The Bridge to End 911[W:49]

Thoreau72 · Apr 7, 2017

Re: The Bridge to End 911

Partsguy57 said:
Lol they were probably fully loaded or close to as they were headed overseas. What makes you think it atomized in the fireball???? That would never happen. Do you know anything about jet fuel , kerosene or Diesel?? ( very close to the same thing) these types of fuels or not very explosive as compared to gasoline. Thousands of pounds of fuel would never have atomized on impact!! Never!!! Planes , cars crash all the time and this never!!! Happens, not possible. Go talk to your local fuel supplier ( not the local gas station guy) and have a talk with a guy who sells large quantities of fuel for a living.

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk

Thank you for an excellent display of ignorance regarding the official story that you defend, thank you very much. :lol:

According to the official story that you defend, no flights were going "overseas", but at least 2 or 3 were going to California.

Yes, I know a little bit about jetfuel, and I've seen a few fireballs caused by aircraft impacting the ground. Liquids decelerated from 300 knots to 0 in 1 or 2 seconds DO atomize.

Stay in the parts business, Partsguy.

zyzygy · Apr 7, 2017

Re: The Bridge to End 911

Thoreau72 said:
I've seen a few fireballs caused by aircraft impacting the ground. Liquids decelerated from 300 knots to 0 in 1 or 2 seconds DO atomize.

Hollywood movies do not reflect reality.

Thoreau72 · Apr 7, 2017

Re: The Bridge to End 911

zyzygy said:
Hollywood movies do not reflect reality.

WTF does Hollywood movies have to do with this? With almost every post, your pitiful desperation shows.

Quag · Apr 7, 2017

Re: The Bridge to End 911

zyzygy said:
Hollywood movies do not reflect reality.

Planes didn't hit the ground they hit buildings, buildings that unlike the ground are mostly hollow. Funny how these steep impact crashes he claims to have seen are never the ones he uses when showing photos of plane crashes when claiming no plane at Shanksville. If he actually looked at those ones, such as Payne Stewarts crash he would see that they are extremely similar.
Like the non radioactive, non exploding mini nukes that explode and emit no radiation. HD is trying to use different parts of events to support his claims while ignoring the other parts of the same events that prove him wrong. Or to put it another way, he is trying to have his cake and eat it too. In the end he ends up without any cake and choking on the crumbs

It is another case of HD trying to compare apples to oranges and coming up with the wrong conclusions based solely on his ideology.

zyzygy · Apr 7, 2017

Re: The Bridge to End 911

Quag said:
Planes didn't hit the ground they hit buildings, buildings that unlike the ground are mostly hollow. Funny how these steep impact crashes he claims to have seen are never the ones he uses when showing photos of plane crashes when claiming no plane at Shanksville. If he actually looked at those ones, such as Payne Stewarts crash he would see that they are extremely similar.
Like the non radioactive, non exploding mini nukes that explode and emit no radiation. HD is trying to use different parts of events to support his claims while ignoring the other parts of the same events that prove him wrong. Or to put it another way, he is trying to have his cake and eat it too. In the end he ends up without any cake and choking on the crumbs

It is another case of HD trying to compare apples to oranges and coming up with the wrong conclusions based solely on his ideology.

Claims being the operative word.

zyzygy · Apr 7, 2017

Re: The Bridge to End 911

deleted

Partsguy57 · Apr 7, 2017

Re: The Bridge to End 911

Thoreau72 said:
Thank you for an excellent display of ignorance regarding the official story that you defend, thank you very much. [emoji38]

According to the official story that you defend, no flights were going "overseas", but at least 2 or 3 were going to California.

Yes, I know a little bit about jetfuel, and I've seen a few fireballs caused by aircraft impacting the ground. Liquids decelerated from 300 knots to 0 in 1 or 2 seconds DO atomize.

Stay in the parts business, Partsguy.

Well dude wherever they were going I can assure you they were not running on empty.. lol they had thousands of pounds of fuel on board as you well know.. nice try ... carry on with foolish..

