• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

American Dictator

LOL

So I prove your claim was BS, and you advise me to read up on history?

So, here's a question Professor jet57, what about content of these orders?

Between the two, who has issued more restrictive and impactful EO's?

You didn;t prove anything was BS dude. You threw FDR into the mix outta nowhere and I told you what was up with him.

Reads history please.
 
You didn;t prove anything was BS dude. You threw FDR into the mix outta nowhere and I told you what was up with him.

Reads history please.

:roll:

You wrote:

Ronald Reagan singed off more of them than Obama, so wouldn't that mean that Reagan was The King? Absolute monarch - right?​

FDR was actually The King, the Absolute Monarch - right?

Do try to keep your RDS under control as well as your boasts about history. It's clear you view of history is hampered by some issues.
 
:roll:

You wrote:

Ronald Reagan singed off more of them than Obama, so wouldn't that mean that Reagan was The King? Absolute monarch - right?​

FDR was actually The King, the Absolute Monarch - right?

Do try to keep your RDS under control as well as your boasts about history. It's clear you view of history is hampered by some issues.

No FDR was the savior.
 
No FDR was the savior.

Some believe that. To the point, he was indeed The King, and Absolute Monarch when it comes to EO's, contrary to your attempt to ignore this history you made the mistake of claiming you know.
 
Some believe that. To the point, he was indeed The King, and Absolute Monarch when it comes to EO's, contrary to your attempt to ignore this history you made the mistake of claiming you know.

Dude. I said that Reagan wrote more than Obama.

That was right.

You can think whatever you want about FDR, but you'll never change history.

Read up on it, you'll like it.
 
Dude. I said that Reagan wrote more than Obama.

That was right.

You can think whatever you want about FDR, but you'll never change history.

Read up on it, you'll like it.

:lamo

No, you wrote: "Ronald Reagan singed off more of them than Obama, so wouldn't that mean that Reagan was The King? Absolute monarch - right?"

You do history a disservice.

:screwy
 
Not if you were a Japanese American in the west.

Considering how many of your fellow Trumpettes want to put Muslim Americans in camps, the hypocrisy in this statement is hilarious.
 
:lamo

No, you wrote: "Ronald Reagan singed off more of them than Obama, so wouldn't that mean that Reagan was The King? Absolute monarch - right?"

You do history a disservice.

:screwy

You go along way to say nothing.

:2wave:
 
Mind giving more context? You talking about Bush? Obama? Clinton? Bush Sr? What? Who? How?

I'd wager that all of them have used EOs in a manner that went beyond the limits of their post.
 
Ronald Reagan singed off more of them than Obama, so wouldn't that mean that Reagan was The King? Absolute monarch - right?

Number is of EOs is a really simplistic way to look at it. A President could do a million EOs and it be perfectly normal and acceptable. Another President could do only one EO and it be a complete violation of civil liberties and the Constitution.
 
Treasonous? Where is your proof? Watch what you say. Obviously you will vote for Trump who is far more a potential traitor if he is not already there. He has a good business relationship with the enemy. That will make him a security risk not to mention conflict of interests. Will you be comfortable voting for this guy? Have you wondered why Putin is the only person he has not insulted? Are you aware that the Russians have a keen interest in the election? Or do you care?

Let's see...no proof, no proof, no proof, and wild speculation. Oh, and Russia is always interested in U.S. elections. The entire world is always interested in the U.S. elections. They want to see what they can expect to be imposed on them for the next 4 years.
 
We all had tough times in those days.

Remember how you felt on 911.

Yeah...good excuse. If you have a rough day at work do you get to abuse other people for it?

Executive Order 9066
 
Considering how many of your fellow Trumpettes want to put Muslim Americans in camps, the hypocrisy in this statement is hilarious.

Yes, now there's a brilliant analogy. "Trumpettes" (not actually even Trump) speaking about "putting muslim Americans in camps" (zero impact on anyone), and FDR (actual POTUS) rounding up innocent Americans and putting them in camps. Yep, almost the exact same thing! Well, I guess to the warped liberal mind.
 
Yes, now there's a brilliant analogy. "Trumpettes" (not actually even Trump) speaking about "putting muslim Americans in camps" (zero impact on anyone), and FDR (actual POTUS) rounding up innocent Americans and putting them in camps. Yep, almost the exact same thing! Well, I guess to the warped liberal mind.

The Trumpettes are only parroting what they want Trump to do. And, judging from Trump's lack of judgment, if he's elected you can bet it'll come to pass.

So yeah, the analogy still works.
 
We all had tough times in those days.

Remember how you felt on 911.

Yes, very tough for Japanese Americans. I must say, rounding up people and putting them in camps never crossed my mind after 9/11.
 
The Trumpettes are only parroting what they want Trump to do. And, judging from Trump's lack of judgment, if he's elected you can bet it'll come to pass.

So yeah, the analogy still works.

LOL! That's so weak. Parroting? Parroting is just repeating something, not proclaiming what you want. So that makes no sense. If Trump's elected, what will come to pass? The equivalent of what FDR did?
 
LOL! That's so weak. Parroting? Parroting is just repeating something, not proclaiming what you want. So that makes no sense. If Trump's elected, what will come to pass? The equivalent of what FDR did?

I hate to break it to you, but just because you claim something don't make it so. You actually have to back it up

If Truump's elected, you will more likely than not see something like interment camps for Muslims.

After all, that kind of **** plays well with his base.
 
I hate to break it to you, but just because you claim something don't make it so. You actually have to back it up

If Truump's elected, you will more likely than not see something like interment camps for Muslims.

After all, that kind of **** plays well with his base.

FDR DID put Americans in internment camps. Trump has not (Nor has anyone else). Where's the analogy?
 
FDR DID put Americans in internment camps. Trump has not (Nor has anyone else). Where's the analogy?

Trump doesn't have the authority yet. Wouldn't stop him if he did.
 
Number is of EOs is a really simplistic way to look at it. A President could do a million EOs and it be perfectly normal and acceptable. Another President could do only one EO and it be a complete violation of civil liberties and the Constitution.

You've missed that I was countering the right-wing here making a big deal of the number of EOs Obama made. and then Ocean has to bring in FDR like he's got the smoking gun. These EOs are primarily an effect of the issues and congress. I'm surprised that Obama doesn't have 612 of them by now the way congress has treated him and the crash to deal with as well.
 
Yeah...good excuse. If you have a rough day at work do you get to abuse other people for it?

Executive Order 9066

Wrong again: the mood toward anybody from the Middle East on 911 and for some time afterward was very hostile. The point is, now we know how people must have felt about the Japanese after the attack.
 
Back
Top Bottom