• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Pearl Harbor a conspiracy

Still no evidence from the right wing defenders of the US war criminals/terrorists/murders/thieves/rapists.

Mr Stockwell states it all perfectly. He describes what I have described in the sentence above.





This description, above, is from the 1980s but it describes exactly how the US has always operated, how it is operating today.

Which is why Roosevelt planned to have PH take the hit. He wanted to get into the war because US money grubbers saw a huge opportunity to steal more wealth. And lo and behold, that is exactly what they did in SE Asia.

Mr. Stockwell would be rather nonplussed to hear people like you manipulate his objections for your own agenda in the face of both facts and reality.

Your fantasies about the US entering the war to "steal wealth" are so absurd it's laughable.
 
Mr. Stockwell would be rather nonplussed to hear people like you manipulate his objections for your own agenda in the face of both facts and reality.

Your fantasies about the US entering the war to "steal wealth" are so absurd it's laughable.

Same old song and dance routine from the right wing defenders of the war criminals, the terrorists.

When you so enthusiastically support war criminals and terrorists you are no better than them.
 
What is it exactly that citizens of the US like about being used as Pearl Harbors/911 dummies to be blown up, crushed, set on fire, ... ?

This shows you the incredible power of US propaganda.
 
Same old song and dance routine from the right wing defenders of the war criminals, the terrorists.

When you so enthusiastically support war criminals and terrorists you are no better than them.

That's right bud. Which is why people like you so eagerly support such groups.
 
Mr. Stockwell would be rather nonplussed to hear people like you manipulate his objections for your own agenda in the face of both facts and reality.

Your fantasies about the US entering the war to "steal wealth" are so absurd it's laughable.

All his "theories" are absurd.
 
That's right bud. Which is why people like you so eagerly support such groups.

Nothing from Tiger yet again.

I don't support the USA in its war crimes and terrorism. That's you, Tiger. And the US is the leader in both categories.

No other country has had every leader/president guilty of being a Class A war criminal, by Nuremberg/USA standards.

And here you are defending Roosevelt, the guy who allowed so many to die just to help fill the pockets of American war criminals.
 
Stockwell would, in time of war, have those who rage against the US rendentioned to secret prisons for recalibration because their heads are on backwards.
 
Nothing from Tiger yet again.

I don't support the USA in its war crimes and terrorism. That's you, Tiger. And the US is the leader in both categories.

No other country has had every leader/president guilty of being a Class A war criminal, by Nuremberg/USA standards.

And here you are defending Roosevelt, the guy who allowed so many to die just to help fill the pockets of American war criminals.

Not even close to being the world leader, bud. Your beloved North Korea would be pretty high up there. Historically speaking, Germany, Russia and Japan would also be among the leaders. Not that people like you are capable of accepting facts.

The problem is that claim is bull****. There isn't a single US leader capable of being a "grade A war criminal". I've been letting you slide on that bull****, but now I'm going to make it perfectly clear--- thankfully enough, you don't understand the concept of a war crime.

Here you are, spreading bull**** because you are unwilling to accept reality.
 
The problem is that claim is bull****. There isn't a single US leader capable of being a "grade A war criminal". I've been letting you slide on that bull****, but now I'm going to make it perfectly clear--- thankfully enough, you don't understand the concept of a war crime.

Just more foot stomping and yelling from another anti-truther.

That's how they think they can make things "perfectly clear".

Also by denying science, they always try to make things "perfectly clear".

"If the Nuremberg laws were applied, then every post-war American president would have been hanged. By violation of the Nuremberg laws I mean the same kind of crimes for which people were hanged in Nuremberg. And Nuremberg means Nuremberg and Tokyo. So first of all you’ve got to think back as to what people were hanged for at Nuremberg and Tokyo. And once you think back, the question doesn’t even require a moment’s waste of time."
-Noam Chomsky
 
Just more foot stomping and yelling from another anti-truther.

That's how they think they can make things "perfectly clear".

Also by denying science, they always try to make things "perfectly clear".

"If the Nuremberg laws were applied, then every post-war American president would have been hanged. By violation of the Nuremberg laws I mean the same kind of crimes for which people were hanged in Nuremberg. And Nuremberg means Nuremberg and Tokyo. So first of all you’ve got to think back as to what people were hanged for at Nuremberg and Tokyo. And once you think back, the question doesn’t even require a moment’s waste of time."
-Noam Chomsky

Noam Chomsky was dead wrong on Cambodia, and dead wrong on this. But I'm not suprised that you aren't capable of thinking independently so you have to parrot other people's opinions.
 
Back
Top Bottom