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk

gamolon · Apr 7, 2017

Re: The Bridge to End 911

camlok said:
That would amount to me lying, something that I don't do.

The "top portion of the Madrid tower" was not all ferro/concrete. The core was ferro/concrete. The perimeter was steel. The floor slabs connected to the core and the perimeter steel. The steel on the upper portion collapsed.

So your claim that the entire top portion of the Madrid tower was ferro/concrete is incorrect. Or are you saying that the perimeter columns that supported the floor slabs were ferro/concrete columns?

gamolon · Apr 7, 2017

Re: The Bridge to End 911

camlok said:
The problem you are having is that the WTCs 1, 2 and 7 were not ferro/concrete structures, they were steel framed towers,

Meaning what camlok?

You don't think fire can weaken steel enough to make a structure collapse? That's one of the points of this discussion.

If you believe that office fires can't weaken steel enough to make a structure collapse, then explain why the steel portion of this structure collapsed. You want to talk science, then let's do it.

camlok · Apr 7, 2017

Re: The Bridge to End 911

gamolon said:
Meaning what camlok?

You don't think fire can weaken steel enough to make a structure collapse? That's one of the points of this discussion.

If you believe that office fires can't weaken steel enough to make a structure collapse, then explain why the steel portion of this structure collapsed. You want to talk science, then let's do it.

I really don't want to shock you folks too badly but as you can plainly see, the structure is still standing.

gamolon · Apr 7, 2017

Re: The Bridge to End 911

camlok said:
I really don't want to shock you folks too badly but as you can plainly see, the structure is still standing.

What caused the STEEL perimeter columns to buckle and collapse? According to you, fire can't do this to steel right? See, you've got yourself into quite a pickle now between your "the entire upper section of the Madrid tower was ferro/concrete" and "fire can't collpase a steel structure" garbage claims.

Now what camlok?

What science are you going to present now?

Thoreau72 · Apr 7, 2017

Re: The Bridge to End 911

Partsguy57 said:
Well dude wherever they were going I can assure you they were not running on empty.. lol they had thousands of pounds of fuel on board as you well know.. nice try ... carry on with foolish..

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk

Again, I was merely pointing out how clearly you demonstrated your ignorance of the details of the official story. Yes, your reply is "whatever", helping demonstrate your ignorance yet again. Thank you for your participation. :mrgreen:

zyzygy · Apr 7, 2017

Re: The Bridge to End 911

Thoreau72 said:
Again, I was merely pointing out how clearly you demonstrated your ignorance of the details of the official story. Yes, your reply is "whatever", helping demonstrate your ignorance yet again. Thank you for your participation. :mrgreen:

Your ignorance of the official story is also clear.

Thoreau72 · Apr 7, 2017

Re: The Bridge to End 911

zyzygy said:
Your ignorance of the official story is also clear.

You know that statement to be a damn lie, but that's why you made it.

zyzygy · Apr 7, 2017

Re: The Bridge to End 911

Thoreau72 said:
You know that statement to be a damn lie, but that's why you made it.

If you understood the official story then you would know that it fits the facts better than any truther story, not that any truther has a complete story.

Quag · Apr 8, 2017

Re: The Bridge to End 911

Thoreau72 said:
You know that statement to be a damn lie, but that's why you made it.

:lamo

There are irony meters exploding somewhere

Quag · Apr 8, 2017

Re: The Bridge to End 911

zyzygy said:
If you understood the official story then you would know that it fits the facts better than any truther story, not that any truther has a complete story.

Heck they dont even have coherent partial stories, instead they have snippets of mutually exclusive claims they believe are all true!

camlok · Apr 8, 2017

Re: The Bridge to End 911

zyzygy said:
If you understood the official story then you would know that it fits the facts better than

1. Molten steel, molten iron, molten molybdenum, vaporized lead, vaporized steel, blows the official fable out of the water.

2. WTC7 symmetrical collapse blows the official fable out of the water.

3. WTC7's free fall collapse blows the official fable out of the water.

4. Twin Towers accelerating collapses blows the official fable out of the water.

5. Nanothermite unreacted particles blows the official fable out of the water.

6. Nanothermite residue blows the official fable out of the water.

7. That nanothermite was even there blows the official fable out of the water.

8. The pyroclastic clouds, evidence of explosive demolitions blows the official fable out of the water.

9. [continue zyzygy]

zyzygy · Apr 8, 2017

Re: The Bridge to End 911

camlok said:
1. Molten steel, molten iron, molten molybdenum, vaporized lead, vaporized steel, blows the official fable out of the water.

2. WTC7 symmetrical collapse blows the official fable out of the water.

3. WTC7's free fall collapse blows the official fable out of the water.

4. Twin Towers accelerating collapses blows the official fable out of the water.

5. Nanothermite unreacted particles blows the official fable out of the water.

6. Nanothermite residue blows the official fable out of the water.

7. That nanothermite was even there blows the official fable out of the water.

8. The pyroclastic clouds, evidence of explosive demolitions blows the official fable out of the water.

9. [continue zyzygy]

You first. Continue but add some proof of your claims. Why are you still mentioning pyroclastic clouds? It has been shown that there were no pyroclastic clouds. Nano thermite? Where is the proof?

Quag · Apr 8, 2017

Re: The Bridge to End 911

camlok said:
1. Molten steel, molten iron, molten molybdenum, vaporized lead, vaporized steel, blows the official fable out of the water.

What molten steel?

2. WTC7 symmetrical collapse blows the official fable out of the water.

Why?

3. WTC7's free fall collapse blows the official fable out of the water.

It didnt collapse at free fall

4. Twin Towers accelerating collapses blows the official fable out of the water.

If they didnt accelerate they wouldnt have collapsed, they would have stayed still.

5. Nanothermite unreacted particles blows the official fable out of the water.
6. Nanothermite residue blows the official fable out of the water.
7. That nanothermite was even there blows the official fable out of the water.

No nanothermite blows away these claims

8. The pyroclastic clouds, evidence of explosive demolitions blows the official fable out of the water.

This false claim has already been disporven, why do you still lie about it?

9. [continue zyzygy]

So nothing but false claims and lack of comporehension on your part.
Why do truthers always lie?

zyzygy · Apr 8, 2017

Re: The Bridge to End 911

camlok said:
1. Molten steel, molten iron, molten molybdenum, vaporized lead, vaporized steel, blows the official fable out of the water.

2. WTC7 symmetrical collapse blows the official fable out of the water.

3. WTC7's free fall collapse blows the official fable out of the water.

4. Twin Towers accelerating collapses blows the official fable out of the water.

5. Nanothermite unreacted particles blows the official fable out of the water.

6. Nanothermite residue blows the official fable out of the water.

7. That nanothermite was even there blows the official fable out of the water.

8. The pyroclastic clouds, evidence of explosive demolitions blows the official fable out of the water.

9. [continue zyzygy]

camlok said:
I really don't want to shock you folks too badly but as you can plainly see, the structure is still standing.

Avoiding the point.

mike2810 · Apr 8, 2017

Re: The Bridge to End 911

zyzygy said:
Avoiding the point.

Funny how much of his list is supported by antidotal evidence at best. Seems it just a regurgitation of CT talking points.

Amazing the dust clouds that form when a high rise building collapses from an earthquake. Similar to when a building is taken down from a controlled demolition.

camlok · Apr 9, 2017

Re: The Bridge to End 911

mike2810 said:
Funny how much of his list is supported by antidotal evidence at best.

How old are you, mike? "antidotal", good dog almighty!

Quag · Apr 9, 2017

Re: The Bridge to End 911

camlok said:
How old are you, mike? "antidotal", good dog almighty!

Trying to avoid the fact that there was no pyroclastic flow by resorting to insults on typos?

mike2810 · Apr 9, 2017

Re: The Bridge to End 911

camlok said:
How old are you, mike? "antidotal", good dog almighty!

asked and answered in another post. Seek and you shall find.:lamo

The Bridge to End 911[W:49]

Well-known member