• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

List of incorrect information being passed around regarding 9/11...

Pin dÁr said:
I don't believe in remote vieuwing, it is a scientific fact!
Click to expand...
Not even close. As explained, it is nothing but bad science. It's a scam. One of their own people admitted this.

Sorry to burst your bubble.
 
camlok said:
You explain how the steel stayed molten for 150 days. You explain how it came to be molten steel in the first place.

Both are fatal to the USGOCT. The US government has lied again. Is there anyone who would be surprised by that?
Click to expand...
You made the claim and you provide the evidence. That is how this sort of thing works. As there was no molten steel there is no evidence. That is your predicament.
 
Pin dÁr said:
I don't believe in remote vieuwing, it is a scientific fact!
Click to expand...

So you don't believe in scientific facts. Good to know

There is no credible evidence that remote viewing exists or works. It is considered as pseudoscience at best.

Of course you dodge the last part where I asked how accurate is remote viewing. So how accurate is it? Provide sources to back it up.

Let me project to the future. You may provide links to remote viewing websites to make the claim that it is very accurate. None will have independent testing to verify the results they publish.:lamo
 
Last edited:
10.
camlok said:
Nuclear explosions and controlled demolitions can also produce pyroclastic flows.
Click to expand...

This is completely false. First and foremost, pyroclastic flows/clouds are EXCLUSIVE to volcanoes. That right should be enough to stop the madness, but people still continue. definition and characteristics of a pyroclastic flow/cloud below.
How Volcanoes Work - Pyroclastic flows
A pyroclastic flow is a fluidized mixture of solid to semi-solid fragments and hot, expanding gases that flows down the flank of a volcanic edifice. These awesome features are heavier-than-air emulsions that move much like a snow avalanche, except that they are fiercely hot, contain toxic gases, and move at phenomenal, hurricane-force speeds, often over 100 km/hour. They are the most deadly of all volcanic phenomena.
Click to expand...

So once again for those that can't comprehend the above definition. If there is no volcano involved, it cannot be classified as a pyroclastic flow/cloud.
 
11.
camlok said:
And the 118 firefighters who reported bombs and explosions, secondary explosions.
Click to expand...

Yet another post with incorrect information. There were not 118 firefighters that reported bombs and explosions. None of those 118 firefighters reported WITNESSING a bomb go off. If you would have actually read the document you linked here: http://journalof911studies.com/articles/Article_5_118Witnesses_WorldTradeCenter.pdf, you would understand that. Context is everything. So let's clear up your "misunderstanding shall we?

First, your document bases it's numbers on words used by firefighters in their quotes.

The word "bomb" was used by 31 firefighters, not 118. If one looks at the context of these quotes, one sees that none of the 31 firefighters witnessed a bomb. Here are a couple of quotes from that linked paper above.

I remember asking Ray Downey was it the jet fuel that blew up. He said at that point he thought there were bombs up there because it was too even.
Click to expand...

I don't think we understood the magnitude of what was going on. I was fearful that there were bombs in the building. That was my first thought, being the military kind of guy that I am.
Click to expand...

I got up, I got into the parking garages, was knocked down by the percussion. I thought there had been an explosion or a bomb that they had blown up there.
Click to expand...

...we started to hear the second roar. That was the north tower now coming down. I should say that people in the street and myself included thought that the roar was so loud that the explosive - bombs were going off inside the building. Obviously we were later proved wrong.
Click to expand...

Oh, no. I didn't know what it was when we were inside. I didn't know the building had collapsed, actually. I thought it was a bomb. I thought a bomb had gone off. That's why I really didn't know until after.
Click to expand...

I thought, I thought, I thought... Not one direct witness of a bomb going off. I supposed if I said "I thought I heard a freight train when the tornado went through our neighborhood!", you would take that as proof that there actually WAS a freight train present. Some people really need to understand context. This is just a further example of truthers reaching for evidence when they have nothing else.
 
camlok said:
You explain how the steel stayed molten for 150 days. You explain how it came to be molten steel in the first place.

Both are fatal to the USGOCT. The US government has lied again. Is there anyone who would be surprised by that?
Click to expand...

You don't appear to know the meaning of the word evidence. Is English your first language?
 
gamolon said:
12.

Not even close to "scientific fact". The link to this post proves it.
https://www.debatepolitics.com/cons...-bridge-end-911-w-49-a-23.html#post1067110733

It contains quotes from a confession from someone who worked with Farsight and Courtney Brown. Looks like the data and information gathered for this scam was obtained in the most UNscientific ways possible.
Click to expand...

what are you saying now? That 'remote vieuwing' is not a scientific fact? If so, please do your homework!
 
Pin dÁr said:
what are you saying now? That 'remote vieuwing' is not a scientific fact? If so, please do your homework!
Click to expand...
Do MY homework?

:lamo

I just linked you my post with a confession from someone who worked at Farsight AND with Courtney Brown who said that they gathered their information in the most UNscientific ways. Brown rejected to having his "powers" tested in a controlled environment to validate them.

Can you say SCAM!

:lamo
 
Last edited:
gamolon said:
Do MY homework?

:lamo

I just linked you my post with a confession from someone who worked at Farsight AND with Courtney Brown who said that they gathered their information in the most UNscientific ways. Brown rejected to having his "powers" tested in a controlled environment to validate them.

Can you say SCAM!

