• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

9/11 Trillions: Follow The Money

Buck naked said:
Excuse me, as it's now over $20000 for every man woman and child in the US.

How long will you guys continue to accept and promote the "bad accounting practices" excuse?
Click to expand...

excuse me. Can you tell me how many years it took to accumulate the "trillions" that was redirected to carry out 9/11 as some have claimed?

Was it done in one fiscal year, two, 30?
 
mike2810 said:
excuse me. Can you tell me how many years it took to accumulate the "trillions" that was redirected to carry out 9/11 as some have claimed?

Was it done in one fiscal year, two, 30?
Click to expand...

Who claimed that? One person, two, fifty? Source, please? Or are you just obfuscating the matter of government accountability by promoting or fabricating some obscure claims in order to remove attention to where it belongs?
 
Buck naked said:
Who claimed that? One person, two, fifty? Source, please? Or are you just obfuscating the matter of government accountability by promoting or fabricating some obscure claims in order to remove attention to where it belongs?
Click to expand...

why do you answer questions with questions?

Look at the OP and some of the other posts. Seems Bob and T72 speculate the money was for 9/11. Ask them for more details.

Again, did all the missing trillions come from one year or many years from the Pentagon budget?
 
mike2810 said:
why do you answer questions with questions?
Click to expand...

First of all, as documented, you answered my question with a question first.
Post 25,
Buck naked said:
Excuse me, as it's now over $20000 for every man woman and child in the US.


How long will you guys continue to accept and promote the "bad accounting practices" excuse?
Click to expand...

Post 26,
mike2810 said:
excuse me. Can you tell me how many years it took to accumulate the "trillions" that was redirected to carry out 9/11 as some have claimed?

Was it done in one fiscal year, two, 30?
Click to expand...

Jeez Mike, do I always have to point out your double standards?


Secondly, your questions are often ridiculously loaded and nearly always need further clarification in order to be answered.







mike2810 said:
Look at the OP and some of the other posts. Seems Bob and T72 speculate the money was for 9/11. Ask them for more details.
Click to expand...

First, you’re well aware that Bob’s banned? So how can I ask Bob?
Second, “there’s a hugh difference between “speculate” and knowledge. And if T72 or Bob made a claim, cite it, as for all I know, you’re making it up. The OP made no such claim.
Third, who cares if one or two people make unfounded claims, what does that have to do with me and what does that have to do with proper accountability?



mike2810 said:
Again, did all the missing trillions come from one year or many years from the Pentagon budget?
Click to expand...

Again? Do you even comprehend what you post? That is a different question from your earlier question, Mike. First you asked, "Can you tell me how many years it took to accumulate the "trillions" that was redirected to carry out 9/11”, then you asked, "Again, did all the missing trillions come from one year or many years from the Pentagon budget?”. Do you see the difference?


So which question am I suppose to answer? Your ridiculous first question based upon a false premise that is impossible for me to answer or the second question which was already answered within the report if you bothered to read it.


But, hey, you're doing a good job of taking the spotlight off of the 20+ years of atrocious Pentagon accountability. I wish I had such leeway with my finances.
 
Buck naked.

Yes, the Pentagon has had and maybe even today have terrible booking.

Do you believe the missing money has any ties to funding 9/11? Yes or No.

See my sig regarding my posts.
 
mike2810 said:
Yes, the Pentagon has had and maybe even today have terrible booking.
Click to expand...

That is just an excuse which doesn’t answer where the 6.5 Trillion was spent. Why do you excuse the Pentagon when the US Gov would put you in prison for the same action?

mike2810 said:
Do you believe the missing money has any ties to funding 9/11? Yes or No..
Click to expand...

No. I have no clue where the money was spent. Do you know where it was spent?

mike2810 said:
See my sig regarding my posts.
Click to expand...

And sorry Mike, as your poor reading comprehension, communication and reasoning skills have demonstrated throughout this forum, your sig is based on nothing more than a false premise.

 
Buck naked said:
That is just an excuse which doesn’t answer where the 6.5 Trillion was spent. Why do you excuse the Pentagon when the US Gov would put you in prison for the same action?



