• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Neil Armstrong Refuses to Swear on the Bilble that he Walked on the Moon

Dibbler said:
This the moon thread has me wondering why NASA Cosmonaughts seen to behave so strangely. Why won't Neil do the simple act of swearing on the bible about it ?




And look at these guys, instead of being excited about the MOON LANDING, the look and act like they are being interrogated. :confused:

Click to expand...


He was ambushed at a meeting. How ridiculous. And, by his NOT swearing on.the Bible! That means it was a conspiracy? God. Swearing on the Bible to a lie would be just one more lie for him...we're all sinners, after all.

As to nudge nudge wink wink, you're seeing things.
 
Deuce said:
No, really. That "Big Bang Theory" episode wasn't making that up. (although it would be pretty difficult for an amateur to do on their own, you'd need precision to a few arcseconds I think.

Here's a BBC bit on it.
Click to expand...

I saw that one. Cool.

Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk
 
Manc Skipper said:
This is boring. You can have no such evidence, because prior to the landings the resolution was insufficient to make accurate measurements.
Click to expand...

bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla ......................................................................





Please get a hold of this magazine: "National Geographic, December 1966":

NationalGeographic.GIF


And read the article:

"The Laser's Bright Magic
by Thomas Maloy, Howard Sochurek. Page 874-6

Ruby Eye Scans the Heavens

In the Sacramento Mountains near Cloudcroft, New Mexico, a laser keeps a ruby eye peeled for missiles and satellites. Operated by Air Force Systems Command, this instrument fires a searching laser beam hundreds of times finer (or narrow) than radar, picks up the reflected signals with an optical telescope, and measures the distance to the target.

As with microwave radar, the time each pulsed signal takes to go to the target and return reveals the distance automatically.

At 500 miles, radar can determine the distance within an error of about 100 feet; the laser narrows the error to about 25 feet. Moreover, the laser range finder, which requires a much smaller antenna, is more difficult for an enemy to detect or jam.

The laser's enormous advantage lies in its almost perfectly parallel, or collimated, radiation. When passed through a telescope-in-reverse, the beam diverges as little as a third of an inch in a mile of travel, and thus dissipates its power very slowly.

Four years ago (1962), a ruby laser considerably smaller than those now available shot a series of pulses at the moon, 240,000 miles away. The beams illuminated a spot less than two miles in diameter and were reflected back to earth with enough strength to be measured by ultrasensitive electronic equipment. The beam of a high-quality searchlight, if it reached that far, would spread out to several times the moon's 2,160-mile diameter.

Such fantastic directivity, combined with brightness, gives the laser incalculable value for a host of jobs in war and peace. For example, here are some of the most important potential uses:
Click to expand...




well, it seems really they could to it before the, alledged, moonlandings,

Well, of course, because the moon landings were a big hioax and that comes clearer by the day.
 
Last edited:
Always funny to see people who have done no research, are the ones that think they know.

Ah well, such is the state of the world..
 
Pin dÁr said:
Always funny to see people who have done no research, are the ones that think they know.

Ah well, such is the state of the world..
Click to expand...

You are the perfect example
 
zyzygy said:
Why should he swear on an old book of stories just to please an idiot? The Russians have cosmonauts, the USA has astronauts, by the way.
Click to expand...

Shows how well people fact check...
 
 
Last edited:
Lord of Planar said:
I suppose you CT guys think all these nearly 1,000 Apollo 11 photos are faked:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/sets/72157659051355812

https://www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/sets/72157658638144538

https://www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/sets/72157659042075710

https://www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/sets/72157658629097469

https://www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/sets/72157658601662068

https://www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/sets/72157657350941603

https://www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/sets/72157659257018709

https://www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/sets/72157658666156148

From:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/albums

105 sets of photos from Apollo 7 to Apollo 17
Click to expand...

Of course they are all faked. If (all) the manned Moon landing(s) were faked then it follows that all evidence of man on the Moon is also fake. No reason to even consider the photo's really. We already know.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom