• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The supposed 1 world order...

depakote

Banned
Joined
Dec 5, 2016
Messages
164
Reaction score
1
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Instead of the 1 world order, how about a 3 way world order?

1 part, 1 part, 1 part.

The world divided in equal thirds.

1 third could be a Constitutional Republic.
1 third could be a Constitutional Monarch.
1 third could be a Monarch Republic.

Each third has its' own rules, own currency, own language.

Each third can choose how to run their third, how they want to elect, how they want to appoint.

And within each third are those who have foreign relations with the other parties' leaders.

Only 3 forms of currency, only 3 languages, with everybody on earth falling into one of the three categories....
 
Instead of the 1 world order, how about a 3 way world order?

1 part, 1 part, 1 part.

The world divided in equal thirds.

1 third could be a Constitutional Republic.
1 third could be a Constitutional Monarch.
1 third could be a Monarch Republic.

Each third has its' own rules, own currency, own language.

Each third can choose how to run their third, how they want to elect, how they want to appoint.

And within each third are those who have foreign relations with the other parties' leaders.

Only 3 forms of currency, only 3 languages, with everybody on earth falling into one of the three categories....

The system probably isn't stable. That is not any good
 
Everyone whom watches TV & Movies that the "so called progressive democrats control" feel that one world gov't is a great thing.
I would ask those same people three simple questions;

#1.) Why does our (U.S.A.) gov't break up monopolies, and why is it popular to do so (wouldn't that same competition be needed in regards to gov'ts to chose where to live under)?

#2.) Why would you want the gov't to have so much power & be so big when our (USA) gov't can't even get a multi-billion dollar website to work that they had years to prepare for? (ACA)

#3.) What benefits do you get from the ' New World World' as opposed to so many negatives I could provide?
 
Back
Top Bottom