:lamo
Click to expand...

The question was wheter or not 'remotie viewing' was scientificly proofed, yes? Well, yes it is.
 
gamolon said:
What about this link Pin? Scientific eh?
Click to expand...

No, not at all, it even starts wrong. It has nothing to do with clairvoyance or telepathy!

As usual the 'skeptic sites" have it all wrong.They are the gatekeepers an most of thse people work for the

government. Please don't take their nonsense too serious,




I know I know.
 
Pin dÁr said:
The question was wheter or not 'remotie viewing' was scientificly proofed, yes? Well, yes it is.
Click to expand...
No it's not. It's been proven to be a scam! The confession from an insider is proof of that. The techniques used were fraudulent. People with this supposed power were hand fed clues about things they were supposedly viewing. Courtney Brown was even caught lying about his "blind" readings!
 
Pin dÁr said:
The question was wheter or not 'remotie viewing' was scientificly proofed, yes? Well, yes it is.
Click to expand...
Links? data? Where was this proven?
 
gamolon said:
Links? data? Where was this proven?
Click to expand...

Pin is playing his usual game.

It is possible pin doesn't believe what he posts. He does it to get a reaction.
 
mike2810 said:
Pin is playing his usual game.

It is possible pin doesn't believe what he posts. He does it to get a reaction.
Click to expand...

He's a troll. Best thing is to ignore him.
 
gamolon said:
No it's not. It's been proven to be a scam! The confession from an insider is proof of that. The techniques used were fraudulent. People with this supposed power were hand fed clues about things they were supposedly viewing. Courtney Brown was even caught lying about his "blind" readings!
Click to expand...

No it is no scam but that is what they want you to believe.
 
mike2810 said:
Pin is playing his usual game.

It is possible pin doesn't believe what he posts. He does it to get a reaction.
Click to expand...

Duh?

I stand after anything I write. Just another cheap shot.
 
oh wait a minute!

This thread is called ": List of incorrect information being passed around regarding 9/11..."

Well ok, how about the official story which really is nothing more then a fairy tale?

Talking about incorrect information! man o man.
 
Well, well, well

STUNNING DEMONSTRATIONS OF REMOTE VIEWING

In 48 different television demonstrations Joe McMoneagle successfully described the contents of sealed envelopes, located missing people, producing a wealth of descriptive details about targets as well as drawing maps and landmarks leading to them. He was asked to find three people from names and birth dates placed in a sealed envelope. The people had been missing for more than thirty years and no-one knew if they were dead or alive. Detectives followed up on his information and all three people were located
Click to expand...

Joe McMoneagle Remote Viewing in Japan 6: Remote Viewing Info STAR GATE Remote Viewer #001 Joseph 'Joe' McMoneagle for Japanese Nippon TV live psychic challenge

Of course people here will go in denial mode, because they are too close minded,

But eh, you can't reject facts now, can you?
 
The plane that allegedly crashed at Shanksville was still flying some 20 minutes after the "crash". What kind of idiots would believe that a jumbo jet had crashed in that carved out hole?



IT IS CONCLUSIVE - 9/11 AIRCRAFT AIRBORNE WELL AFTER CRASH
UNITED 93 IN THE VICINITY OF FORT WAYNE, INDIANA AND CHAMPAIGN, ILLINOIS AT TIME OF SHANKSVILLE ALLEGED CRASH

(PilotsFor911Truth.org) - More information has surfaced which conclusively demonstrates the aircraft reportedly used on 9/11, were airborne well after their alleged crashes. This article supplements our last, "ACARS CONFIRMED - 9/11 AIRCRAFT AIRBORNE LONG AFTER CRASH" in which the ACARS system is explained as well as how to determine if a message were received by the aircraft, along with how ground stations are selected through Flight Tracking Protocol based on messages routed to United 175, N612UA. We now have further evidence which places United 93, N591UA, in the vicinity of Champaign, IL, 500+ miles away from the alleged crash site in Shanksville, PA. This information is further corroborated by a (now former) United Airlines Manager of Flight Dispatch Michael J. Winter.

On January 28, 2002, Mr. Winter gave an interview to the FBI at United Headquarters near Chicago, IL(1). During this interview, Mr. Winter reviewed a list of ACARS messages explaining the contents and which messages were received or rejected. The messages provided below are the most significant and fatal to what we have been told by the 9/11 Commission. Two messages were routed through the Fort Wayne, Indiana remote ground stations (FWA), followed by two more messages which were routed through Champaign, IL (CMI).

IT IS CONCLUSIVE - 9/11 AIRCRAFT AIRBORNE WELL AFTER CRASH
Click to expand...
 
camlok said:
The plane that allegedly crashed at Shanksville was still flying some 20 minutes after the "crash". What kind of idiots would believe that a jumbo jet had crashed in that carved out hole?
Click to expand...

ACARS has been discussed, debated and your stance you believe has been shown to be false.
Sad that the only sources you provide are from known CT sites.
 
Wrong engine for the WTC plane. Explain that.

Plane half in and half out of WTC2 and the surface is as perfect as it had been since it was built. Explain that.

Molten steel. Explain that.

Vaporized steel. Explain that.

Six percent of WTC dust is iron microspheres, the result of nanothermite. Explain that.

WTC7 fell at free fall speed. Explain that.

Twin towers fell at accelerating speed. Explain that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom