• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

WTC Collapse, It's not adding up

mike2810 said:
I agree. This will only eventually result in thread banning. They won't start a thread to only discuss CD. I have asked.
Click to expand...
There is no point in starting a thread about a CD theory when you have proven that you follow hypocritical logic and you refuse/ignore to address very simple questions which are asked of you.

No honest debate/discussion could ever happen because you do not appear to show any signs of honesty and you are more interested in point scoring.
 
Bodhisattva said:
There is something undeniably wrong with the cover story of the collapse.
Click to expand...

It's made worse when the government gets caught lying a few short years later about that whole WMD crap.
 
mike2810 said:
ah, but I can prove their were fires. Can you prove the existence of the explosives that were used? (mini neutron bombs as I recall is your current favorite. Though you also believe nanothermite and conventional explosives were most likely also used). Oh wait, you just admitted you can't,:lamo
Click to expand...

You can prove the obvious? You can prove something we both agree on? I am SO impressed....

Wow Mike, you are so very persuasive in your debating skills. :lol:
 
calamity said:
It's made worse when the government gets caught lying a few short years later about that whole WMD crap.
Click to expand...

Yep. That was pretty horrible.
 
stundie said:
There is no point in starting a thread about a CD theory when you have proven that you follow hypocritical logic and you refuse/ignore to address very simple questions which are asked of you.

No honest debate/discussion could ever happen because you do not appear to show any signs of honesty and you are more interested in point scoring.
Click to expand...

This is a debate site not a discussion site.
 
calamity said:
IMO, it totally discredits government.
Click to expand...

Agreed. I pretty much don't trust a word our gov says about anything any more. Liars. Money. Etc.

They are all corrupt. Awarding contracts to friends and family. Letting off corrupt bankers. Using taxpayer money for private jets. All a bunch of skank bastards.
 
Bodhisattva said:
A discussion is conversation to consult a controversy or argument by exchanging analysis during dialogue in an effort to deliberate and scrutinize a dispute. Nothing about that relates to a debate.
Click to expand...

Debate and discuss are synonyms.
 
zyzygy said:
You take the Humpty Dumpty approach to language, I'll stick with the dictionary.
Click to expand...

I agreed with you in a round about way. Read your definition and then what I wrote again.
 
zyzygy said:
You take the Humpty Dumpty approach to language, I'll stick with the dictionary.
Click to expand...

In this case, you're sticking with a thesaurus, not a dictionary. :mrgreen:
 
Thanks for that but some people aren't keen on debate and would rather hold a discussion, me personally, I don't mind either.
 
So this thread as turned into a semantic argument......:roll:
 
stundie said:
So this thread as turned into a semantic argument......:roll:
Click to expand...

When the facts don't support one's chosen position on a given subject, semantics and slander are all one can employ.
 
Thoreau72 said:
When the facts don't support one's chosen position on a given subject, semantics and slander are all one can employ.
Click to expand...

When are you going to start supporting your position? We have to occupy the time while we wait for your DC thread.
 
zyzygy said:
When are you going to start supporting your position? We have to occupy the time while we wait for your DC thread.
Click to expand...

HD doesn't do facts, they get in the way of the narrative
 
zyzygy said:
When are you going to start supporting your position? We have to occupy the time while we wait for your DC thread.
Click to expand...

Many of HD's post seem to be referring to himself. :lamo

Facts not supporting one's position. check.
using semantics and slander (more like attempts at insults) , check.

See it all fits most of the CT posters.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom