• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Debunk This If You Can[W:107]

TheHammer said:
Then you should be able to debunk the insinuations by simply posting the quotes in their proper context then right? How come you won't/can't do that?



What's "dishonest" about posting the quotes of a famous radio talk show host?

The agenda of this thread is to give equal time to the opposing view of the quotes of a radio talk show host. I simply want to know if the quotes are invalid representations of what President Obama actually said and did. Apparently you can't provide that, so you attempt to shoot the messenger, huh? Interesting!
Click to expand...

Because with someone like you there is little to no point showing you reality. You've already so fallen into a fantasy world of your own creation you simply can't accept facts.

Famous? I've never heard of this Mike Gallagher individual. And while watching lemmings follow each other around crying about secret Muslim plots of some other dumb bull**** is funny, it's also a massive waste of time.
 
faithful_servant said:
The comments are taken out of context. Post them within the context in which they were originally said if you think that they are valid.
Click to expand...

Director Krennic: "Governor Tarkin, I suggest that you provide some context for the situa-"

Tarkin: *waves hand* "That won't be necessary, Director Krennic. The narrative will do for now."
 
Thoreau72 said:
Who conspired with whom?
Click to expand...

I see no conspiracy, only comments by a radio talk show host. It is apparent that you cannot show those comments to be untrue. Interesting!
 
Tigerace117 said:
Because with someone like you there is little to no point showing you reality. You've already so fallen into a fantasy world of your own creation you simply can't accept facts.
Click to expand...

What facts have you presented? The agenda of this thread is to offer opposing comments contrary to those comments made by a "famous" radio talk show host. Can you say that Obama has never said or did any of those things Gallagher accuses him of? Or do you only know how to attempt to shoot the messenger?

Famous? I've never heard of this Mike Gallagher individual.
Click to expand...

You don't listen to rightwing radio? GOOGLE "Mike Gallagher" and read then you'll observe his fame.

And while watching lemmings follow each other around crying about secret Muslim plots of some other dumb bull**** is funny, it's also a massive waste of time.
Click to expand...

Since you consider this thread as such, why the hell are you wasting so much time?
 
faithful_servant said:
The comments are taken out of context. Post them within the context in which they were originally said if you think that they are valid.
Click to expand...

Again! I repeat! This thread is NOT about whether I think Mike Gallagher's are valid or not, the agenda is to offer equal time to opposing views to Gallagher's accusations. If you have nothing to offer, fine!
 
TheGoverness said:
Director Krennic: "Governor Tarkin, I suggest that you provide some context for the situa-"

Tarkin: *waves hand* "That won't be necessary, Director Krennic. The narrative will do for now."
Click to expand...

So you still have nothing to offer in opposition to the "narrative" for now, just feeble attempts to insult the OP messenger, right?
 
TheHammer said:
Why should I be embarrassed by anything Mike Gallagher says? I simply ask y'all to "debunk it if you can." Thus far, nobody has even made a rational attempt at that. Interesting!
Click to expand...

It's already been debunked, as it's self-refuting.
 
TheHammer said:
Again! I repeat! This thread is NOT about whether I think Mike Gallagher's are valid or not, the agenda is to offer equal time to opposing views to Gallagher's accusations. If you have nothing to offer, fine!
Click to expand...

I'll gladly address your points, when they are presented accurately. So far all you've done is take a bunch of comments out of context. Give the full context of the comments and I'll gladly address them. What you're doing is creating a false narrative and asking people to refute it. The fact that it is a false narrative is refutation enough. Keep in mind that I'm NO fan of Pres. Obama, but I'm also NO fan of deceptive tactics like the one you are using.
 
faithful_servant said:
I'll gladly address your points, when they are presented accurately. So far all you've done is take a bunch of comments out of context. Give the full context of the comments and I'll gladly address them. What you're doing is creating a false narrative and asking people to refute it. The fact that it is a false narrative is refutation enough. Keep in mind that I'm NO fan of Pres. Obama, but I'm also NO fan of deceptive tactics like the one you are using.
Click to expand...

On the contrary! The narrative is NOT false. The narrative involved in this thread is simply to present opportunities for others to show that Mike Gallagher's accusations about Barrack Obama are untrue or presented in a "CONTEXT" that would make them "FALSE" or said or done to make them represent something that they do not represent. If you can't do that, you have nothing to offer to the thread.

So far only one poster has understood the objective of the thread and actually posted some realistic evidence that at least SOME of what Gallagher has insinuated is refutable.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
Why would I need one when you haven't provided any context?

Thanks for admitting they're self-refuting.
Click to expand...

Thanks for offering the fact that you have nothing to offer this thread!
 
Tanngrisnir said:
LOL! Exactly like the OP itself!

Thanks for admitting it's a false narrative and the points are self-refuting.
Click to expand...

If you only knew how and why, huh? Maybe you'll have something to actually offer the next thread?
 
TheHammer said:
If you only knew how and why, huh? Maybe you'll have something to actually offer the next thread?
Click to expand...

Yes, and I've already offered it.

Thanks for admitting it's a false narrative and the points are self-refuting.
 
TheHammer said:
If you only knew how and why, huh? Maybe you'll have something to actually offer the next thread?
Click to expand...

What point are you trying to make with this thread?
Are you trying to claim Obama is Muslim?
 
TheHammer said:
On the contrary! The narrative is NOT false. The narrative involved in this thread is simply to present opportunities for others to show that Mike Gallagher's accusations about Barrack Obama are untrue or presented in a "CONTEXT" that would make them "FALSE" or said or done to make them represent something that they do not represent. If you can't do that, you have nothing to offer to the thread.

So far only one poster has understood the objective of the thread and actually posted some realistic evidence that at least SOME of what Gallagher has insinuated is refutable.
Click to expand...

OK, I guess I see what you mean now. If the claim is that Barack is a muslim, I won't argue with that. Maybe he is, maybe he isn't, though Gallagher offers fair circumstantial evidence he is at least sympathetic to the muslim religion. So is Keith Ellison in Congress, and I'm fine with that.

I would rather Obama be an atheist, but either way is OK by me.
 
Quag said:
What point are you trying to make with this thread?
Are you trying to claim Obama is Muslim?
Click to expand...

How many times do I have to post in this thread that its agenda is to give voice to anyone who can dismantle the accusations of a radio talk show host who made those accusations that I posted in the OP? Do you have anything to contribute? Did Obama say and do what the radio talk show host said he did, or not?
 
Thoreau72 said:
OK, I guess I see what you mean now. If the claim is that Barack is a muslim, I won't argue with that. Maybe he is, maybe he isn't, though Gallagher offers fair circumstantial evidence he is at least sympathetic to the muslim religion. So is Keith Ellison in Congress, and I'm fine with that.

I would rather Obama be an atheist, but either way is OK by me.
Click to expand...

Thanks! Honest folk are a breath of fresh air these days!
 
TheHammer said:
How many times do I have to post in this thread that its agenda is to give voice to anyone who can dismantle the accusations of a radio talk show host who made those accusations that I posted in the OP? Do you have anything to contribute? Did Obama say and do what the radio talk show host said he did, or not?
Click to expand...

What accusations? That Obama is a Muslim? Is that the accusation?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom