- Joined
- Feb 3, 2016
- Messages
- 43,134
- Reaction score
- 16,114
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Sure, if you believe in the Illuminati rule the world. Or that it's the Famous Corporation, run by Ed McMahon, that secretly picks the President. (10 points to anyone who gets the reference)
No. Whens someone says "when you take him literally" that means there was no literal wire tapping but it means something else. You don't say "if you take such and such literally" then it's not true unless there is more to it. If there was nothing at all, then you'd just say something more like, "There's been no evidence that anything of the like was going on." You'd make a clear definitive statement.
Because it's still under investigation -- and the FBI and DoJ are not allowed to make official comment until the conclusion is finished.
I might add that dealing with the President shooting his mouth off, and accusing the President like this, doesn't speed up that process.
This response makes no sense. I'm talking about the leakers. Why are the people leaking only enough to give the appearance of a scandal but not provide the smoking gun? They've already committed serious crimes to leak in the first place so why not provide hard evidence? You answered a question I didn't ask.