- Joined
- May 1, 2014
- Messages
- 2,235
- Reaction score
- 1,030
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
I haven't a clue about Gramscian strategy. Never heard the term before in my whole life.
As for your not necessarily correct perception of my having zero perception of how "the left" works, that might very result from the fact that I don't really give a tinker's dam about "how the left works", whatever you might mean by that.
For a variety of reasons, one of my hobbies has long been "how humans work", and that is not limited to political parties or viewpoints.
I will continue to support Americans United because they are one of a few organizations that defends religious freedom AND the First Amendment requirement that the government remain neutral in religious matters.
BTW, I do not see libertarianism as some sort of religion, complete with dogma. In the most general terms I agree with it mostly because it offers constitutional governance. That is something the duopoly does not offer in practice.
You can't have it both ways Thoreau, i.e. you can't claim to be above being influenced by leftist strategy, yet admit that you know nothing about it.
If you know nothing about it, how would you know if you were under its influence?? If one of the strategic goals of the left is to enlist unwitting dupes into working for their own enslavement - and you admit you understand none of it - how would you even know if you were, in fact, one of the unwitting dupes??
Communists refer to people like you as useful idiots.
Nothing personal, just pointing out to you that there is an entire field of study out there dedicated to manipulating you into working for your own demise. If you dig under the surface of organizations like the one you mentioned you'd find communist roots, communist support, communist monkey wrenches at every turn.
How many people are aware that Rosa Parks was a member of a communist cell, and that refusing to give up her seat on the bus was her "assignment". Never mind that the cause in a microcosm was correct and just - social justice certainly wasn't, and never has been the goal of communists and those who steer them.
You're a babe in the woods on these subjects. Just b/c you have some gray hairs doesn't mean you know all.