You know what bothers me..... the words WMD...and how it is interpreted. Same with Assault Rifles and the term AR..... AR is not Assault Rifle its Armalite Rifle. But people want to put what ever term fits their Agenda.
WMD, to me is not a Nuclear weapon, its;
Weapon of mass destruction, munitions with the capacity to kill large numbers of human beings indiscriminately
Scud Missiles, Mustard Gas, chemical weapons, 120mm Motar rounds......are all Weapons of mass destruction, a Nuclear Bomb is NOT the only official type of WMD.
Did Iraq and its dictator have the ability to acquire WMD, and not NUCLEAR weapons, but weapons that have the ability to kill large numbers of human beings indiscriminately. YES... Saddam shows signs of ethnic Genocide, in relations to Religious beliefs, wiping out people that did now believe in his religion and his dictatorship. Invading or Kuwait etc.....
Now with that, YES I have been on the ground, was part of 432 combat ops, traveled a total of 34,000 miles during my time there from Kuwait, to the Syrian Border and back. Touching both the western and eastern boarders as well.... Did that country have mass casualty weapons.... YES...and without over stepping my Security Clearance. We were briefed of specific areas of concern, to include weapons and bio-hazards....hmmmm Why is that? hmmmmm.
Was the invasion to Iraq legitimate to 9/11? I dont know the answer to that...way above my Pay Grade.... but....and this is a huge but did that establish the Do not @#$%% With us..... well I would like to think so.....