• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

200 Questions For 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists

Well, the missile theory also has a fundamental flaw.

Its not a theory, its a fantasy created by people with little to no aviation knowledge but a large amount of hatred and distrust for the ebil US govt.
 
Great point. We always provide enemies with over $100 million dollars.

so if they r an ally, y they not comin up from a list of our allies in 2001
 
You said yourself in the thread on chemtrails: it makes no sense to release chemicals at high altitude if the goal is dosing a population with whatever sinister drug you're using to control them. (most chemtrail people think its some kind of mind control or whatever, I'm aware you don't share this opinion) Apparently, this fundamental flaw in the supposed plan was enough for you to dismiss that particular version of the conspiracy.

Well, the missile theory also has a fundamental flaw.

Actually, getting down to details, if it turned out that the chemicals being released (assuming it does happen) act most effectively for their purpose (whatever that might be, humans or just environment) at high altitudes, I could possibly believe that. A whole lotta ifs.

What is this fundamental flaw with "the missile theory"?
 
Actually, getting down to details, if it turned out that the chemicals being released (assuming it does happen) act most effectively for their purpose (whatever that might be, humans or just environment) at high altitudes, I could possibly believe that. A whole lotta ifs.

What is this fundamental flaw with "the missile theory"?

fundamental flaw. It didn't happen the way the missile supporters think it did.

As far as "chemtrails", what details did you provide?

Your statement starts out "if it turned out".... (your playing a guessing game).
"that the chemicals being released (assuming it does happen)", (you further clarify just playing a what if)
"act most effectively ............. whatever that might be). (Yes a whole lot of ifs))

What if it turns out those who believe Gage, et.al have all been fooled, and it turns out AE911T are wrong about the CD of WTC1,2,7, and in the end it was a way to have Gage make money. That is a whole lotta of non ifs one can believe in. :lamo:peace
 
Actually, getting down to details, if it turned out that the chemicals being released (assuming it does happen) act most effectively for their purpose (whatever that might be, humans or just environment) at high altitudes, I could possibly believe that. A whole lotta ifs.
"If it turned out?"

What, you mean if it turned out that physics and chemistry just don't matter anymore, that an infinitesimally small and completely uncontrollable dosage is more effective than a more concentrated, more controlled dosage?

Sure, if it turned out that literal magic exists, then I could possibly believe a lot of things. Like radiation-free nukes and visible x-rays.

You brought up weather again, did you miss the fact that this discussion is specifically focused on the theory that this is to affect humans?

What is this fundamental flaw with "the missile theory"?

I already told you: using a missile when you clearly have access to airplanes. It just introduces a hundred different ways of getting caught for no gain whatsoever.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom