose cone" was something else?
 
camlok said:
And again, gamolon, is studiously avoiding addressing evidence here,
Click to expand...
How is it evidence camlok? What does the presence of the "perfect nose cone" in that video mean?
 
gamolon said:
So you posted a video that claims there was a missile, you include the title of the video that states there was a missile, you put the term "nose cone" in quotes like you think it's something else, and say that the "nose cone" is 35 feet long (which is the length of some missiles).
Click to expand...

You are still lying, gamolon, when you should be apologizing. That means you knew you were lying and here, you're still doing it. That is really really sick.
 
gamolon said:
And a question you continue to avoid answering.

How does the "perfect nose cone" exiting the tower show that the government is lying? Does it mean the "nose cone" was added to the video? Does it mean that the "nose cone" was something else?
Click to expand...

Typical anti-truther. Never address the evidence, just throw up smokescreen after smokescreen.
 
camlok said:
Typical anti-truther. Never address the evidence, just throw up smokescreen after smokescreen.
Click to expand...
:lamo

I am addressing the evidence.

What exactly does a "perfect nose cone" mean to you in regards to the official story? Funny you won't answer.
 
camlok said:
You are still lying, gamolon, when you should be apologizing. That means you knew you were lying and here, you're still doing it. That is really really sick.
Click to expand...
No I'm not.

You posted it whether it was the video title or not. You've done it more than once.
 
What is the smooth, undamaged, round nosed protrusion seen exiting wtc2 between 0:06 and 0:10 of the video presently under discussion?

That is the question.
 
camlok said:
What is the smooth, undamaged, round nosed protrusion seen exiting wtc2 between 0:06 and 0:10 of the video presently under discussion?

That is the question.
Click to expand...
It's the debris cloud.
 
gamolon said:
No I'm not.

You posted it whether it was the video title or not. You've done it more than once.
Click to expand...

Yes, you are lying. As is the norm for anti-truthers.

Yes, I have, because it is the video title. If I were to change it that would be dishonest. That's your area.

And still no apology for your lie. That is really really sick.
 
camlok said:
What is the smooth, undamaged, round nosed protrusion seen exiting wtc2 between 0:06 and 0:10 of the video presently under discussion?

That is the question.
Click to expand...
What do you think it is?
 
gamolon said:
It's the debris cloud.
Click to expand...

There is no debris cloud in the specified time frame.

1. You are lying. 2. You haven't frame watched the video. 3. You are lying.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom