Distribution of body parts[W:374]

camlok · May 13, 2017

Re: Distribution of body parts

mike2810 said:
- The posts have been addressing your claims.

No, they most certainly have not. You folks avoid any discussion of the issues raised, like

1. how does the composite nose cone of a jet that can be badly damaged by a bird [you all have seen the photos] get thru two walls of 14 inch steel box columns in perfect condition?

mike2810 said:
I was addressing things you claim, like thermite.

So address it then.

2. Unreacted particles of nanothermite and by products of that same thermitic reaction, a high grade, high explosive, high density explosive, US government ONLY kind of explosive come to be at WTC, in WTC dust?

camlok · May 13, 2017

Re: Distribution of body parts

mike2810 said:
- Why should I?

Because you have taken on the mantle of "experts" who can defend the US government official conspiracy theory, yet no evidence can be advanced defending this nonsensical conspiracy theory.

There aren't even any videos of the alleged hijackers.

mike2810 said:
Do you believe that debris from the WTC tower damaged the WTC7 building?

Not believe. I know that debris from the twin towers caused some damage to wtc7 but that damage was minimal and it had no effect on the symmetrical, free fall collapse of WTC7.

mike2810 said:
Did the WTC7 building burn for hours before collapsing

There were scattered office fires that burned over roughly 7 hours. Scattered office fires cannot cause the collapse of a steel framed office tower. It has never before done so, nor has it since done so. Video evidence of the fires, where NIST said the collapse started, show the fires had gone out an hour before the building came down.

The steel was fully fireproofed. With scattered, organic [meaning moving office fires as the combustibles are burned], there isn't a snowball's chance in hell that there would be enough combustibles to cause what NIST said happened.

"In the mid-1990s British Steel and the Building Research Establishment performed a series of six experiments at Cardington to investigate the behavior of steel frame buildings. These experiments were conducted in a simulated, eight-story building. Secondary steel beams were not protected. Despite the temperature of the steel beams reaching 800-900° C (1,500-1,700° F) in three of the tests (well above the traditionally assumed critical temperature of 600° C (1,100° F), no collapse was observed in any of the six experiments."

Quote from the FEMA report (Appendix A).

Recalling that the North Tower suffered no major structural damage from the intense office fire of February 23, 1975, we can conclude that the ensuing office fires of September 11, 2001, also did little extra damage to the towers.

Conclusion:

The jet fuel fires played almost no role in the collapse of the World Trade Center.

How Hot Did The Jet Fuel Heat The World Trade Center?

These Cardington fires had huge stacks of wood 2x4 material placed all over the floors. It had extra combustibles added. NOTE: THE SECONDARY STEEL BEAMS WERE NOT FIRE PROTECTED!

Professor Leroy Hulsey's study confirms that - ZERO chance of the NIST fable being accurate as to the collapse of WTC7.

And how many lies did NIST advance in the years it took them to craft their fable?

1. No molten steel.
2. No shear studs.
3. No flange stiffners.
4. No composite floor.

Distribution of body parts[W:374]

camlok

camlok