No. I have no clue where the money was spent. Do you know where it was spent?



And sorry Mike, as your poor reading comprehension, communication and reasoning skills have demonstrated throughout this forum, your sig is based on nothing more than a false premise.
Click to expand...

Then we really have no issue to discuss since neither of us believe the "money" was used to fund the 9/11 event.
Do I know exactly were the missing money is or was spent on. Nope. Too many years. My guess if project overruns and bad accounting methods.

You do realize the OP was linking the money to 9/11. That is the topic of the OP. Follow the money. You seem to want to derail into a general discussion of bad fiscal management at the Pentagon.



Sorry BN. your debating style is typical of many CT posters. Funny how so many other posters can understand what I post. I can't help you. It is your problem.:mrgreen:

Have a good one. :peace
 
Last edited:
Thoreau72 said:
You must be dreaming Jeffrey. There is no waste in the Pentagon, and no fraud and no abuse. They are straight shooters, because they said so. ;)
Click to expand...

What's the matter with you????? I noted that there IS lots of waste, fraud and abuse related to procurement and budgets at the DOD...
 
mike2810 said:
You do realize the OP was linking the money to 9/11. That is the topic of the OP. Follow the money. You seem to want to derail into a general discussion of bad fiscal management at the Pentagon.

Sorry BN. your debating style is typical of many CT posters. Funny how so many other posters can understand what I post. I can't help you. It is your problem.:mrgreen:

Have a good one. :peace
Click to expand...

Incorrect and again demonstrates the problem with your comprehension skills.

The OP and video are not claiming or linking the missing Pentagon money to 911. The OP is criticising the 911 Commission’s conclusion that the money used to finance the 911 crime is “of little practical significance” and not worthy of proper investigation. The OP and video are arguing that in order to carry out a proper investigation, it is common practice for investigators to “Follow the Money”.

I think you got derailed by Mark’s posts obfuscating the OP and video with some made up/ fringe conspiracy theory about the unaccounted for Pentagon money.

Now go back and rewatch the video, perhaps the second time around you’ll get it.:peace


 
Buck naked said:
Incorrect and again demonstrates the problem with your comprehension skills.

The OP and video are not claiming or linking the missing Pentagon money to 911. The OP is criticising the 911 Commission’s conclusion that the money used to finance the 911 crime is “of little practical significance” and not worthy of proper investigation. The OP and video are arguing that in order to carry out a proper investigation, it is common practice for investigators to “Follow the Money”.

I think you got derailed by Mark’s posts obfuscating the OP and video with some made up/ fringe conspiracy theory about the unaccounted for Pentagon money.

Now go back and rewatch the video, perhaps the second time around you’ll get it.:peace
Click to expand...

Ah so you watched the vid. Good to know

"No Conclusion

Insurance scams and insider trading, electronic fraud and vulgar betrayal, missing money and evidence destroyed. There are at least 8.5 trillion reasons to investigate the money trail of 9/11.

Curious, then, that the US government’s final word on the attacks, the 9/11 Commission Report, concluded that the money trail was not worthy of investigation at all. In Chapter Five of the report, the commission noted: “To date, the U.S. government has not been able to determine the origin of the money used for the 9/11 attacks. Ultimately the question is of little practical significance.”

9/11 was a crime. And as every detective knows, the first rule of criminal investigation is to follow the money. So why did the 9/11 Commission specifically reject this rule?

The answers to 9/11 are not going to come from the suspects of the crime. Instead, it’s up to investigators to continue to unearth the true evidence on the 9/11 money trail.

Follow the money…
https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-308-911-trillions-follow-the-money/
"

Noted .. The vid has no conclusion. just a bunch of questions and if statements.

Nah, watched it a long time ago. Nothing there, so move on.
 
Last edited:
SanderO said:
What's the matter with you????? I noted that there IS lots of waste, fraud and abuse related to procurement and budgets at the DOD...
Click to expand...

Clearly Jeffrey, I was kidding. Notice the winking emoticon. ;)

Yes, the pentagon is notorious for its waste. Some people are concerned, others don't even think about it. In general terms, Ike cautioned about it in 1961.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom