- Joined
- Jan 26, 2010
- Messages
- 38,945
- Reaction score
- 22,237
- Location
- arizona
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Re: 9/11 Truth Group after 9 years finally appears to do something useful.
Then why do you post on a debate forum if you care not to discuss your opinions?
14+ years and many who say the govt. is wrong will not post anything but opinions.
As the saying goes, you can't fix stupid. Ignorance can be corrected through education if one wants to learn. Some do not apparently want to learn. eace
Back to the OP. If the study shows that NIST got it wrong, how does that prove CD which AE911T seems to support? Will it eliminate all possible fire induced collapse scenarios?
Can't wait to see them run an analysis showing it was nano neutron bombs as Prager states. Wonder if the study will explain the nano thermite which Gage, et.al seems to have given up on.
If you don't know it by now Mike, you'll never know it. There is nothing I could say or do to explain that to you. As Mark Twain noted, it is easier to fool a man than it is to explain to him how he has been fooled. eace
Then why do you post on a debate forum if you care not to discuss your opinions?
14+ years and many who say the govt. is wrong will not post anything but opinions.
As the saying goes, you can't fix stupid. Ignorance can be corrected through education if one wants to learn. Some do not apparently want to learn. eace
Back to the OP. If the study shows that NIST got it wrong, how does that prove CD which AE911T seems to support? Will it eliminate all possible fire induced collapse scenarios?
Can't wait to see them run an analysis showing it was nano neutron bombs as Prager states. Wonder if the study will explain the nano thermite which Gage, et.al seems to have given up on.
Last edited: