- Joined
- Mar 17, 2017
- Messages
- 6,268
- Reaction score
- 614
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
It is completely impossible that the alleged 911 hijackers caused the collapse of WTC towers 1, 2 and 7.
The existence of molten metals; steel, molybdenum, iron at WTC the existence of vaporized steel at WTC, the existence of nanothermite at WTC all attest to the fact that the alleged hijackers did not cause the collapse of WTC towers 1, 2 and 7.
Pictures of the vaporized steel
https://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_apc.pdf
The only fuel that the hijackers are said to have brought to the WTC, according to the official government story, is jet fuel. Add office furnishings and you have fuels that can reach a maximum of about 1,800F. Steel melts at about 2,800F. Molybdenum melts at about 4,700F. Vaporized steel needs higher temperatures.
Point TT-6: The Claim that There Was No Molten Steel or Iron in the WTC
Point TT-6: Buildings
Point TT-6: The Claim That There Was No Molten Steel or Iron in the WTC Buildings | Consensus 911
The existence of molten metals; steel, molybdenum, iron at WTC the existence of vaporized steel at WTC, the existence of nanothermite at WTC all attest to the fact that the alleged hijackers did not cause the collapse of WTC towers 1, 2 and 7.
Pictures of the vaporized steel
https://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_apc.pdf
The only fuel that the hijackers are said to have brought to the WTC, according to the official government story, is jet fuel. Add office furnishings and you have fuels that can reach a maximum of about 1,800F. Steel melts at about 2,800F. Molybdenum melts at about 4,700F. Vaporized steel needs higher temperatures.
Point TT-6: The Claim that There Was No Molten Steel or Iron in the WTC
Point TT-6: Buildings
Point TT-6: The Claim That There Was No Molten Steel or Iron in the WTC Buildings | Consensus 911